Week 2 EI & Leadership Article Summary

For this assignment, read the article, Emotional Intelligence, by Salovey and Mayer (1990). link:https://wilmu(dot)instructure(dot)com/courses/67018/files/10767906/preview Complete the following: Thoroughly summarize the article Emotional Intelligence (Salovey & Mayer, 1990). Be sure to share the strengths and weaknesses an individual might experience when analyzing personal Emotional Intelligence and Leadership skills. You response should be 1-1.5 pages in length (Excluding cover and reference page). Keep in mind your article summary will need to conform to APA formatting standards. (Cover page, body of paper, reference page). Resources for Assessment: Emotional Intelligence, by Salovey and Mayer (1990). This activity is matched to the following Learning Outcomes: Analyze and evaluate the need for emotionally intelligent leadership Write clearly, concisely, and appropriately using standard American English grammar, punctuation, usage, mechanics, sentence structure, and vocabulary Use appropriate APA format for scholarly writings. Rubric WEEK 2: Article Summary Rubric:100 points WEEK 2: Article Summary Rubric:100 points Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThorough summary of the article Emotional Intelligence, written by Salovey and Mayer. The student’s thesis statement is captured, and the central theme of the article is explained. 20 pts Exceeds Expectations A thorough summary of the article was provided. Thesis statement provided and central theme explained in captivatingly worded language. 15 pts Meets Expectations A satisfactory summary of the article was provided While the thesis statement was present, improvement was needed. The central theme of the article is discussed but is not clear. 10 pts Unsatisfactory The summary was insufficient and failed to meet the requirements of the assignment. Fails to capture, offers the wrong idea or missed the main thesis, or does not explain. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAll of the article’s supporting ideas are summarized and relationships among these ideas are explained without going into detail. 20 pts Exceeds Expectations Supporting ideas are summarized and relationships explained while at the same time maintaining an interesting tone and making the summary an interesting read 15 pts Meets Expectations Some of the supporting ideas are summarized and relationships explained 10 pts Unsatisfactory Main ideas are not summarized, and relationships to ideas are not explained. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting style • Ideas are clearly connected and make sense. • Important points are supported with facts, examples, or referenced back to the article with the appropriate citation. 20 pts Exceeds Expectations Ideas are connected, important points make sense, citations are used, and facts and examples support the main ideas. Logical flow of ideas, transitions are used, 15 pts Meets Expectations Ideas are connected, important points make sense, citations are used, and facts and examples support the main ideas 10 pts Unsatisfactory Ideas are not connected, little or no supporting facts or use of material from the article, parts are confusing, and/or includes generalizations. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMUGS Mechanics, spelling, grammar and punctuation, transitions to connect sentences and ideas. Correct choice of words used, verb tenses, avoidance of wordy phrases, etc. 20 pts Exceeds Expectations No errors whatsoever! This summary is easy to read and makes sense the first time it is read. It is interesting to read and smoothly written. No wrong word choice or slang, uses correct verb tenses. Tightly written and uses words to convey meaning rather than take up space. 15 pts Meets Expectations Between 4-5 errors, but they are minor and do not detract from the summary. Summary expresses the ideas of the author; sentences relate to one another; may take a re-reading to understand. Occasional wrong word choice, somewhat wordy but not enough to detract from the summary. May occasionally use wrong verb tense. 10 pts Unsatisfactory Exceeds 8 grammatical and/or punctuation errors. Choppy, sentences are not connected. Improper use of language or slang, wrong word choice, appears “padded” 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization Clearly organized introduction, body, conclusion APA-style title page, citations, and references; Appropriately uses in- text citations in APA style formatting. 20 pts Exceeds Expectations Smoothly written, easy to read, topic introduced, organization clearly evident. Exceeds these criteria by completely meeting ALL of these requirements with NO exceptions! 15 pts Meets Expectations Summary has Intro, body, conclusion Meets this criteria with only minor (3-4) exceptions. 10 pts Unsatisfactory Disorganized, leaves the reader wondering what is being said. Fails to meet this criteria by obvious disregard (+8) for the expectations stated in the criteria. 20 pts Total Points: 100