100% (1)
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
-1
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 17.28
Topic:

Abolishing the Death Sentence on Grounds That it is Racist

Essay Instructions:

You have a range of topics to choose from, and you are welcome to select your own as well. Your paper should be thesis driven. Your thesis claim should clearly answer a question by making a distinct claim, and use sources and concepts from the course (and, if needed, independent research) as well as argumentation to justify your answer to the question. You can select a topic area and develop a thesis claim on your own, or you can choose a research question from the below list and develop a thesis that answers that question. Your draft should at least include an introductory paragraph, a thesis claim, a works cited page and a rough outline.



Potential Final Paper Questions:

1. On whether or not to reopen schools in a global pandemic: UConn is planning to

continue facilitating a primarily online mode of instruction for the foreseeable

future, at least through Spring semester. What considerations led them to make this

choice? Ethically, do you think it is the right choice? If you think it is, do these same

reasons extend to primary education as well, or are different considerations

needed? Why? At what point do you think it would be ethically appropriate for

UConn to return to an in-person mode of instruction?

2. On the federally guaranteed right to access abortion procedures: The Roe v. Wade

ruling in 1973 secured a constitutional right for pregnant women to choose whether

or not to terminate their pregnancy pre-viability. Further regulations on abortion

procedures are left up to the states, but undue interference in this decision during

this timeframe are not consistent with the Roe v. Wade ruling. If Roe v. Wade were

overturned or adjusted, many states may outlaw or restrict abortion much more

than they already do. Proponents of the ruling insist that this is a matter of women’s

rights to reproductive autonomy, and overturning the ruling would be unjust.

Opponents hold that this is a matter of the unborn fetus’ right to life, so allowing

abortion can be unjust. Take a stand. Should the right to an abortion be federally

protected, and to what extent? Why?

3. On abolishing the death penalty on the grounds that it is racist: Racism weighs heavy

on the collective consciousness of most Americans in the current political climate.

There are many possible paper topics in this arena, but this prompt specifically

focuses on the argument in Cholbi and Madva’s paper “Black Lives Matter and the

Call for Death Penalty Abolition.” Explain their argument that US capital punishment

practices represent a wrong specifically to black communities, and their call for

death penalty abolition based on this claim. Do you agree with their argument? Why

or why not? If you agree, do you also think this argument extends to other practices,

and if so, what? If you disagree, with what (do you disagree that the criminal justice

system is a racist institution? do you disagree that the death penalty should be

abolished because of this?) and why, and what ways forward would you suggest?





These are just three ideas of how you can extend content from our course to answer

specific, targeted questions. There are many more ideas, and I want to give you the freedom

to write a paper on something you find interesting. Contact me if you have a topic you are

interested in writing a paper on and I can help suggest philosophical articles that could

guide you.







Your paper should:

➢ Respond to the prompt

➢ Define all terms and clearly explicate all theoretical language

→ Write for an audience that knows nothing about the content

➢ Have a clear and logical structure

→ Contain an introduction with a clear roadmap for the paper, culminating in a

targeted thesis claim

→ Smoothly transition between topics

→ Tie things back together in a brief conclusion

➢ Defend your position with reasons

→ Appropriately interpose your own writers voice/ voice of reason (say what

you think) with the voices of philosophers we discussed or that you

researched independently

➢ Accurately represents relevant course concepts/content

➢ Contain appropriate formatting

→ 12 pt, Times New Roman font, double spaced, no added spaces between

paragraphs, 1” margins

→ Prose/grammar

→ Works Cited Page in MLA or APA format







A summary of course content:

If you would like to create your own prompt, here is a summary of the course content thus

far that you could use to guide your creation of a thesis claim.

➢ Metaethics

→ What is moral subjectivism/relativism? Is morality subjective/relative? Why

or why not?

→ What is divine command theory of ethics? What is the “Euthyphro” problem

for such a theory? What further question does this dilemma pose? How do

particular ethical theories aim to answer this question?

→ What is the “why be moral” question? What is the difference between

instrumental and intrinsic value? Why (if we should) should we expect to

have reason to value moral behavior intrinsically? How do particular ethical

theories respond to this question?

➢ Ethical Theory

→ What is Utilitarianism? What is the principle of utility? What is the difference

between Bentham’s and Mill’s versions of “happiness”? Do you think there

are higher and lower pleasures? What are the four objections to

utilitarianism? Do you think they succeed?

→ What is Kantianism? What is a good will? What is the Categorical Imperative?

Why should we be motivated to act according to the Categorical Imperative?

Why does it provide exceptionless moral rules? Do you agree with the

Kantian Moral theory? Why or why not?

→ What is Aristotelian virtue theory? What is a “chief good,” and why does

Aristotle think there must be one single one for a human life? Do you agree?

What kind of thing is it (Eudaimonia) for humans? What is Aristotle’s picture

of a good life? Do you agree? Why or why not? How do we develop the

virtues? What is the doctrine of the golden mean? How can this guide us in

hard cases?

→ What is care ethics as a moral theory? What does it mean that the theory is

particularist rather than principle-based, and why? Do you agree? What does

it mean to “care”? Should we think about care ethics as a version of virtue

theory? Why or why not? Why should we care about caring? How do we

improve our ability to care?

➢ Pandemic ethics

→ What are the most pressing issues related to the pandemic? How should

individuals and governments respond to threats to public safety? What moral

imperatives does a global pandemic bring about? How can different

theoretical frameworks help us determine the nature and scope of our moral

obligations in these unprecedented times? Should schools return to

in-person? Should businesses open up? Should mask-wearing be mandated

everywhere? Should vaccine trials be expedited? When a vaccine is

developed and approved, how should it be administered? Should it be free?

Should it be required?

➢ Race and Racism

→ What is racism? What are the different types of racism? How do we apply

these definitions to individual persons, actions, institutions? Can you be

racist without knowing it? Is all race-based discrimination racist? What is

distinct about racism, according to the theorists we discussed? What are the

implications of this? Do you agree?

→ What are the effects of individual-level and institutional-level racism on our

nation’s practices today? What do we do about it?

→ What do Cholbi and Madva argue? Do you agree with them?

➢ Abortion

→ How do we ask and answer questions about the moral permissibility of

abortion? What do these questions and answers depend on? Is a fetus an

individual human being with separate moral rights, or are they a biological

part of their mother? Is abortion morally permissible? Should a woman’s

right to an abortion be legally protected? To what extent? How (if at all) are

these separate questions connected?

➢ Animal Ethics

→ Do nonhuman animals have moral rights? What is the nature of these rights?

Is factory farming unethical? Is there a “humane” way to raise an animal for

slaughter? Is animal product consumption unethical regardless of origin? Is

the practice of animal domestication and pet-ownership unethical? If so,

why? Is it because these practices harm animals? Or, do you think animals

have rights over and above rights not to be harmed (as we tend to think that

humans do)?









!!!!! View Attached File if Still NOT Clear !!!!!!!! THX!

Essay Sample Content Preview:
Student's Name
Course Name & Number
Professor's Name
Paper due date
Abolishing the Death Sentence on Grounds That it is Racist
Research Outline
* Background
* Thesis claim
* Explanation based on the thesis claim supported by academic literature
* Summary of the main points of the essay and restatement of the thesis in new wording.
* Make a final statement that is memorable.
In the last two decades, the skin color of a defendant has played a crucial but quite unfortunately unacceptable role in deciding who receives the death penalty in America. America's executions and death sentences reached their highs, and capital punishment seemed to have been entrenched as part of the criminal justice system. The discriminatory patterns were in targeted racial bias with perceptions of Black people as criminals (Cholbi et al., pg. 533). Death penalty is not only unacceptable as a whole, there is need for sensitization of the unforgivable injustices that black Americans have been dealt based solely on skin colour.
The federal government and bout thirty-eight states had capital acts on the records, and the political actors at all levels appeared steadfast in fast-tracking executions. Racial bias ranks high in these executions and death sentences, and several Africans have been affected by this vice. African-Americans constitute 12% of the US population, but they make up 40% of the death row population. There are so many more blacks in American prisons than whites, which cannot be attributed to blacks' high crime rate but because of racial discrimination in the criminal justice system (Hood et al., pg. 15). The Black Lives Matter Movement has advocated for abolishing capital punishment in what they term as "the war against Black people" and "Black communities."
I concur with the statement thatUS Capital punishment practices represent a wrong, especially for black people. In many cases the punishment did not match the wrong and at times no thorough investigation would be done. Additionally, it did not quite serve justice to have an all-white jury deciding a black case. This in itself would not be a problem if racism was not an issue but often, this only served to stress white supremacy and impose death penalties just because ‘they could’ That said, capital punishments and death sentence should not be abolished based on racial grounds only. There are a lot of white people who have gone through it too. It is therefore, important to mention that death sentence does not serve an obvious purpose of oppressing black communities. Racial discrimination has persisted, although it has taken more implied, refined, and more harmful forms.
Ironically, with all the human right advocacy and crusades, as of June 2020, the death penalty is still legal in 28 US states. The death penalty is imposed when an individual commits treason, espionage, large-scale drug trafficking, and murder or attempted murder of a witness, court officer, or juror. It is significant to examine the racist institutions of a death sentence because execution ultimately expresses which group of people is valued by the society and which groups are considered dispensable (Neumayer 252). US expressions in its executions show some racist tones, especially when we examine a person's race being charged. However, it takes clear racial discrimination direction when we look at the race of original murder victims.
There is more going on and not just the black communities' crime rate; hence it is essential to focus on violence suffered and committed by blacks in slums. Federal and state officials use this to just high numbers of death penalty cases among blacks. Therefore, these racist decisions supported by the government sets a stage for racial discrimination in the criminal justice system. William Julius Wilson refers to this situation as social dislocation and explains that it is not something that black Americans chose for themselves.
Criminal acts among the black communities are attributed to insufficient mainstream roles tied to frustration due to unemployment an...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Sign In
Not register? Register Now!