Describe Why The Immigration Is A Good Police For America

OUTLINE
THESIS: Immigration is a good policy for America as the reforms would spur economic growth, create businesses and strengthen national security.
* Immigration policy would encourage economic growth by boosting gross domestic product (GDP) by 4.8 percent and the nation’s productivity by 1 percent in two decades (Engler)
* U.S. employment and wage rates are projected to increase with the adoption of immigration reforms (Mathews).
* According to Bipartisan Policy Center, immigration policy will have a powerful effect on easing the nation’s massive fiscal encounters, estimating that the federal deficits would decline by at least $1.2 trillion within the next two decades (Engler).
* Immigration creates businesses, thus making the U.S. economy robust
* According to the Partnership for a New American Economy, immigrants are 50 percent more probable to start new businesses compared to native Americans (Engler). New businesses will create jobs and introduce more customers into the U.S. supply chain, thus generating more revenues (Malik, Niemeyer & Ruwadi).
* A number of CEOs and senior executives of leading companies in the U.S. immigrated to the country (Hansen, Ibarra & Peyer). These immigrants or their children and have immensely contributed to job creation and the overall economic growth of the nation (Roberts).
* In order to enhance national security, a working immigration system needs to be put in place to make the American economy stronger (Meissner, Kerwin, Chishti and Bergeron).
* Treating everyone with dignity will ensure that the rule of law is upheld (UN.org)
* Immigration policy will ensure the allocation of resources to detain and deport individuals that pose threat to public safety (Human Rights Watch)
Why the Immigration is a Good Policy for America
Introduction
A survey conducted in 2011 showed that half of the top fifty companies funded by venture capital had at least one founder who is an immigrant to the United States and three quarters had immigrants on the top positions I either management or running research fields (Penn Wharton University of Pennsylvania). Today, the United States remains to be home to the largest population of immigrants globally. While the rate of immigrant assimilation in the United States is faster compared to other developed European countries, immigration policy has increasingly become a contentious issue in the modern days. America needs to unite everyone, regardless of their political affiliation. In order to achieve this, there should be greater growth and investment, with the creation of more job opportunities for all Americans. Most Americans would agree that a majority of elected leaders are either unable or unwilling to address the most pressing issues that the country faces. However, business leaders have demonstrated unity while tacking the issue of fixing the immigration system in the United States for the long term (Engler). The intentions of this trend are clear and powerful. Work on immigration reform would give the government to show Americans that policy makers can unite in solving major problems facing the nation and boost the American’s economy. This essay argues that immigration is a good policy for America as the reforms would spur economic growth, create businesses, and strengthen national security.
Immigration Policy and Economic Growth
Immigration policy would encourage economic growth by boosting gross domestic product (GDP) by 4.8 percent and the nation’s productivity by 1 percent in two decades (Engler). According to Business Roundtable, the U.S. economy is projected to expand by an extra 3.9 percent in the next decade as per the baseline status quo, which amounts to an additional (GDP) of $831 billion (Business Roundtable). With this improvement in the nation’s economy, the country is expected to create more than 8 million jobs in the next decade, and this can only be effective if proper immigration policies are implemented
Apart from enhancing the national economy as discussed above, immigration policy is good for America as the U.S. employment and wage rates are projected to increase (Mathews). U.S. immigration policy has remained to be a key area of debate among state and federal policy makers, but one point of disagreement has been on the effect of immigration of the nation’s labor force and the rates of wages of the American workers. As the American economy continues to recover after the Great Recession, the demand for labor force from immigrants will continue to heighten. Therefore, the capacity of the American immigration system to effectively respond to the demands will remain to be a critical economic policy issue for the short term and the long-term strategy for the growth of the country’s economic health (Greenstone & Looney). While most Americans are concerned about the competition immigrant workers will mount on the Americans in the labor force, evidence shows that immigrant workers, on average, increase incomes and opportunities for Americans. Economists argue that immigrants do complement the U.S. workforce, increase the Americans’ productivity and lower prices and increase wage rates in the aggregate (Greenstone & Looney). For instance, low-skilled immigrant workers make it easier for native American contractors, farmers and craftsmen to increase their production, thus expanding the U.S. workers’ incomes and employment rates. Therefore, the adoption of effective immigration policy would see the American wage rates and employment rates increase in the long run.
Besides improved wage rates, immigration policy will have a powerful effect on easing the nation’s massive fiscal encounters, estimating that the federal deficits would decline by at least $1.2 trillion within the next two decades as projected by Bipartisan Policy Center (Engler). While examining the economics of immigration, it is important to consider the fiscal impact of immigration. The taxes that are paid by the immigrants should be compared to the cost the immigrants pose on government spending. Basic economic theory projects that immigration is a powerful means of creating net advantage to the native Americans (Camarota). However, in order this to take action, there will be a redistribution of income from Americans in competition with the immigrants to the labor force that is not in competition and capital owners. The theory also suggests that the size of net advantage will be minimal to the economic size as well as the redistribution size since the less educated and poor Americans are considered to be the most likely to feel the competition heat posed by immigrant workers, and therefore tend to be losers.
Creating Jobs and Businesses
With improved GDP, enhanced economy, and higher wage rates, immigration policy would create massive businesses. Globalization and immigration have always been considered an economic threat to the United States. However, overall, the continued arrival of immigrants to America has been shown to encourage business activity and produce more job. it is argued that the easier it is to access cheap labor from immigrants, the less likely that the American production will be outsourced (Cowen). Studies have shown that as companies move the production sectors oversees, they not only pull away the low-paying jobs, but also a number of other related jobs that includes tech repairmen and high-skilled managers. On the other hand, hiring immigrants for low-paid jobs will help keep a number of jobs in America. The rise of immigration as part of the workforce in the economic sector tends to reduce offshoring. In this perspective, immigration policy would allow for the creation of more jobs and businesses in the United States.
In the line of creating businesses, the Partnership for a New American Economy, provides data that immigrants are 50 percent more probable to start new businesses compared to native Americans (Engler). New businesses will create jobs and introduce more customers into the U.S. supply chain, thus generating more revenues (Malik, Niemeyer & Ruwadi). Immigrants have increasingly been perceived as entrepreneurs who are willing to take risks of starting new businesses, and without the increase of immigrant-owned ventures in the country, the recession would have worsened. Since 1996 to 2011, the rates of business startups by immigrants rose by over 50 percent as those of native born Americans declined at a rate o...