100% (1)
page:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
8
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Other (Not Listed)
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 21.6
Topic:

Literature review paper

Other (Not Listed) Instructions:
Literature review paper One of the main learning exercises in the course is a Literature review paper. The literature review paper's purpose is to answer a significant clinical question. Your paper should be 5-6 pages long (double-spaced, 12 font) not including the references and title page). You should have a reference page of at least eight (8) academic sources, including at least five (5) primary research sources that specifically answer the review question. Use APA format for references and citations. All papers must be submitted to be reviewed for similarity, any paper with a score of 20% or higher in the similarity index, will receive an automatic “0”, and will not be reviewed until the similarity score is below 20%. Instructions: Your paper needs to follow the following criteria: Choose a problem clients face in your practice area that you think is important and would like to learn more about Use your knowledge of PICO to develop a well-built narrow clinical question. For example: In adult patients with total hip replacements (P), how effective is pain medication (I) compared to aerobic stretching (C) in controlling post-operative pain (O)? (the development of the PICO question should not be included in the paper) (Use discussion 2 & 3). Write a five (5) to six (6) page literature review paper on the standing knowledge of the chosen question. Include a minimum of five (5) journal articles, at least three (3) from nursing journals. However, make sure that the (5) journals are the ones analyzed and synthesized in the results and discussion sections. The body of the paper should be made of the following titled sections: Title (introduction), Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. Provide a specific and concise tentative title for your literature review paper (You may use the results or at least the variables in the title). The abstract is not required Include a 1-page introduction of your topic (background information), the focus/aim of your review. The introduction should include a statement of the problem, briefly explain the significance of your topic study, and act to introduce the reader to your definitions and background. Must include your main statement (i.e. the purpose of this review is...{PICO Question}). The method section should include sources, databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion criteria, levels of evidence, and other information that establishes credibility to your paper (Use discussion 4 & 5). The results should summarize the findings of studies that have been conducted on your topic. For each study, you should briefly explain its purpose, procedure for data collection, and major findings. This is the section where you will discuss the strengths and weaknesses of studies (Use discussion 6 and activity 2). Submit a table of the studies as per the matrix development (see discussion 7). The discussion should be like a conclusion portion of an essay paper. It serves as a summary of the body of your literature review and should highlight the most important findings. Your analysis should help you to draw conclusions. In this section, you would discuss any consensus or disagreement on the topic. It can also include any strengths and weaknesses in general of the research area. If you believe there is more to research, you may include that here. Finally, you will need to conclude your paper. At this point, you have put substantial effort into your paper. Close this chapter with a summary of the paper, major findings, and any major recommendations for the profession. In general, your paper should show a sense of direction and contain a definite central idea supported with evidence. The writing should be logical, and the ideas should be linked together in a logical sequence. The ideas need to be put together clearly for the writer and for the reader.
Other (Not Listed) Sample Content Preview:
The Risk of Blood Clots in Women Using Oral Contraceptives Compared to IUDs Name of Student Course Name of Professor University Date The Risk of Blood Clots in Women Using Oral Contraceptives Compared to IUDs Taking contraceptives is common among women of reproductive age, and contraceptives are of various types, which include oral contraceptives (OCs) and IUDs. Contraceptives are used to prevent pregnancy, but they also help to address many gynecologic concerns (Ibrahim et al.,2021). However, the safety of these contraceptives, especially the risk of VTE- venous thromboembolism, has been of significant concern (Galanaud et al.,2020). VTE includes DVT- deep vein thrombosis and PE- pulmonary embolism and is potentially fatal, which results in substantial morbidity and mortality if left undiagnosed and unmanaged. The significance of this study is derived from its clinical relevance in practical patient care and counseling. Since millions of females worldwide rely on contraceptives, offering a better understanding of the risks associated with various contraception types may help to advance patient care and potentially reduce VTE risk (Kantorová et al., 2020). From the literature review, it was established that the relative risk of VTE in women using COCs ranges from three to sixfold in comparison to women with no use of these contraceptives. However, the same cannot be said for IUDs, especially non-hormone-releasing coils, where the risk of VTE is not significantly elevated, with an incidence rate ranging between 6-12 per 10,000 women years. However, IUDs, especially the non-hormonal ones, are not associated with an increased risk of VTE as the incidence rate resembles that of non-users, at around 1-2 per 10,000 women years (Khialani et al.,2020). This literature review aims to address the clinical question: Is the use of oral contraceptives a risk factor exposing women to blood clots compared to the use of an IUD within five years? Methods The method used in this literature review involved consulting various academic databases such as CINAHL, PubMed, and Health Source Consumer databases. It was aimed at identifying several articles retrieved from peer-reviewed scholarly journals that provided a credible comparative probability of VTE in women taking OCs rather than using IUDs. The following terms and phrases were included to make the search more comprehensive: birth control pills, intrauterine devices, thromboembolism, thrombosis, and risk factors. The sample selection criteria were defined very well, which offered much relevancy and grounds to the selected literature. Peer-reviewed journals published within the last ten years focused on a direct comparison of VTE risks between women who use OCs and those using IUDs. This practice is essential to capture the most current and practice-relevant outcomes and forms of medical interventions and contraceptives (Verlaan et al.,2024). Any article that fails to address these criteria was deemed ineligible for inclusion. More detailed exclusion criteria included the studies that were not published in English, the ones that involved only males, or those that dealt with issues other than reproductive health, and the articles that were not peer-reviewed. The quality of evidence of the chosen articles was critically evaluated to determine the conclusions’ reliability. As part of this assessment, the study design was compared, with the preference for randomized controlled trials and extensive study samples since such designs provide the most substantial evidence. Furthermore, sample size was considered, whereby, in most cases, a large sample size yields more accurate result. The methods used in the studies were also critically evaluated to determine the validity of the results, including proper statistical analysis and possible confounding factors, fulfilling Verlaan et al.’s (2024) recommendations. In this way, this literature review compared the risk of VTE between women taking OCPs and those with IUDs and contribute to the understanding of better and safer ways of taking contraceptives in the future. Results From the literature review, five central studies were established that were concerned with the risk of VTE among women taking OCs as compared to those using IUDs. Every study helped shed light on the varying risks associated with these contraceptives. Barros et al. (2024) have provided a comprehensive systematic review focusing on VTE risk with different types of hormonal contraceptives. This investigation aimed to assess the thrombogenic potentials of various con...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Sign In
Not register? Register Now!