Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
3
Style:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 10.8
Topic:
Trials and Verdicts
Essay Instructions:
Use the Internet to research three real-life cases from the past five (5) years that fit the following criteria:
Cases that depict the unique processes related to different courts
The defendant accepted a plea bargain as an alternative to trial
The defendant was wrongly accused and later vindicated
Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:
Discuss one (1) real-life criminal case, taken from current events, and identify the court that took jurisdiction. Explain why the court that took the case was the appropriate one for the particular circumstances.
Discuss the real-life case that you have selected, in which the defendant accepted a plea bargain as an alternative to trial. Give your opinion on whether or not justice was served in the case in question. Provide a rationale for the response.
Discuss the real-life case that you selected, in which, like Roland Gary, the defendant was wrongly accused and later vindicated. Explore one (1) key aspect of the case and examine its relation to the case at large. Describe the resolution to the selected case.
Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student's name, the professor's name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
Essay Sample Content Preview:
TRIALS AND VERDICTS
Name:
Grade Course:
Tutor`s Name:
Date of Submission
Trials and Verdicts
The supreme court of Philippines blocked a move by the defendant to try and pay bail as well as to enter a plea bargain in which he could then buy his freedom and go free without getting a full sentence for his crimes. The defendant in this case was a senior general who had been charged with several graft cases and he is former military comptroller Major General Carlos Garcia. The Supreme Court was the best jurisdiction to take over this case because it has the highest authority to handle cases ion the entire nation of Philippines. As such, it has the ability to preside over cases involving highly influential people and large amounts of money, in which courts with lower authority could be easily corrupt. Moreover, judges in lower courts may be intimidated, or their authority undermined. In this case, the defendant faced charges against the government and as such, the government wanted stricter punishment for theMajor General Carlos Garcia so that he could serve as an example to the rest of the nation for involving in such atrocious crime.
According to the Court, the Major General was accused with squandering money from the government during his term in office as the top finance official. During this time, the accused is said to have stolen an a sum of money not less than three hundred million pesos, which is equivalent to $6.99 million, and which was used to purchase property both in the Philippines and the US for both his family and himself. This case was only made known in the year 2003 and has continued to trouble the courts since then. However, the Supreme Court intervened after the anti-graft court ruled that the accused be given a plea bargain in which he would be let to go if he paid 135 million pesos. The Supreme Court refused to accept a plea bargain and the accused may now be charged with more serious charges including plunder, all of which will total to a forty-year sentence.
In the murder case against the former Ms Washington, Peggy Sue Thomas, 47, the court issued a plea bargain in which the accused was issued with a less sentence after accepting to plead guilty for a less serious crime. Peggy Sue Thomas was accused of assisting her former boyfriend, James Haden to murder a victim called Douglas in cold blood. According to the courts, this could mean up to...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now: