Netherlands Health care versus USA Health care

Netherlands versus the USA
Student Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course ID
Instructor’s Name
Due Date
Netherlands Health care versus USA Health care
Abstract
The quantity of resources a nation apportioned for health care diverges grounded on its social, economic, and political structure. Both the US and the Netherlands were wealthy countries. The Netherlands is highly populated/ overpopulated. According to the National Statistics Netherlands (CBS), the Dutch population by the end of 2020 was 17 134 872. Its size in terms of km2 is smaller than West Virginia, while the US population by the end of 2020 was 331 million. The Dutch GDP by 2019 was US $ 907.1 billion, while the US GDP by 2019 was US $ 21. 43 trillion (Morgan, Gmeinder & Wilkens, 2017). From the statistics, both nations have the potential to finance their health care heavily properly. However, the US is a capitalist country, but the Dutch rides and thrives on socialism. Economically, the Netherlands practices socialism, while the USA is a capitalist nation; however, they both belong to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Although, each country has a way of leading its sectors regardless of economic variances. The amount that the United States spends on health care on each citizen overrides that of the Netherlands, but the quality of health care offered by the Dutch is better than the United States.
Introduction
Healthcare is such a crucial sector in a nation; the citizens’ lives profoundly rely on it. When the health care department encounters a challenge like during the pandemic, particularly under underprivileged management, the entire section is destined to influence society adversely. Someway, life expectancy depends on the management of the healthcare sector in a nation. There is realism in admitting that both developed and developing nations have issues with their healthcare sections.
However, it might not be the case when comparing the Netherlands and the US—both countries belong to the same category, Global North, regarding economic capability. The variations may somehow exist in terms of administration differences. Also, a discrepancy may rely on the constitutional system and the administrative structure. Hence, contributing to disparities in the leadership and quality of their health care. For instance, one may discover that healthcare in the Netherlands health care is universal coverage. Simultaneously, the US provides health care to its inhabitants via health assurance obtained from contracting private insurance organizations for medical cover. For instance, in 2019, the US spending on health care on every individual was the US $ 11 100. A more than any OECD nation, the Netherlands is an affiliate (Morgan, Gmeinder & Wilkens, 2017). The Dutch spent only 80.9 billion euros in 2019. Unimaginably, the quality of health care offered in the Dutch health facilities is better than the Americans despise its expense on health. Thus, in this literature, we will acquire in-depth information regarding comparing Dutch healthcare and US healthcare.
Comparison between the health system of the United States and the Netherlands
The Netherlands offers universal health care coverage to its citizens; however, about a third of the Dutch population owns private health insurance. Also, the Dutch administration plays a significant role in directing charges, and capacity is nominal. It has submitted to an oversight responsibility, sparing a chance for competition in the health care sector; hence, it guarantees quality. On the other sides, the United States has been at the top in spending on health care, though its healthcare system is not universal like that of the Dutch. The Netherlands health care structure operates on the foundation of universal private assurance, headed by a statutory organ. The coverage is mainly funded by the general tax, community-rated assurance premiums, and car-marked payroll tax. The quality of services is checked and balanced by the presence of competition and regulation.
The responsibility of the government in health care
The health care scheme in the Netherlands is universal; the Dutch admin takes the lion's share in funding. Due to an enacted policy, the Social Security Act of 1938; allows the private sector to obtain sustenance (Wammes et al., 2019). The New Zealand Health Strategy, an entity tasked with oversight work in setting goals and service necessities. Likewise, the body is accountable for determining the funding of public health annual spending. On the other hand, US health care receives finances from private medical insurers, the government, and individuals. The US national government only funds approximately one-half of the entire medical expenditure.
Moreover, the US health care system is based on privatization. Every US healthcare package has pursued a supervisory style to certain levels. Some of the programs responsible for healthcare bill settlement through privatization are Medicare, SCHIP, Medicaid, and others; the federal administration regulates how they operate. Medicare is funded by a merger of general national taxes, a compulsory payroll tax that settles hospice assurance, and personal premiums.
Similarly, both governments provide access to health care to their populaces. All the permanent inhabitants in both countries have access to a diversity of services, with some assistance from health insurance. However, the nonresidents settle their medical bills fully since they lack government health care coverage. In the Netherlands, a nonresident can receive medical services except the treatment is associated with an accident. Such a plan is ...