Research paper critique on the attached article

Research Paper Critique on The Attached Article Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation Course Professor Date Research Paper Critique on The Attached Article Introduction Critique is often short paper about a book or an article. It provides information on what the authors investigated, the methods, results, and discussion of the study problem. This critique paper offers significant insights into Tandon et al. (2012) study based on the benchmark sources. Research Problems Benchmark Source: Coughlan et al. (2007) Criteria: A research problem and a persuasive argument for the study's necessity should be provided. The problem addressed by the authors involves the high rates of preterm birth and low birth weight among Hispanic women in the U.S. Regardless of having similar rates to non-Hispanic white women, such rates do not meet the “2010 Healthy People goals” and demonstrate inconsistency across different states (Tandon et al., 2012). This problem significantly builds a convincing argument for the new investigation by underscoring the necessity for an effective intervention to enhance birth outcomes for Hispanic women in the U.S. The problem statement is easy to locate because it is clearly in the last part of the introduction section of the article. It states, "This article presents the CenteringPregnancy impact on low-birth-weight and preterm births." Research Questions and Hypothesis Benchmark Source: Ryan et al. (2007) Criteria: The questions and hypothesis must clearly state a predicted relationship between variables. The main questions of the study include: “Does the CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care model decrease the rate of low-birth-weight neonates among low-income Hispanic women compared to traditional prenatal care?” “Does the CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care model decrease the rate of preterm births among low-income Hispanic women compared to traditional prenatal care?” The hypotheses include: * The CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care ideal will lead to a lower percentage of low-birth-weight neonates compared to traditional prenatal care. * The CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care model will lead to a lower percentage of preterm births compared to traditional prenatal care. The hypothesis states a predicted relationship between the type of prenatal care and the birth outcomes among low-income Hispanic women. Methods Benchmark Source: Cathala & Moorley (2018) Criteria: The study must be approved by an appropriate IRB, informed consent, and follow the specified outlined methodology for a research study. Ethical Aspects of a Study The study by Tandon et al. (2012) was specifically approved and monitored by “the institutional review boards of the Florida Department of Health and the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine” (Tandon et al., 2012). Prior to conducting the interview, all the participants were informed of the study to ensure they were aware of what was to happen during the investigation. Research Design This experiment was a quasi-experiment, where participants were self-selected into either the CenteringPregnancy or traditional prenatal care groups. The focus was from “January 2008 to July 2009 at 2 Palm Beach County, Florida, and other public health clinics” (Tandon et al., 2012). The study was specifically longitudinal because participants were selected from prenatal care initiation through childbirth. The primary threats to the internal validity of the study outcome include selection bias. Selection biases often describe differences between groups in an investigation that relate to the independent variables, such as willingness to participate in the study or motivation or certain demographics of people being mor...