100% (1)
page:
6 pages/≈1650 words
Sources:
4
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 34.99
Topic:

Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Guideline Paper - Schizophrenia

Research Paper Instructions:

1. Introduction: Include an introduction paragraph and a thesis statement at the end of the introductory paragraph. Your thesis statement should be no longer than 1 sentence summarizing the purpose of the paper.1 / 1 point

2. Quantitative Literature: Describe the term quantitative research and how it can be applied to the Advanced Practice Nurse’s (APN’s) practice. Be sure to cite your references. DATA Collection: describe how and what quantitative data you would collect/analyze related to your POI. Example: questionnaire (how) given to nurses on how often they gave a pain medication by selecting frequency on a likert scale (data) 2/ 2 points.

3. Complete the Appraisal Tools and submit to Assignment area: This section (rubric #3) does not need to include any discussion in the paper. (A deduction of 5% will be taken if the wrong tool is selected).

Find 2 different types of quantitative articles/studies related to your POI (at least one-and ONLY one- of your studies should be a meta-analysis or systematic review. Then, critically appraise the 2 chosen articles selected by using the appraisal tools provided (in the link under Step by Step Directions), merge or attach separately the completed appraisal tools to your paper after the matrix. You must complete the tool by addressing each question or comment. Be sure to include the title of the study article on the top of the tool. Include comments for any “no”, “don’t know” or “n/a” answers.4 /4 points

4. Quantitative Meta-analysis or Systematic Review Study Article Discussion: Using the information from your appraisal tool and utilizing one of the Levels of Evidence AND Grades of Recommendation (tools that measure strength and quality of evidence) tools provided, discuss the following: (a) brief overview of study’s purpose and findings, (b) description of studies used in analysis, (c) is the analysis of the data accurate and representative of the question (is bias of any kind present) and (e) levels of evidence and (f) grade of recommendation. Be sure to cite the levels of evidence/grade of recommendation tools used to determine the strength and quality of the evidence. 5/5 points (Review Hall text p. 18-20; Murphy text Ch. 8; Polit text Ch. 29)

5. Quantitative single study article: discuss the following: (a) brief overview of the study’s purpose and findings, (b) study design and methods (c) scientific merit or rigor of the study (validity & reliability factors), (d.) level of evidence, and (e) grade of recommendation. Be sure to cite the levels of evidence/grade of recommendation tools used to determine your strength and quality of the evidence.5 /5 points (Hall p. 9-11; Murphy Ch. 9; Polit Ch. 8 & 10, p. 667-668).

6. Applicability to Practice and Future Research: Based on each appraisal of both studies, discuss how the study’s findings be used in practice or to plan for future research. What gaps have you identified? How does the level of evidence influence your decision to implement findings into practice in both studies? 3 /3 points

7. Conclusion: Provide a summary of the main points of the paper in 1 concluding paragraph. Remember that your conclusion paragraph should not contain any new information that was not presented elsewhere in the paper.1 / 1 point

8. Matrix/Appendix: Merge a thoroughly completed evidence matrix as an appendix. Be sure to appropriately refer your reader to the appendix in the narrative. All studies should be included in the matrix that are used as references in this paper. Bold or highlight the studies that were appraised. 4 /4 points

9. APA deductions or Scholarship Deductions: refer to the APA manual for any page numbers you may be referred to; see the Resources for You section of the course for additional APA assistance. Lack of scholarship up to 20% of the total point value (5 points) may be deducted for any of the following errors: incorrect submission format (not in a pdf, incorrect file name), APA errors, title or reference page errors, incorrect paraphrasing or plagiarism concerns, lack of clarity, conciseness in writing, grammar, spelling, over the page limit, and/or poor overall writing skills.

10. Turnitin Link: Submit your paper to Turnitin. Review the originality report and change any phrases or sentences that you need to. You have the opportunity to re-submit the assignment if needed. Failure to submit to Turnitin by the due date will result in a deduction.

Research Paper Sample Content Preview:
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Guideline Paper- Schizophrenia Name Course Date 1. Introduction To make the diagnosis of Schizophrenia, criteria must be met that are the following according to the diagnostic manual (DSM-V), and researchers have looked into the effectiveness of different approaches to manage schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is a serious mental disorder is often grouped together with psychotic disorders (Velthorst et al., 2015). The quantitative research approach has been used in to minimize subjectivity in studies and research and to justify the validity of its conclusions. Quantitative research can be experimental research or nonexperimental research and in experimental research, the researchers actively introduce an intervention or treatment. On the contrary, in nonexperimental research the researchers do not intervene when collecting the data (Polit & Beck, 2016). This is a quantitative appraise of articles on the effectiveness of interventions to improve outcomes for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders2. Quantitative Literature The first step when using quantitative research for the Advanced Practice Nurse’s (APN’s) practice is formulating and delimiting the problem, which is necessary to conceptualize the problem before determining the research design and collecting data (Polit & Beck, 2016). Studies and research on the effectiveness of interventions in people with schizophrenia compare outcome before and after using different treatments to determine, which are the most effective . The use of medication is the most common, but there is also patient non adherence and there is a need to explore how different approaches help improve adherence and their usefulness when medication does not lead to the expected outcomes (Chien et al., 2014). Quantitative research is a positivist approach where structured and elderly procedures are used to collect data that is then analyzed based using statistics and based on the empirical evidence (Polit& Beck, 2016). “Adherents of positivism assume that nature is basically ordered and regular and that an objective reality exists independent of human observation” (Polit& Beck, 2016, p.14). Using a questionnaire and survey to determine the effectiveness of schizophrenia treatment when psychosocial treatments is used together medication, changes from baseline and improved patient outcomes for the treated subjects would be considered to determine whether the treatment option is viable. 3. Appraisal Tools 1) Gray, R., Bressington, D., Ivanecka, A., Hardy, S., Jones, M., Schulz, M., ... & Chien, W. T. (2016). Is adherence therapy an effective adjunct treatment for patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC psychiatry, 16(1), 90. JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses Name of the article “Is adherence therapy an effective adjunct treatment for patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis”. AuthorGray, R., Bressington, D., Ivanecka, A., Hardy, S., Jones, M., Schulz, M., ... & Chien, W. T Year 2016 Yes No Unclear Not applicable 1 Is the review question clearly and explicitly stated? YYes □ □ □ 2 Were the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question? YYes □ □ □ 3 Was the search strategy appropriate? Yes □ □ □ 4 Were the sources and resources used to search for studies adequate? Yes □ □ □ 5 Were the criteria for appraising studies appropriate? Yes □ □ □ 6 Was critical appraisal conducted by two or more reviewers independently? □ □ Unclear □ 7 Were there methods to minimize errors in data extraction? Yes □ □ □ 8 Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate? Yes □ □ □ 9 Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? Yes □ □ □ 10 Were recommendations for policy and/or practice supported by the reported data? Yes □ □ □ Were the specific directives for new research appropriate? □ □ □ Not applicable Overall appraisal: Include□Exclude□Seek further info □ Source Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey C, Holly C, Kahlil H, Tungpunkom P. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an Umbrella review approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):132-40. The reviewers focused on improving adherence, but did not report on whether the review was undertaken independently. The articles included focused on the effectiveness of effective adjunct treatment and they searched the articles in the MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL with Full Text), Cochrane Library, EMBASE PubMed and Scopus (Gray et al., 2016). The review highlighted that adherence therapy is potentially beneficial to improve adherence and patient outcomes. The researchers also pointed out those studies with missing data are not to be included in reviews because they are incomplete, while there is need for more research to conform the study findings in different settings. There was focus on determining that there were no biases in the choice of RCTs in systematic review and meta analysis. 2) Chien, W. T., Mui, J., Gray, R., & Cheung, E. (2016). Adherence therapy versus routine psychiatric care for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a randomised controlled trial. BMC psychiatry, 16(1), 42. JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials TitleAdherence therapy versus routine psychiatric care for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a randomised controlled trial AuthorChien, W. T., Mui, J., Gray, R., & Cheung, E. Year2016 Yes No Unclear NA Was true randomization used for assignment of participants to treatment groups? Yes □ □ □ Was allocation to treatment groups concealed? □ □ Unclear □ Were treatment groups similar at the baseline? Yes □ □ □ Were participants blind to treatment assignment? Yes □ □ □ Were those delivering treatment blind to treatment assignment? Yes □ □ □ Were outcomes assessors blind to treatment assignment? Yes □ □ □ Were treatment groups treated identically other than the intervention of interest? Yes □ □ □ Was follow up complete and if not, were differences between groups in terms of their follow up adequately described and analyzed? Yes □ □ □ Were participants analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized? Yes □ □ □ Were outcomes measured in the same way for treatment groups? Yes □ □ □ Were outcomes measured in a reliable way? Yes □ □ □ Was appropriate statistical analysis used? Yes □ □ □ Was the trial design appropriate, and any deviations from the standard RCT design (individual randomization, parallel groups) accounted for in the conduct and analysis of the trial? Yes □ □ □ Overall appraisal: IncludeExclude□Seek further info □ treatment groups Sources Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L. Chapter 3: Systematic reviews of effectiveness. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual. The Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017. Available from https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/  In the RCT study there was focus on credibility of the research and the findings were confirmed to show that the data reflected in the findings, but the researchers did not mention whether allocation to a treatment group was concealed. In both articles, the authors discussed interpretations of the findings and looked at similar studies where adherence therapy improves outcomes in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Similarly, validity and reliability, which are standards of scientific rigor, are quality criteria that were prioritized and the research designs were appropriate. 4. Quantitative Meta-analysis or Systematic Review Study Article Discussion Gray, R., Bressington, D., Ivanecka, A., Hardy, S., Jones, M., Schulz, M., ... & Chien, W. T. (2016). Is adherence therapy an effective adjunct treatment for patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC psychiatry, 16(1), 90. * brief overview of study’s purpose and findings The research reviews the effectiveness of adjunct treatment for patients with schizophrenia and such treatments focuses on improving symptoms by enhancing treatment adherence. The researchers included studies where the adjunct treatment was used treatment against the usual or a comparator intervention (Gray, et al., 2016). Adjunct treatment is an effective adjunctive treatment for people with schiz...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Sign In
Not register? Register Now!