Submit a 1- to 2-page analysis of your reflection on the media scenario presented this week.

Title Your Name Subject and Section Professor’s Name Date Key Learnings My learning from the challenges can be summarized by understanding the importance of balance in dealing with corporate influence in university contexts. Although corporations can bring valuable resources, inherent corporate interests often collide with academic missions that result from the search for the good of society. The first challenge raised the ethical dilemma of this balance, focusing on the fact that if universities allow such spaces for exploration, they will relinquish control of what goes on behind the doors of the corporation, and secondly, the reputations of the universities could be tarnished due to unethical business practices. Conversely, the second challenge revealed issues regarding student research partnerships with corporations. Potential problems from corporate sponsorship and involvement involve the risk of research being influenced by corporate direction and requirements and the lack of proper supervision and approval mechanisms to ensure academic quality and responsibility. Types of Change The issue described in Challenge 1 is a proactive change. This classification has been made about perceived difficulties the university might encounter because of corporate influence in the curriculum (Chan et al., 2022). Proactivity is visible regarding the university's approach to engaging the faculty as actual change agents and assembling a diverse panel to steer this process (Vogt et al., 2021; Gagné et al., 2014). In this way, the university tries to avoid possible conflicts of interest while focusing on society's benefits of adherence to scientific and ethical standards. These proactive measures deal with the ethical issues and potential reputational loss due to a partnership with the wrong company before...