100% (1)
page:
7 pages/≈1925 words
Sources:
-1
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 30.24
Topic:

Chest pain

Case Study Instructions:
CASE STUDY: You are a registered nurse (RN) working in a small coastal town hospital with a picturesque view of the ocean. It's a tranquil day when a woman named Gladys, in her early fifties, arrives at the emergency department accompanied by her concerned husband. Gladys is visibly distressed and clutching her chest. She explains that she has been experiencing severe chest pain for the past hour, which began shortly after enjoying a meal at a local seafood restaurant. Gladys describes the pain as a burning sensation in her chest that radiates to her back. She also mentions that she's had occasional episodes of heartburn and regurgitation lately, particularly when lying down. She adds that she's been feeling increasingly short of breath and that her breathing worsens when she takes deep breaths. Your primary responsibilities include: 1. Primary Assessment and Monitoring: Assess Glady's vital signs, including heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation. Continuously monitor her cardiac rhythm through an ECG. Assess her level of consciousness and pain. 2. Provide Oxygen Therapy: Ensure that Gladys receives adequate oxygen therapy to improve oxygenation and relieve chest pain. 3. Pain Management: Administer pain relief as ordered by the doctor, which may include antacids to address reflux symptoms. 4. Differential Diagnosis Consideration: Given the possibility of reflux, a heart attack, and pulmonary embolism as differential diagnoses, assess vital signs and symptoms to differentiate between these conditions. 5. Emotional Support and Communication: Communicate effectively with Gladys and her husband, addressing their concerns. Keep them informed about the situation. 6. Collaboration with the Healthcare Team: Collaborate with the medical team to make decisions regarding further assessments and interventions based on the clinical presentation, via an ISBAR tool communication. 7. Continuous Monitoring and Documentation: Monitor Glady's condition continuously, document all assessments, interventions, and responses, and communicate effectively with the healthcare team. Vital Sign Measurement Interpretation Temperature 37.2 Slightly elevated, possibly due to stress or inflammation Pulse Rate 120 beats/min Elevated heart rate, consistent with potential heart attack or pulmonary embolism Resp. Rate 30 breaths/min Increased respiratory rate, indicating respiratory distress, which aligns with potential pulmonary embolism Blood Pressure 160/95 mmHg Elevated blood pressure, indicating cardiac strain or hypertension Sp02 92% on room air Decreased oxygen saturation on room air, suggest possible oxygen exchange issues, commonly seen in pulmonary embolism. BSL 8.0 mmol/L Normal blood glucose level, not indicative of any specific condition. Pain Score 7 Moderate chest pain, could be related to heart attack or reflux. GCS 15 Normal level of conciousness TASK: This task requires you to write a paper that addresses four (4) stages of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle (CRC): Processing and Interpreting; Establishing Goals; Identifying Issues and Takes Action; and Evaluate Care. For each section, please use the stage of the CRC as your subheading and do the following: 1. Processing & interpreting: Identifying and interpreting the following assessment findings by circling or highlighting your choice; normal or abnormal parameters, if it raises concerns, if its potential cardiac or non-cardiac relation, the need for nursing intervention, and the predicted outcomes for the patient within the case study. 2. Establish goals: Establish goals: formulate one SMART goal relevant to the case study based on the nursing assessments (neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory, or endocrine) Make sure you use the SMART goal format subheadings in your response. Support your response with insights from Levett-Jones (2023) and any relevant literature or research. 3. Identifying issues & takes action: Identify two(2) examples of evidence-based nursing interventions, based on your SMART goals that were created from the following nursing assessments: neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory, or endocrine – that you as the registered nurse could do within this case study. Utilising your clinical knowledge and referring to literature and research to guide your clinical reasoning as you continue to assess the patient’s condition. 4. Evaluate care: How does the evaluation of outcomes play a crucial role in the clinical reasoning cycle for a nurse? Discuss the significance of re-examining both objective and subjective data to assess the effectiveness of your nursing interventions, integrating research and literature within your response. 5. You do not need to provide an introduction or a conclusion for this task, however, it must be written using professional and academic language, and be presented in structured paragraphs written in the third person. Clinical Reasoning Cycle: SMART goal: The SMART goal is a simplified format to direct and drive goal setting. It stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time-bound. When writing your assessments, the marking rubric outlines for the SMART goal format with the use of subheadings. This is achieved by structuring your response in the following way: Specific: Measurable: Achievable: Relevant: Time-bound: Instructions: • Each paragraph must have at least 2 references including intext citations • Full reference list at the end in APA 7 style • Where possible, Australian based research • Each paragraph must have: 1. Topic sentence/Introduction 2. Evidence – Examples that support your ideas 3. Analysis – How/why? 4. Linking paragraph to the next This paper must be at least 1800 words
Case Study Sample Content Preview:
Title Your Name Subject and Section Professor’s Name Date Processing and Interpreting Abnormal Findings The client presented with moderate chest pain rated as 7/10. This is the most pressing issue in this case. Other abnormal findings include increased heart rate (120 beats per minute) and respiratory rate (30 breaths per minute) and elevated blood pressure at 160/95mmHg (Nischal & Madan, 2020; Johns Hopkins Medicine, n.d.). Given these abnormal parameters, the cardiac origin of chest pain must be excluded. Three differential diagnoses must be considered. First, the patient might be suffering from a non-cardiac cause, such as a gastrointestinal reflux disease (GERD), which is one of the most common causes of non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) and accounts for 30% of the causes of acute chest pain (Gulati et al., 2021; Johnson & Ghassemzadeh, 2024). This presents with atypical chest pain that often has higher intensity. It is characterized by chest and epigastric pain, cough, and asthma, which may be perceived as difficulty breathing (Antunes et al., 2023). Consequently, cardiac causes must be excluded in patients presenting with acute chest pain because these are often fatal if not provided with prompt action and appropriate treatment. Some differentials include acute coronary syndrome (ACS), which accounts for 31% of the cases, and pulmonary embolism (PE), which accounts for 2% of the cases in the emergency department (Johnson & Ghassemzadeh, 2024). Jameson (2018) explained that ACS presents as an acute chest pain that increases in intensity with time. It is described as something pressing the chest at the substernal area. Moreover, it is often diffuse and not localized at a single point (i.e., the patient cannot point the pain using a single finger), and it may or may not be precipitated by exertion. The suspicion for ACS is also heightened by the lack of pain relief after ten minutes, particularly with the administration of sublingual nitroglycerin. In this case, the patient has been experiencing acute, moderate chest pain for an hour precipitated by eating foods (seafood) that are usually the cause of an abrupt increase in blood pressure. Hence, ACS must be ruled out. Lastly, the patient had sudden chest pain despite resting, accompanied by desaturation at 92% at room air. This signifies a probable obstruction in the airway, which gives a differential of PE. Failure of diagnosis results in a high mortality rate, accounting for 30% if not treated immediately. It presents tachycardia, chest pain, difficulty breathing, and decreased oxygen availability to the tissues. In some cases, it can be seen as a case of obstructive shock (Howard, 2019; Freund et al., 2022). All of these are also present in the case given. Nursing Intervention Upon diagnosis, the nurse's role becomes crucial in preventing the patient from succumbing to her illness. Electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring is vital in evaluating patients with acute chest pain with typical or atypical presentation. This will show old areas of ischemia and recent myocardial infarction (MI) (Mechanic et al., 2023). The critical findings that must be observed include ST-segment elevation or depression in at least two contiguous leads. ACS-STE must be observed as at least 2mm elevation in chest leads (v1-v6) or at least 1mm elevation in the limb leads (I, II, III, aVL or aVF). For non-STE ACS, at least 1mm ST depression must be observed in any leads or T wave inversion of at least 5mm (Jameson, 2018). The nurse's role is also essential in monitoring the patient's vital signs, as the situation might worsen. Predicted Patient Outcomes Patient outcomes mainly depend on prompt diagnosis and treatment. The prognosis will depend on the complications that may or may not be present in the patient in the emergency room. These include arrhythmia and pump failure. Patients with STE-ACS deemed eligible for reperfusion strategies (i.e., percutaneous coronary insertion) to ensure adequate blood flow to the myocardial tissues should be under the procedure in less than two hours (door-to-balloon time). If identified correctly in a minimal time, the patient may achieve reperfusion without significant damage to the myocardium. In the emergency department, once the diagnosis has been established, if this is a case of ACS, the patient must receive anti-thrombotic agents such as aspirin, and the nurse in charge must administer oxygen to prevent further hypoxemia since the patient's oxygen saturation is only 92% at room air. Consequently, pain management must also be done since the patient is experiencing moderate chest pain to prevent aggravating the condition (Jameson, 2018; Frisch et al., 2020). Clinical Reasoning Cycle: Establishing SMART Goals Objective No. 1 Specific The nurse in charge shall do regular cardiac monitoring, with the provision of oxygen therapy per nasal cannula at three litres per minute (3 lpm), and to assess the intensity of chest pain to keep vital signs within normal limits and to reduce discomfort for the next six hours and to prevent the deterioration of the patient’s case (Jameson, 2018). Measurable Vital signs will be monitored every hour, particularly for the presence of abnormal rhythms in the heart rate, via the cardiac monitor to prevent one of the most fatal complications of ACS, which is arrhythmia. Oxygen saturation should also be maintained above 94%, and hypertension should be prevented (Jameson, 2018). Achievable The nurse in charge should ensure the timely introduction of medications and coordinate with other healthcare team members by updating the patient's situation. Relevant Consistent and timely evaluation is vital for the nurse in charge to allow for timely intervention. Time-Bound The assessment and care nurses provide the patient should be completed within the next 6 hours of continuous nursing care, starting from the evaluation to stabilization. Objective No. 2 Specific The nurse in charge will do a comprehensive assessment of the patient after the first 24 hours of admission to check on her mental and emotional states and her family. Measurable The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) shall be employed to identify the stakeholders' emotional and mental distress levels (Wynne et al., 2020). Achievable A mandatory training session for all nurses in the emergency department to administer the HADS assessment tool and seminars for all members of the emergency department team shall ensue to coordinate efforts with a multidisciplinary team (Wynne et al., 2020). Relevant Harlan et al. (2020) ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Sign In
Not register? Register Now!