Justification report - Part II
Assignment 2.2: Justification Report – Part 2
In Part 1 of your Justification Report assignment, you built up the following sections: Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods. In Part 2, you will revise Part 1 based on your instructor’s suggestions and add to it the following sections: Evaluation of Alternatives, Findings and Analysis, and References.
Use the basic outline below to draft your paper. Organize your responses to each question under the following section headings:
Evaluation of Alternatives (for Questions 1-3)
Findings and Analysis (for Questions 4-5)
References (for Question 6)
Write a two (2) page, single-spaced report in which you:
Research the two (2) alternatives (i.e. possible solutions) that you’ve identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Record bibliographic information during research.
Example: You might research other organizations that have attempted similar solutions to the problem you have identified and explore the results of those experiments.
Use what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.
Example: If your research revealed that four companies similar to yours increased productivity after allowing their workers to telework from home three days per week, you might conclude that one of your suggested alternatives – in this case, the option to telework from home three days per week – satisfies one of your criterion of “Productivity” as a high-potential solution to a problem you’ve identified (of decreased worker morale and productivity at Doe’s Electronics). However, additional research might frustrate a recommendation of this alternative if it is found to fall short of other criteria while a second alternative fares better. For instance, a telework alternative might be found to be too costly to implement; too frustrating for consumers who prefer daily, in-person customer service; or too divergent from the company’s brand, “Always there for you!”
Organize the assignment by your criteria. Explain in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Next, explain how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.
Example: An abbreviated outline of what this longer section might look like based on the above example is below (Note: Only the first two [2] of five [5] required criteria are included to give you a feel for the structure). Your researched findings, represented as circled bullets below, should be explained in two to five (2-5) sentences. Include in-text citations and follow up with References in APA style):
Evaluation of Alternatives
Productivity
Alternative A: Telework from home 3 days per week
{narrate findings based on research article 1 here}
{narrate findings based on research article 2 here}
Alternative B: Offer two extra Floating Holidays to each employee per year
{narrate findings based on research article 3 here}
Cost
Alternative A: Telework from home 3 days per week
{narrate findings based on research article 1 here}
{narrate findings based on research article 2 here}
Alternative B: Offer two extra Floating Holidays to each employee per year
{narrate findings based on research article 3 here}
{narrate findings based on research article 4 here}
Briefly summarize in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternatives section.
Include a chart like the ones below to illustrate at a glance:
Figure 1: Alternatives Analyzed by Criteria
Criteria
Telework Option
Floating Holiday Option
Productivity
Very high
Negligible increase
Cost
Very high
Moderate
Company Image
Increased
Negligible increase
Worker Morale
Increased
Negligible increase
Practicality
Moderate
Low
TOTAL Feasibility* of Alternatives based on Criteria?
Moderate to High
Low to Moderate
*Feasability = Capability of an alternative being carried out with success
Include an APA style (6th edition) References page that documents the one (1) primary source and three (3) secondary sources that you used and cited in-text in your Evaluation of Alternatives section. Remember that both in-text citations and References must be included (to avoid plagiarism) whenever you are directly quoting, summarizing, or paraphrasing researched material.
Your assignment must:
Be typed, single spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Support ideas or claims in body paragraphs with clear details, examples, and explanations.
Organize ideas logically by using transitional words, phrases, and sentences.
Use sentence variety and effective word choice in written communication.
Apply writing process strategies to develop formal business reports and / or proposals.
Use technology and information resources to research issues related to selected topics.
Write clearly and concisely using proper writing mechanics.
Justification Report-Part II
Name:
Institution
Justification Report-Part II
After visiting several countries, I was able to compose a report from my research on the worth of the two proposals proffered to the board of health in a bid to contain the alarming rates of child maternal mortality in the country. My criterion involved the evaluation of the cost, effectiveness, practicability, duration of implementation and durability of each program. Our researchers visited Australia and Sweden to study their subsidy program and compared it to the Zambian and South African programs of imparting skills to the Traditional Birth Attendants.
Duration of Implementation
Australia offered a superb benchmark for countries that have successfully lowered their child delivery maternal mortality over years by sustaining a program of child delivery subsidy. This has formed a benchmark from where they have been in position to attract over 64% of pregnant women to public hospitals. The cost of child delivery in Australian public hospitals is shared between a mother and government. Because Australian hospitals have quality medical facilities and services, they can reduce perinatal deaths by 44% over 35 years since 1973 when they started implementing the program (Brown, 2012). Research prospects another 51% decline in the perinatal deaths from 2005 to 8.5 per 1000 live births by 2015. Maternal deaths are also as low as 8.5 per 100000 births pitting most other OECD countries. Sweden too with such a program was able to lower their maternal deaths from 300 deaths per 10000 live births in the 19th century to less than 10 in the 21st century (Dizon-Ross, Dupas, & Robinson, 2013).
Alternatively a visit to Zambia explored on the recruited and incorporated traditional Birth attendants (TBAs) in the health sector. Zambia’s 99% child and mother deaths during delivery were as a result of unskilled TBAs delivering in the villages. In a period of three months, the country embarked their TBAs on lessons entailing hygiene, tackling complications and perinatal mother and child care. Zambia trained 16,000 traditional skilled attendants who are now capable of delivering babies even at the comfort of their villages. Zambia has been able to lower child maternal mortality by 60% over two decades. In South Africa, that has amongst highest prevalence of mother-child HIV transmission, TBA were taught in four months on how to use drugs on pregnant women during birth to prevent this transfer. They lowered their transmission rate to as low as in the developed world in a period of two decades (Busia & Kasilo, 2010).
Cost
Subsidies in maternal delivery clinics and hospitals in Australia have allowed even the poorest of Indigenous Australians to access quality child delivery medical services. A fee of $1700 per mother after the subsidy is affordable to most of the Australian citizens, but the government incurs an annual budgetary cost of $6.4 billion. This burden in cost to the government poses a challenge in that the government is only capable of sustaining few delivery wards across the country to the highest capable standards as the OCED countries. Rural areas have few delivery wards, and most poor indigenous Australian women are affected since they have to go extra miles to access these medical facilities. Extrapolating to a developing country, it will be a heavier burden to be shouldered by government in sustaining subsidies (Dizon-Ross, Dupas, & Robinson, 2013).
Training of Traditional Birth Attendant in Zambia cost the government a reasonable $ 400 mil...