Wilson's Idea of a “World Safe for Democracy” and the Espionage Act
Woodrow Wilson argued that the US was entering the war “to make the world safe for democracy”. What does he mean? Why does Senator LaFollete oppose going to war? Does the Espionage Act contradict Wilson's idea of a “world safe for democracy”? Why or why not? How does George Creel persuade the American public to support the war effort? Why did African-Americans fight in the war? How do their reasons for fighting compare to the treatment they have received in the United States? Use examples from Major Problems in American History and White Rage. Your essay must be coherently organized with a topic sentence that contains a thesis, a body containing the evidence that supports your thesis, and a conclusion that reiterates your thesis. NO OUTSIDE SOURCES ARE ALLOWED.
Student
Instructor
Course
Date
American History
Woodrow Wilson declared that the United States (US) was entering World War I “to make the world safe for democracy,” reflecting the perspective of spreading democracy globally. On the other hand, Senator LaFollette opposed the move with concerns about preserving civil liberties. While the Espionage Act contradicts Wilson's idea, it aimed to safeguard national security. George Creel's persuasion rallied public support for the war effort. African Americans engaged in the war for numerous reasons, conflicting with the unequal treatment they endured.
Wilson’s vision for US involvement centered on creating a safe and democratic global society. Joining the war would promote democracy and establish a democratic world order. Therefore, Wilson’s ideals aimed to spread liberty and self-determination. This was hinged on the idea that democracy could bring stability and peace. However, not everyone supported Wilson’s perspective. Senator LaFollette opposed the move