Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan
In 750-1,000 words, develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project proposal. You will use the evaluation plan in the Topic 8 assignment, during which you will synthesize the various aspects of your project into a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal
Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:
Discuss the expected outcomes for your evidence-based practice project proposal.
Review the various data collection tools associated with your selected research design and select one data collection tool that would be effective for your research design. Explain how this tool is valid, reliable, and applicable.
Select a statistical test for your project and explain why it is best suited for the tool you choose.
Describe what methods you will apply to your data collection tool and how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool you selected.
Propose strategies that will be used if outcomes do not provide positive or expected results.
Describe the plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation.
Refer to the "Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview" document, located in Class Resources for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.
You are required to cite a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Complete the "APA Writing Checklist," located in Class Resources, to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.
Title
Your Name
Subject and Section
Professor’s Name
Date
Evaluation Plan
Expected Outcomes
The project aspires to contribute significantly to scientific knowledge by utilizing a robust Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) design. This approach seeks to unearth valuable insights into the effectiveness of interventions designed to address nurse burnout, thus bolstering the foundation of healthcare research (Deaton & Cartwright, 2018). Ethical considerations remain paramount, with a steadfast commitment to obtaining informed consent from participants and adhering to stringent patient data protection standards, including compliance with HIPAA regulations (Edemekong et al., 2018).
Data Collection Tool
The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), specifically, the 16-item General MBI (MBI-GS) and the 22-item Health Services Personnel (MBI-HSS) survey shall be used (Knox et al., 2018).
Validity
MBI-GS. The Average Variance Extracted (AVE) values triumph above the 0.50 mark (0.60, 0.58, and 0.55, respectively) for the three constructs—emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and professional efficacy. The ethereal heights of these AVE values and the bewilderingly high CFC values fortify the enigmatic nature of the MBI-GS's convergent validity in this intricate study (Bravo et al., 2021).
MBI-HSS. Employing an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) outcome led to the formulation of a refined three-factor model, accounting for 56.3% of the total variance. This underscores the MBI-HSS's commendable construct validity (Al Mutair et al., 2020).
Reliability