Positivism
1. Positivism, Constructivism, Postmodernism
2. Choose one of the studies, write a brief summary, and respond to the theories and philosophies in the research performance and interpretation.
3. The summary should be no more than one paragraph. In no more than 500 words, discuss the particular "ism" that serves as the foundational premise for the research and the research paradigm in which it was performed.
4. Critically evaluate the relationship between those choices and the information gathered.
5. In writing this portion of the assignment, you should write in a strong voice and need not spend time placating alternative beliefs.
6. The understanding is that while you respect individual rights to alternative beliefs, this is a manifesto of your own ideas.
7. In responding to your selected theories and philosophies, provide only the briefest initial summary of the nature of that theory of philosophy (a sentence or two at most) and devote the bulk of your writing to the explanation and evaluation of its effects on your research formulation and performance.
Positivism
Student name
Institution
Instructor
Course
Date
Positivism
Positivism is a late 18th and early 19th-century philosophical and scientific paradigm. It holds that only observable facts are valid and should be studied using scientific techniques. Positivism holds that empirical observation and experimentation reveal natural laws. Positivists think science can explain things objectively and value-free.
Summary
Positivism has shaped social science study. Positivists believe social phenomena may be researched like natural phenomena and that social study should seek objective laws of human behaviour. Quantitative research tools like surveys and experiments provide accurate and methodical data collection and analysis, which positivism values. This method lets researchers test hypotheses, establish cause-and-effect links, and apply findings to broader populations. Quantitative research methods yield numerical data that may be statistically examined. Positivism values research that can be replicated by other researchers using the same methodology and procedures. This action ensures that study findings are reliable and can advance science. Replicability enables alternate hypothesis testing and theory refinement. Positivism posits value-free research, which is unlikely since researchers bring their values and prejudices to their work. Positivism also overlooks how subjective experiences and perceptions shape human behaviour, limiting knowledge of complicated social events. Positivism is often criticized for its reductionist approach, simplifying complex social phenomena into isolated ones.
Criticisms
Positivism is criticized for reducing complex social processes to fundamental factors that can be measured and analyzed separately. This approach may need to pay more attention to the context and complexity of social phenomena and the significance of subjective experiences and interpretations in human action. Positivism presupposes value-free research, which may need to be more real...