100% (1)
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
5
Style:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 10.8
Topic:

Same topic

Essay Instructions:
I attached previous assignment to help with this part argumentative paper. Be sure your essay contains the following: An opening paragraph that states a clear thesis that is focused, plausible, and arguable and that gives direction and purpose to the paper A fair-minded, balanced, and objective development of the pros and cons of the issue in a well-organized sequence of ideas, free of mechanical errors Credible, reliable, and authoritative evidence in support of the points made A strong conclusion that summarizes your views, reminds the audience of the issue and its importance, and shows in brief that you have successfully defended your thesis
Essay Sample Content Preview:
Mandatory Vaccination Student’s Name Institution Course Number and Name Instructor’s Name Date Mandatory Vaccination One of the key contentious issues in the US and the world at large revolves around mandatory vaccinations. On one side are proponents of mandatory vaccination who argue that it is justified given the government's interest in protecting the needs of the many in a country. On the other hand, opponents argue against mandatory vaccination by emphasizing that it violates personal freedom to choose. Both sides of the debate make convincing arguments to justify their positions. The emergence of COVID-19 and governments’ plans for mass vaccinations rejuvenated the debate on whether or not vaccines should be compulsory. Vaccination should be mandatory in the United States because it is consistent with the Constitution and libertarianism and promotes the common good. The support of mandatory vaccination by the Constitution and court rulings justifies its implementation. According to Chemerinsky & Goodwin (2016), while there have been many challenges against compulsory vaccination, they have all been consistently rejected by courts. As the interpreter of the Constitution, courts have a key role in determining whether an action is legal or not. At the Supreme Court, challenges against compulsory laws by states have been rejected. In Jacobson v. Massachusetts and Zucht v. King, the Supreme Court upheld compulsory vaccination mandates (Chemerinsky & Goodwin, 2016). The religious freedom argument is often used to argue against compulsory vaccination but as informed by Chemerinsky & Goodwin (2016), it is invalid as courts have made a determination that one cannot use the Free Exercise Clause to "challenge a neutral law of general applicability" (p.609). Furthermore, Chemerinsky and Goodwin (2016) point out that mandatory vaccination laws are consistent with the strict scrutiny principle, implying that the government's interest in protecting all people is compelling. Therefore, constitutionally, mandatory vaccination laws should be allowed in the US. Mandatory vaccination is supported by one of the popular political philosophies, libertarianism. As informed by Brennan (2016), libertarianism contents that all people are self-owners, implying that individuals have almost an absolute right against interference. According to Brennan (2016), vaccine refusal violates the clean-hands principle that is supported by liber...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Sign In
Not register? Register Now!