100% (1)
page:
12 pages/≈3300 words
Sources:
2
Style:
APA
Subject:
Management
Type:
Other (Not Listed)
Language:
English (U.K.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 51.84
Topic:

Analyse and critically evaluate the company's current corporate strategy (3 parts questions)

Other (Not Listed) Instructions:
This TMA has 3 parts. Before doing so, ensure that you have read the Guidance notes below the questions. It is important to note that all TMAs are applied on one case company which is ‘Whitbread Group PLC’. Your application should be based ONLY on the Materials provided with TMA which is attached. Part 1 Read the documents provided in Part 1 of the ‘Materials’. Analyse and critically evaluate the company’s current corporate strategy. Your answer to this part should be no more than 950 words. (30 marks) Part 2 Based on the analysis that you conducted in Part 1, give advice about potential strategic choices at the corporate level and provide two clear strategic recommendations for the company. Your answer to this part should be no more than 750 words. (20 marks) Part 3 Read the documents provided in Part 3 of the ‘Materials’. Considering one of the industries in which the company is operating, first, analyse the current business strategy it has adopted in that industry and, second, provide two strategic recommendations that can ensure business success in that industry in the future. Finally, consider consistency between your strategic recommendations at corporate and business levels. Your answer to this part should be no more than 1050 words. (35 marks) Part 1 Part 1 asks you to identify and analyse the company’s existing corporate strategy. To approach this part of the TMA, you should rely on, and apply, your study of Block 4. You should start your answer by identifying the strategic choices that the company has made across the years, using evidence from the materials to illustrate specific Block 4 approaches to corporate strategy. From the various aspects of corporate strategy you’ve been introduced to, identify which ones are relevant to the case company. Some examples can be: diversification (Week 19), vertical and/or horizontal integration (Week 18), internationalisation (Week 20), the use of CPA for internationalisation (Week 21). Proceed by discussing only the elements of corporate strategy which are relevant to the case company. Your discussion should offer an analysis of the reasons behind the specific strategic decisions, their advantages and disadvantages and the benefits they offer by using insights from theory in Block 4 and evidence from the Materials. To develop your discussion, you may consider following a reasoning like the discussion of corporate strategy and the application you carried out during tutorial ‘TMA 03 preparation’. Indicatively, if you have identified any instances of vertical or horizontal integration, you may consider the following: What were the drivers? What are any potential benefits and downsides the company might have faced while pursuing the type of integration(s) that you have identified? These are some indicative examples of the steps you can follow to develop your discussion. A good answer will show that you have organised your thoughts into a logical order, that your argument is coherent and supported by evidence drawn from the materials, that you have considered the usefulness of the evidence and how it can be interpreted by the theory to support your answer. Doing so will demonstrate evidence of: 1) critical thinking, 2) understanding of the chosen theoretical concepts and 3) ability to apply these concepts to the case company. Part 2 In this part, you should formulate two recommendations about the company’s corporate strategy, based on the insights you have gained from your study of Block 4 and appropriate evidence from the case study materials. Your recommendations should be informed by and built on the analysis you conducted in Part 1. You may also want to refer to previous TMAs. Indicatively, in preparing your answer you may consider the following points: If your recommendation is to continue to pursue an existing corporate strategy you should explain why that is your recommendation and support the discussion with a solid theoretical grounding and reference to the module frameworks and concepts. Consider the different growth strategies presented in Block 4 Weeks 17, 18, 19 and 20, ranging from vertical integration, to product diversification and internationalisation. For instance, if you want to propose a recommendation on internationalisation, you should think about possible markets that can be targeted for entering or exiting in the next few years. For each recommendation, explain why you made the recommendation with a solid theoretical grounding and reference to the module frameworks and concepts. The above are just indicative and a good answer will show that you have clearly defined the recommendations, making good use of the theoretical frameworks and concepts of Block 4 and of evidence on the case company provided in the Materials. Evaluating critically the recommendations will earn you more marks. Part 3 There are three parts to this question, and you should give them equal importance. In the first part you need to analyse the company’s business strategy in the UK Hotel industry using Porter’s generic strategies framework, which you studied in Week 13 Section 4. The first step is to identify the current business strategy pursued by the company. You can look back at the cost leadership definition and its sources of advantage (Week 13 Sections 6 and 7), at broad differentiation strategy and its characteristics (Week 14, Sections 1, 2 and 3), and at focus strategies (Week 14 Section 3 and its subsections). Having done that, you need to discuss the pros and cons of the strategy chosen by the company. Revising the risks of cost leadership (Week 13 Section 10.1) and broad differentiation (Week 14 Section 2.4) would be helpful. The second part of the question asks you to make two strategic recommendations that can ensure business success in the future. To answer this part of the question you can look back at what you have done in Week 14 Section 5. It is important to explain both what your recommendation is and to discuss why it is appropriate. Your answer needs to combine the evidence from the materials on the case company with theoretical concepts from the module (Weeks 13 and 14). You may demonstrate your recommendations with the aid of the diagram shown in Activity 14.11. A good answer to this part will combine a good analysis of the current business strategy with the strategic recommendations. Finally, in identifying your strategic recommendations at a business level, you should also consider the corporate level recommendations you made in Part 2 of this TMA. The strategic recommendations at the business level should be consistent with the ones at the corporate level. Part 4 Blocks 3 and 4 are about business and corporate strategies. Look back at the summaries you prepared at the end of each week and think about the skills you developed over the period. It may be that they have changed since you wrote the summaries. Use that reflection to identify one main skill you developed. In this part, discuss how you have developed that skill, explaining which activities in Blocks 3 and 4 helped you to do so. As with TMA 01 and 2, you need to take a step back from the content and think about what you have learnt. It is not important that you explain the meaning of the different frameworks and concepts. Your focus should be on how your work on them has helped you in developing your skills. It is important to show an improvement in your ability to reflect on your skills development from your TMA 01 and TMA 02 submission. You may want to refer to your tutor’s feedback on Part 4 of previous TMAs. A good answer to this part will provide clear examples of how you have enhanced your skills. For instance, the application of the three Porter’s (1987) essential tests (see Activity 19.7) could have enhanced your ability to compare diversification choices and select the most suitable. Your answer should conclude by showing how this learning has progressed your understanding of strategic management as a discipline.
Other (Not Listed) Sample Content Preview:
Whitbread’s Corporate and Business Strategies Student Name University Course Professor Name Date Whitbread’s Corporate and Business Strategies Part 1: The Company’s Current Corporate Strategy Whitbread’s growth and success have resulted from the company’s various strategic choices over the years. The strategic choices have revolved around three main aspects of corporate strategy: product diversification, internationalisation, and vertical integration. Product diversification is manifested through the different products and services the businesses offer. Through acquisitions and mergers, Whitbread has provided various products and services, including food, accommodation, and beverages. This provision is reflected throughout the company’s history. For instance, Whitbread Samuel Whitbread built the first purpose-built mass-production brewery in the UK in 1750 (Whitbread, 2022d). In 1968, Whitbread started brewing Heineken under license. The company opened the first Beefeater in 4974 and the first Travel Inn in 1987. The 1990s was a period of acquisitions, in which the company purchased Marriot Hotels, David Lloyd Leisure, Pizza Hut, TGI Fridays, and Premier Lodge Hotels (Whitbread, 2022d). Whitbread also sold Costa to Coca Cola and made a partnership that was deemed highly attractive for British business (Financial Times, 2018). Even though some of these purchases were sold in the early2000s, the company remained highly diversified in terms of the products and services offered to clients. Product diversification is also apparent across the markets served by Whitbread. However, it can be observed that after selling many acquisitions, Whitbread currently concentrates on hotels offering accommodation, food, and beverages to travellers. Premier Inn is the company’s major brand and is associated with high occupancy levels despite the relatively low share of supply. Most rooms are sold to domestic travellers because they have a higher frequency of visits and a greater likelihood of staying beyond business meetings. The company has over 30 operational hotels in Germany and an open and committed pipeline comprising over 72 hotels. The main reasons the company chose product diversification were the opportunities for growth and lucrative market gaps. For example, the main reason for brewing Heineken under license in 1968 was that the company observed a growing thirst for lager in the UK in the 1960s (Whitbread, 2022d). Each acquisition was an opportunity for growth and financial prosperity. Additionally, the company sought to capitalise on its resources and capabilities. As a strong brand, especially in the UK, Whitbread was assured of replicating similar successes with other brands it purchased. The greatest advantage of product diversification was immense financial gains. However, the main detriment was that the resources were stretched, and there was a possibility that a poor-performing brand might affect the reputation of other brands. Another aspect of corporate strategy based on which Whitbread has made strategic choices is internationalisation. It is important to express that internationalisation and globalisation are often used differently. Internationalisation entails efforts to work across national borders, while globalisation entails how internationalisation increases global interconnectedness. Whitbread does not necessarily engage in globalisation because the focus is majorly on attracting international clients. Therefore, the company is keen to ensure the brand is recognised globally to attract clients to its facilities in the UK and Germany (Whitbread, 2022c). However, the fact that Whitbread has physical locations and facilities in the UK and Germany means that, to some extent, the company has pursued globalisation. Regarding internationalisation, one of the strategic choices the company has made over the years is the choice of location. Businesses must determine where to locate when they decide to expand into new nations. Germany is a country that receives heavy international travel traffic, making major cities an ideal location for Whitbread to locate hotels. Similar to the UK, the German market also attracts domestic travel. However, how much market share domestic travellers command still needs to be determined. Therefore, Whitbread’s Premier Inn can only build enough facilities to ensure commercial feasibility. The main feature of the German market is that it is significantly more fragmented and regionally dispersed. The fragmentation means that most hotels are independent, making up about 72% of the supply. It is also more domestic travel-oriented, which attracts more domestic travellers. Regional dispersion drives demand for short-stay travel. The main advantage of internationalisation is that it allows the company to have an international brand presence, which helps with brand marketing. Additionally, it can also exploit international markets for revenue growth. The main disadvantage is that as a hotel business, building hotels and related infrastructure can be expensive. Different rules and regulations, tax policies and systems, and other national differences may make competing with the host country’s well-established businesses difficult. Whitbread has also made some strategic choices based on the vertical integration aspect of corporate strategy. Whitbread’s strategic choice was full integration, which implies the scenario where a company has full ownership and control of the entire value system underlying its products and services. Whitbread boasts of operating a vertically integrated model where it owns all of the value chain. In this case, the value chain has a wide spectrum ranging from developing and constructing hotels to managing the brand, operations, and direct distribution. The main reason Whitbread chose full vertical integration was the desire to achieve structural growth and create value for the shareholders in the longer term. The mergers and acquisitions in the UK and Germany were all designed to ensure that Whitbread was in charge of the entire value chain. It means owning all the hotels and other facilities, including those in the pipeline. Whitbread does not engage in partnerships or mergers that delegate control to other firms. The main advantage of this strategic choice is that it allows centralised control, which helps align the entire value chain with the corporate strategy. The main drawback is the resource commitment required to sustain such control. Additionally, such commitment means reduced focus on the core business and costlier operations compared to when some operations are outsourced to cheaper third parties. Part 2: Potential Strategic Choices and Recommendations Based on Whitbread’s current corporate strategies and strategic choices, several potential strategic choices that can fuel further growth avail themselves. The first potential strategic choice falls within the product diversification aspect of the corporate strategy. After the sale of many previous acquisitions, it can be observed that Whitbread’s core businesses revolve around accommodation. Therefore, the company should seek further diversification based on current economic and sector trends. In this case, the recommended strategic choice is venturing into the sharing economy due to its growth potential and ability to steam a massive market share from traditional hotels. The main idea of a sharing economy is that people create a community in which they interact, rent, lend, and exchange goods and services (Lho et al., 2022). Like the broader economy comprising business-to-business and business-to-customer interactions, the sharing economy can also take various forms, such as business-to-business, peer-to-peer, business-to-peer, and crowd. Such arrangements are worth considering for a business in the hotel industry. The main reason for adopting the best practices in the sharing economy is that the sharing economy continues and is expected to continue registering phenomenal growth as more businesses emerge from this model. In the hotel business, the sharing economy has seen the rise of Airbnb, considered the...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Sign In
Not register? Register Now!