Oppression and Resilience Among American Indians: Proposal for Problem Resolution
Context, Theory, Model Research Paper (This assignment addresses EPAS Competency 2)
Each student is responsible for writing a three-part individual research paper. Each part is due on a different date (see schedule). The paper must follow APA 7 ed. format and utilize a minimum of eight (8) recent (mid-2000s to present), peer-reviewed, scholarly articles. The maximum total length for all 3 papers combined is 30 pages, so estimate that each paper should be no longer than 10 pages (typed, double-spaced, 1” margins on all sides, paginated). Note: For Part Two, you have the option to find at least one other classmate interested in researching and presenting on the same theory. You may also choose to do a solo presentation if no one else selects the same theory.
Part Three (Model) of this paper is the Assessed Competency for EPAS 2 (Engage diversity and difference in practice) and will be graded using a rubric, which will be provided to students at the start of the course
The following structure must be followed in developing the paper:
PART three
The final section of the paper should be devoted to discussing a proposal of how to work with the target population toward problem resolution. Students should offer strategic approaches for using client strengths and available resources to ameliorate oppressive conditions while empowering clients or client groups. This approach can use micro, mezzo, or macro strategies for intervention. Students are encouraged to be creative and to think “outside the box” in proposing interventions to the oppressive condition that they have discussed. You are required to use the Structure for Culturally Competent Practice Models (below) to structure this section of the paper. This assignment measures your competency in EPAS 2 on diversity and difference and will be graded using a rubric.
A. Based on the solutions suggested by the theory, offer at least two (2) approaches for addressing the problem. What interventions will you use or develop?
B. Discuss how you will promote client empowerment Describe what cultural/group strengths and available resources you will help the client use to address the problem.
C. Discuss potential micro, mezzo, or macro strategies for intervention.
D. Consider how you might evaluate the effectiveness of your interventions or approaches.
Structure for Culturally Competent Practice Models
1. Problem Statement (Brief)
What is the problem? Who is experiencing the problem? What has been done in the past the correct the problem?
2. Assumptions and Underlying Philosophy
What do we take as given in reference to the issue we are seeking to address? Include your observations from life or practice experience, which is not theoretically derived. Also, include what you believe the client’s assumptions are.
3. Theory
Explain the theory or model you are using to explain the nature of the problem and/or the process of addressing the problem. Include the key concepts described in the theory, the relationship of these th concepts, and the ways in which these concepts can be used in used in understanding the issue affecting the client. Include a conceptual diagram.
4.Goals and Objectives
Provide a brief broad statement describing what you wish to achieve in addressing the issue. Then discuss the smaller action steps that will successively lead to accomplishing this goal.
5. Intervention Strategies
Describe the intervention strategies suggested by the theory. What actions will be taken to work in concert with the client/client system to remediate or eliminate the problem?
6. Cultural Dynamics
Identify the specific ways that historical and cultural factors will be integrated into the practice strategy.
7.Anticipated Outcomes
How will you and the client be able to observe that the intervention has been successful?
Oppression and Resilience among American Indians: Proposal for Problem Resolution
Student name
Institution
Professor Name
Course
Date
Oppression and Resilience among American Indians: Proposal for Problem Resolution
The essay examines American Indian persecution and resiliency, both historically and currently. Despite structural marginalization, cultural erasure, and social disadvantages, American Indians are resilient. The essay proposes culturally appropriate practice strategies to empower American Indians and handle this complex issue, recognizing its importance. Recognizing that injustice affects entire communities and perpetuates inequality is crucial. The essay examines this issue's many facets to demonstrate the need for culturally sensitive approaches that respect American Indians' distinct historical and cultural circumstances. This study proposes building and applying culturally competent practice models to reduce oppression and build resilience in American Indian communities.
Structure for Culturally Competent Practice Models: Using the Social Ecological Model
Problem Statement
The subject under consideration pertains to the persistent subjugation experienced by American Indian communities, which encompasses a diverse range of complex obstacles. These communities have been significantly affected by historical determinants, namely colonization, dispossession, and cultural suppression, which have collectively shaped a narrative of systemic disadvantage. Beyond individual experiences, this oppression is intricately intertwined with systemic and environmental factors on a larger scale.
American Indian communities, being the central focus of this issue, are situated at the crossroads of present-day inequities and past injustices. Prior efforts to resolve these concerns have proven inadequate, as they frequently focused on specific elements rather than addressing the problem. Given the historical backdrop and persistent obstacles, the necessity for a comprehensive intervention is apparent, which necessitate a nuanced and integrated strategy to effectuate significant and enduring transformation.
Assumptions and Underlying Philosophy
Acknowledging historical and cultural influences is fundamental to the intervention model's philosophy. Assuming that historical injustices are the fundamental cause of oppression, any intervention must be culturally sensitive and cognizant of the distinctive experiences of American Indian communities. The philosophical stance espouses the notion that resolutions ought to be propelled by the community while upholding the autonomy and agency of American Indian tribes and individuals.
Constructivism and Postmodernism Theory