How Mental Illness is Often a Consideration in the Criminal Justice System
This assignment will center on how mental illness is often a consideration in the criminal justice system.
Review: Module 15: “Contemporary Issues in Psychopathology” in your textbook.
Abrams, A. (2017, May 25). The catastrophic effects of mental health stigma: Transforming a broken system. https://www(dot)psychologytoday(dot)com/us/blog/nurturing-self-compassion/201705/the-catastrophic-effects-mental-health-stigma
Bao, J. (2020, March 9). Prisons: The new asylums. Harvard Political Review. https://harvardpolitics(dot)com/prisons-the-new-asylums/
Bellesheim, K. R. (2016). Ethical challenges and legal issues for mental health professionals working with family caregivers of individuals with serious mental illness. Ethics & Behavior, 26(7), 607–620. https://libauth(dot)purdueglobal(dot)edu/login?url=https://search(dot)ebscohost(dot)com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=118030232&site=eds-live
John du Pont — Foxcatcher Murder
On January 26, 1996, billionaire John du Pont, a financial supporter and enthusiast of U.S. wrestling, killed Olympic gold medalist wrestler David Schultz at his Team Foxcatcher wrestling facility on his estate. After the killing, du Pont barricaded himself in his home for two days, eventually being arrested. The murder appeared to be without motive or provocation, and many who knew du Pont were reportedly shocked by his behavior.
du Pont pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity. Experts for the defense testified that du Pont was a paranoid schizophrenic who believed Schultz was involved in a plot to kill him. Two forensic psychologists hired by the prosecution testified that du Pont indeed suffered from mental illness, but was aware of the wrongfulness of the act of killing.
The jury rejected his plea of not guilty by reason of insanity, finding him guilty of third-degree murder and simple assault under Pennsylvania's guilty but mentally ill statutory scheme. He was sentenced to 13–30 years in prison. John du Pont died at the Laurel Highlands State Prison while serving out his sentence.
Prosecuting district attorney Patrick Meehan was happy with the victory but called it a shallow one, noting, "It's a shame because over the last month we saw a tremendous amount of resources, especially of a psychiatric nature, that was available to this man, and many people who alleged to be his friends. And it's tragic there wasn't some intervention before the killing of David Schultz because the criminal justice system was left to pick up the pieces" (Vigoda & Ordine, 2014, par.14).
Vigoda, R., Ordine, B. (2014, November 20). du Pont is guilty but mentally ill. The Philadelphia Inquirer. https://www(dot)inquirer(dot)com/philly/news/DU_PONT_IS_GUILTY_BUT_MENTALLY_ILL.html
As you learned in this week’s unit, the term “insanity” is a legal, rather than psychological, concept. After reviewing Chapter 15 in your text on the legal and ethical issues regarding criminal commitment, complete the following:
Select a news story about a criminal case where the defendant used the “not guilty by reason of insanity” defense.
Write a 2-page essay (not counting title and reference page) incorporating the following:
Overview of the case story: In 2–3 paragraphs, provide an overview of the case story.
Not guilty by insanity defense: In at least two paragraphs, explain whether it is difficult for the defendant in the chosen story to be found not guilty by insanity in a court of law. Discuss how it was determined whether a mental illness affected the individual’s ability to know right from wrong at the time the crime was committed.
Ethical issues: In at least two paragraphs, discuss any ethical concerns that pertain to the chosen case story.
Abnormal Psychology
Student's Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Details
Date Of Submission
Abnormal Psychology
Overview of The Case Story
In 2015, a woman named Carol Coronado stabbed her three daughters, ages 2, 16 months, and two months, to death at her home in California. According to reports, Coronado had a history of postpartum depression and struggled with mental health issues (Laufer, 2021). After the killings, she was arrested and charged with three counts of murder.
Not Guilty By The Insanity Defense
Coronado's defense team argued that she had postpartum psychosis at the time of the killings, which made her unable to distinguish right from wrong. They claimed that her actions resulted from her mental illness and that she should not be held responsible for them (Murderpedia. Nd). However, the prosecution argued that Coronado was fully aware of her actions and had even cleaned up the crime scene afterward, indicating that she knew what she had done was wrong (Murderpedia. Nd). In California, the "not guilty because of insanity" defense requires the defendant to prove that they could not understand the nature and quality of their actions or that they could not distinguish right from wrong at the time of the crime (Murderpedia. Nd). This is a high bar to meet. In Coronado's case, the jury ultimately rejected her insanity defense and found her guilty of first-degre...