Analysis of document. China vs The USA. History Essay

China vs The USA
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Analysis of Document I
The document, famously known as the “Integrated Bus Suggestions” was drafted by the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr, Powell, William J and other organizers of The Montgomery Improvement Association on December 19, 1956, following the Supreme Court ruling, which declared the bus segregation was unconstitutional. The leaders of the movement penned down the list of guidelines to guide their followers on the recommended behaviors to avoid raising tension or over-excitement on the newly integrated buses. The document depicts some elements of biases in spite of its authenticity and logic. Particularly, the bias is evident in some of the specific proposed suggestions. For instance, “Do not deliberately sit by a white person, unless there is no other seat,” clues that the authors’ prejudice as they are ironically against the primary objective of the movement which was to replace segregation with unity. However, the bias is understandable since it came from the group that viewed themselves as less equal and needed to humble for the sake of peace, love, and unity.
The source was drafted to primarily direct the group of blacks in Montgomery and Alabama on how to behave in the integrated buses after the end of the infamous bus boycott. Apart from issues directives, the source also served as a tool that campaigned for peace among blacks despite any the possible provocation from the white supremacist.The source offers suggestions rather than arguments. The suggestion is coined into consideration of harsh and unfair treatment the black community had been going through. Throughout the list, the black community is persuaded and encouraged to use nonviolent acts. “If cursed, do not curse back. If pushed, do not push back. If struck, do not strike back, but witness love and goodwill at all time.” The drafters of the document are essentially urging their followers to demonstrate humility and perseverance to overcome the ongoing oppression. The suggestions are written in a conciliatory, and obsequious tones. From the tones, authors’ intentions were to placate and soothe their followers from showcasing vengeance as well as advising them to be submissive and humble to prevent confrontations and violence.
The suggestions were structured to develop a foundation of love. Martin Luther King, Jr always believed in the nonviolent method of human interaction that is against retaliation, revenge, and aggression. The document begins by putting a smile on the face of the concerned members as it was a day to celebrate the end of the unpleasant apathetic treatment from many white people. The idea that blacks will be re-boarding the integrated buses offered a sign of relief from the unending discrimination. Subsequently, the introduction advice and warns the black community to celebrate the good news with moderation there could be a possible limitation ahead of the implementation of the Supreme Court ruling. Furthermore, the authors urge their supporters to read, study and memorize the proposed suggestions for their benefits and convenience. The entire introduction of the source paints the Martin Luther King, Jr and his team as good writers who were able to pass exciting messages with cautiousness and reasonableness to prevent creating opportunities to their adversaries that could jeopardize their main course in the movement. Readers got the feeling of concern and enthusiasm from their leaders as they read through the document.
The authors chose to use the proper mode of language as the communication was official. Notably, the authors intentionally used religious language to instill the element of hope and believe in their targeted readers. “…but pray for the oppressor and use moral and spiritual force to carry on the struggle for justice.” Using religious scripts in the writing invokes the feeling of encouragement, hope, and determination during a challenging movement in human life. Spiritual words are known to impart calmness and dignity even under extreme provocations. The readers are left with the feeling that the court ruling marked the beginning of a society that fosters equality and justice.
Throughout the document, the leaders appear to be pleading with their supporters rather than inciting, “Not all white people are opposed to integrated buses. Accept goodwill on the part of man.” The line debunks the myth blacks also treated the white with prejudice and discrimination when they go the chance. Luther King, Jr, and other leaders were fully aware the idea of the integrated buses was not going to go down well with some of the blacks who still held slight vengeance against the oppressors. For this reason, the leaders strived to convince its members to forgive and embrace the white people as not all of them were in support of bus segregation. Furthermore, the less convinced were given the alternative option of walking until they gained the confidence to welcome the idea. Generally, has not many biases since the others were focusing mostly on bringing reconciliation between the two antagonistic parties where the blacks were suffering the most.
Historically, the source is important because it not only offered appropriate tactics to end discrimination of the African American community, but it also serves as a proof that the blacks believed in moderation and peace even when they were served with hostility. In addition, the source revealed Martin Luther King, Jr, as the chief ambassador of peace and staunch Christianity who led the African American movements with dignity during the reconstruction period. The source demonstrated that nonviolence is the creation psalms of brotherhood and social transformation both in the past and today.
Analysis of Document II
The source is a speech written and read by Mississippi Governor Ross Barnet to his Constituency in 1962, following his defiance to the Supreme Court’s order to admit James Meredith, a black student at the University of Mississippi. Governor Barnet felt that the federal government under the administration of President John F. Kennedy was meddling with the matters that were exclusively deemed as state affairs. As a result, Governor Barnet used the speech to incite the residents of Mississippi to support his zealous stand against the idea of school integration. The governor took the advantage of the riots and violence against the idea of integrated schools at the Ole Miss Campus to deliver the speech. The speech is regarded as one of most racist speeches in the history of Mississippi. The incident turned out ugly as two people died and more than 3000 succumbed to injuries when President J, F. Kennedy sent federal troops to get James Meredith to class. The source can be categorized as biased since it represents an individual’s opinions and principles, which he presumes that are shared and supported by all Mississippians.
The source is purely a slating and an inciting speech that criticizes and rubbishes the federal governments’ idea of introducing integrated schools and its interventions in state matters. In addition, the source was meant to provoke the feelings of the locals to gain considerate support. The author argued that the constitution grants the states and the common citizens the powers that are not delegated to the United States. In other words, the governor opens the speech by invoking the constitution to sway and convince the impartial Mississippians who might be reluctant to join the resisting group. Mississippians are meant to believe that the USA constitution grants them an outright mandate to enforce things in their favor in the event the federal government fails or subvert their interest. In the speech, the governors incite his followers to hate institutions that are against their stand. He achieves this by claiming that the federal government is using judicial oppressions, unfriendly liberal press, federal troops, professional agitators and propagandists to intimidate, and physically force the Mississippians to submit to the proposed ideas of integrated schools.
The arguments in the source are wittily structured to evoke listeners’ emotions and capture their attention as well. The speaker achieves this by using disapproving, persuasive and egoistical tones throughout the document. The speech begins with a disapproving tone where the speaker portrays constant critics and condemnations to John F. Kennedy’s administration. “The Kennedy Administration is lending the power of the federal government to the ruthless demands of these agitators.” The speaker claims that the USA government was supporting the proponents of the integrated school's proposal, a group he referred to as the un-American pressure groups, at the expense of its own people. The speaker later switches to a persuasive tone to impart his influence and convince the listeners to support his quest. The argument is that the opposing the suggested idea would be the right thing to do since it is about defending and preserve the constitution that was fought for by their forefathers. Towards the end of the speech, the speaker adopts an egoistical tone where he boasts with conceit as a way of making the supporters to grow confidence in him. “…no school in our state will be integrated while I am your Governor.” This is a proud statement that the speaker uses to boost his self-image and impart authority within his territory.
As aforementioned, the speaker constructed his arguments through majorly through incitement. The intention was to instill worry and hatred in his audience to earn indisputable support. Worry and detestation are developed through the imagery and skillful choice of words. “Even now as I speak to you tonight, professional agitators, the unfriendly liberal press and other troublemakers are pouring across our borders intent…” The imagination of the statement invokes resentment in listeners, hence convincing them to believe the speakers have a point of concern. In addition, Governor Barnet is a good speaker because he intentionally referred to the African Americans as “un-Americans” to evoke a feeling of hatred towards the blacks’ community who are viewed as immigrants, a strategy that would benefit his opposing group. The speaker’s words are relatable because they typically resonate with what other racists Americans would say or support in the past and even today. The imagery employed majorly used heighten the severity of the problem to sway the audience into believing that it was time to retaliate.
The speech a vital historical significance since it showcases the efforts put by President Kennedy in fighting against inequality and other forms of discrimination towards the African Americans. Also, the source is a valuable historical piece as it offers insights of struggles and discrimination that the blacks went through in the past. Today, African Americans have equal rights and freedom of education as they can be admitted to any university without any kind of discernment. With Governor Barnet, the source exposes the extent of racism that was being perpetrated by the senior government official.
Analysis of Document III
The source “How to be the Perfect Wife,” is a controv...