Essay Sample Content Preview:
Implications of the Indian Arts and Crafts Act on Small Indian Groups
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Implications of the Indian Arts and Crafts Act on Small Indian Groups
The sovereignty of Native American tribes in the US is one of the hallmarks of co-existence and freedom. At present, there are a number of Native American tribes in the US, all of which are considered independent and self-governing, with elaborate executive, legislative, and judicial structures. As such, many of the internal conflicts that arise within such tribes are often resolved through these avenues, which further emphasizes the tribe’s sovereignty (Bailey & Sturtevant, 2008). However, the Cherokee tribe has been making headlines both presently and historically regarding its view on tribal citizenship and membership of the Cherokee Freedmen. This tribe and its leadership have displayed varied opinions over the years regarding the membership of the Cherokee Freedmen. Most recently, this has resulted in the exclusion of thousands of descendants of the Cherokee Freedmen from the tribal rolls for failure of meeting a blood quantum, which has become a serious matter with legal, social, and political implications (Conley, 2014; Kuckkahn, n.d). In addition to this problem, the development of the Indian Arts and Crafts Act in 1990 has dealt a huge blow to a significant number of Indians that desire to create art. A similar problem plagues the Duwamish people, who are still searching for federal recognition even after 25 years of trying to attain it (Kuckkahn, n.d). This law inadvertently makes it illegal for any Indian that is not officially registered in the scrolls of their tribe to effectively create and sell any kind of art, seeing as it will be inevitably perceived as a slight on the Indian people and their culture. At the same time, this act fails to provide clauses that address the plight of groups such as the Cherokee Freedmen, many of whom until today are struggling to obtain official recognition within their tribes.
In essence, this act makes it illegal for any of the Cherokee Freedmen to actively create and sell Cherokee art, seeing as they are technically not officially recognized by their community. This paper looks to explore this issue from a holistic perspective and hopefully, develop some potential solutions that could help solve the problem of surrounding the creation and sale of art by Indians that lack the tribal membership of the Cherokee Freedmen.
First off, it must be acknowledged that this act in its entirety denies small groups of Native Indians that are not officially registered the freedom to express themselves through their arts and crafts. At present, the descendants of many Cherokee Freedmen are suffering from a tribal excommunication of sorts as a result of their heritage, something that they have completely nothing to do with. During the American Civil War, the Cherokee tribe chose to align with the Confederacy, which was against the law established by the Union under which these tribes lived (Lawson, 2013). As such, their rebellion was seen as a spite of sorts on the Union, and in order to remedy this situation, the government ordered that all Freedmen in Cherokee territory should be granted membership and rights similar to those native Cherokees are given (May, 2016). While this appears somewhat harsh, it served to reaffirm the position of the Union as the governing entity in the American states.
However, it is also necessary that one understands the position that the Cherokee were put in during the breakout of the Civil War. As a tribe, the Cherokee were sovereign, but this did not guarantee their safety in the Civil War (May, 2016). As any leader would, the Tribal Councils of the Five Civilized Tribes chose to support the Confederacy to ensure their safety and protection during the Civil War, and also because much of the Indian Territory at the time was located in an area that was predominantly confederate (Denson, 2004). Hence it becomes difficult to blame the Five Civilized Tribes for siding with the Confederacy, seeing as this was partly facilitated by the need to guarantee the safety of the tribes. From this perspective, it becomes quite clear that the Indian Arts and Crafts Act is not only justified but that it works to protect the Indian community from imposters selling off non-authentic Indian art and crafts.
However, it must also be understood that when the treaty of 1866 was passed, it essentially marked the end of slavery and the inclusion of the Freedmen into the Cherokee and other tribes (Chavez, 2006). Hence choosing to alter the tribal constitution many decades later in order to alienate specific portions of the tribal population is not only moving backward but also highly unconstitutional. Moreover, the fact that the Dawes Rolls separated the Freedmen from the Native Cherokees further fueled this problem, seeing as the Freedmen had been alienated on the basis of blood quantum, a provision that had not been established in the Treaty of 1866 when all Freedmen were incorporated into the Cherokee tribe (Lawson, 2013; May, 2016; Kuckkahn, n.d). While the initial decision to include the Freedmen in the Cherokee tribal rolls may have been a punishment to the Cherokee Nation from the Union for siding with the Confederacy, it in no way alienates the rights of tribal memberships and participation that were guaranteed to the ancestors of the present Cherokee Freedmen through the Treaty of 1866. The rules established for determining membership among Indian tribes are typically unfair, and do little to navigate the complex membership issues surrounding individuals looking to gain membership, as well as those looking to be defined as Indian artists (Kuckkahn, n.d). This is a critical point that must be understood in order to comprehend the injustice perpetrated by the failure of this act to include provisions surrounding such minority groups among the Indians.
As such, the right to tribal membership for the Cherokee Freedmen is not a debatable point, more so because these rights were guaranteed and protected by the treaty signed in 1866, ensu...