100% (1)
Pages:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
4
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 24.3
Topic:

Assignment 6.1: Governance for Quality and Safety

Essay Instructions:
Directions In a four- to five-page paper (not counting cover and reference pages) in APA format, address the following: Review and describe the current macro (national) and micro (organization’s board of directors [BOD]) roles for governance of quality and safety. How might these governing bodies effect a change in population health, safety, and quality, inclusive of health equity and socioeconomic determinants of health? In addition to your textbook, support your claims with two or three scholarly primary research articles related to health disparity or equity as they relate to quality and safety, and integrate key findings in your paper. What to Submit Your paper in Microsoft Word If you copy and paste references from the course into your assignment, be sure to confirm APA formatting before submitting. Similarity Score After submitting your assignment, select Submission Details to view your similarity score. Your similarity score will appear as a percentage next to your submitted file. It may take up to 24 hours for your similarity score to appear. Governance for Quality and Safety Rubric Governance for Quality and Safety Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts National and BOD Roles 10 pts Excellently written description, showing deep understanding of the two roles. 9.25 pts Well-written description, showing a strong understanding of the two roles. 8.5 pts Somewhat well-written description, showing a basic understanding of the two roles. 8 pts Poorly written description, showing little understanding of the two roles. 0 pts Missing or very poorly written description, showing no effort in understanding the two roles. / 10 pts How They Can Effect Change 20 pts Excellently written explanation, showing deep understanding of how they can effect change. 18.25 pts Well-written explanation, showing a strong understanding of how they can effect change. 17 pts Somewhat well-written explanation, showing a basic understanding of how they can effect change. 16 pts Poorly written explanation, showing little understanding of how they can effect change. 0 pts Missing or very poorly written explanation, showing no effort in understanding how they can effect change. / 20 pts Integrates Primary Research on Health Disparity or Equity 10 pts Excellently integrates research to support claims. 9.25 pts Integrates research to support claims. 8.5 pts Poorly integrates research to support claims. 8 pts Somewhat integrates research to support claims. 0 pts Does not or very poorly integrates research to support claims. / 10 pts Spelling, Grammar, and Writing 5 pts Excellently written and composed. No errors in spelling and grammar. 4.75 pts Well-written and composed. A few minor errors in spelling and/or grammar. 4.25 pts Somewhat well-written and composed. Many minor errors in spelling and/or grammar. 4 pts Poorly written and composed. Major errors in spelling and/or grammar, but still understandable. 0 pts Very poorly written and composed. Major errors in spelling and/or grammar make it difficult to understand. / 5 pts APA Format 5 pts No errors in format. 4.75 pts A few minor errors in format. 4.25 pts Many minor errors in format. 4 pts Major errors in format. 0 pts APA format not used. / 5 pts Total Points: 0
Essay Sample Content Preview:
Assignment 6.1: Governance for Quality and Safety Student’s Name Institution Course Code: Course Name Professor’s Name Submission Date Assignment 6.1: Governance for Quality and Safety Healthcare is a necessity in human life, and elected leaders strive to ensure that these services are affordable. However, healthcare disparities exist between populations and regions. Moreover, there are challenges in guaranteeing quality and safety when providing healthcare services. Governing bodies at the national level are tasked with overseeing the healthcare system to ensure diversity, equity, and quality. Internally, there are quality and safety committees that oversee the daily operations of a healthcare facility. This paper discusses macro and micro roles for the governance of safety and quality and the impact of governing bodies on population health, quality and safety, social determinants of health, and health equity. Micro Roles for Governance of Quality and Safety Healthcare is a sensitive area at the national and international levels, and it requires the provision of evidence-based and personalized care. National and regional entities spearhead quality and safety in healthcare facilities. National governments and health departments are pivotal in developing regulations that define quality and safety benchmarks. In the United States, many national and state organizations oversee healthcare operations and prioritize quality service provision. Agencies such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) set standards for care delivery, implement quality improvement initiatives, and enforce compliance (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid, 2024). At the same time, there are organizations tasked with accreditation and certification. This type of recognition will require constant adherence to healthcare quality metrics. The Joint Commission or the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) assesses healthcare institutions against established standards (Young & Smith, 2022). Accreditation serves as both a motivator and a measure of compliance for healthcare organizations. Macro-level governance significantly influences quality and safety through funding and reimbursement models. Healthcare facilities are gauged against specific healthcare quality metrics. There are value-based care systems whose payment incentives are tied to patient outcomes and adherence to safety protocols. Healthcare facilities that perform well in quality and get good quality audit feedback will be reimbursed well (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid, 2024). For example, the CMS has instituted payment readjustment programs that encourage hospitals to reduce readmission rates and nosocomial infections. Moreover, Organizations like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) collect and disseminate data on hospital performance, enabling stakeholders to make informed decisions while motivating providers to improve outcomes. These programs allow for national benchmarking while encouraging a culture of accountability and competition. Micro Roles for Governance of Quality and Safety National governance on healthcare quality needs to be complemented by individual efforts from healthcare facilities. At the organizational level, governance of quality and safety is primarily overseen by the board of directors (BOD). Hospital management is tasked with implementing quality standards authorized by reputable national agencies. BOD plays different roles in ensuring health quality and safety. First, it develops board-level policies regarding quality and oversees strategic quality goals. This includes setting clear, measurable goals that align with broader national frameworks while addressing the unique needs of their patient populations (Nash et al., 2019). All the operations in the healthcare facility must prioritize quality and safety. The overall strategic goals of the hospital must demonstrate commitment to quality objectives (Drew & Pandit, 2020). Second, the BOD is tasked with regularly reviewing key performance indicators related to quality and safety, which enables the hospital to identify trends in noncompliance, address gaps, and benchmark performance against nat...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Sign In
Not register? Register Now!