100% (1)
page:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
3
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 18
Topic:

Policy Memo

Essay Instructions:
FINAL MEMO INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS Page Maximum The Final Memo will consist of 5 pages of text double-spaced, 12-point, Times New Roman). The memo will be on a current, or recent, policy issue of your choosing. If you have any graphics or tables they can be included within the five-pages (but don't go crazy). You must include a Works Cited section on a 6th page. The works cited is NOT part of the five pages. Required Memo Contents The memo must contain 5 sections, with the headings indicated below, which you will write and provide in the following order [do NOT number them because that looks less professional]. However, you MUST keep the headings in the document. 1. Nature of the Issue/Problem Here, you describe the problem or issue with which your Final Memo addresses. You should mention here that it has been grabbing media attention or governmental attention or has been triggered by some event – whatever the case may be for your issue/problem. You are making the case that your policy problem is something that policy makers should address as soon as possible. 2. History of the Issue/Problem. This will include past legislation or past programs that have been implemented by the governmental levels you are researching [national, state, local – or all three, depending on how your frame of reference. Remember that we live in a federalist system. Decide in section two if you want to focus on federal or state law. If you want to focus on federal law, look at past federal actions. If you want to look specifically at policy action in one state, that is fine. You can do so in this section. If you are focusing on state policy, make sure that your recommendations are state policy recommendations. In our current federalist system there are often state and federal laws that seek to solve the same policy problem. You can mention both state and federal law, just know that this may include A LOT of different legislative actions. 3. Where Things Stand Now in Addressing the Issue/Problem Here, you will discuss what is working and what is not working or not being addressed per current policies or programs. 4. Possible Policy Alternatives. These will likely be a mix of alternatives that have already been suggested or proposed by members of that policy community and your own carefully considered policy alternatives. You must briefly touch on some pros and cons. You must assert a position on each policy alternative. Do you think it is a good or bad option. Remember this memo is intended to convince lawmakers and the public to take a certain policy action. 5. Recommendations. These are your recommendations based on your research and consideration of the alternatives you discussed and what you believe is feasible from a political, technical, and/or financial standpoint. This section is very important and should be specific. Make a REAL policy recommendation. Don't just say, "we should stop climate change." Say, "climate change is a crisis and therefore we need to take swift policy action by implementing X policy that will cost X dollars and achieve X goal." This should be a REAL recommendation. Pretend that your recommendation is a policy that you want to drag through the policy cycle to adoption. You better know what you are talking about! Sound convincing enough to convince someone else! That is the whole point. Citations In Text and Works Cited - How to do the In-Text Citations and the Works Cited Page? You must provide both in-text citations and a works cited section. In-text citations are required for quotes and any data or knowledge from another source or data that is not commonly known. Here are examples of how to do in-text citations. Yada yada yada yada 56% of smokers yada (Kingdon, 34). “Yada yada yada yada,” (Epstein, 135). Note: Keep quotes to no more than 15 words – no long quotes. Here is an example of a how to provide a source for the Works Cited page if you use APA citation format. You may use APA, MLA, or Chicago Style, etc. format for in-text and works cited citations. Just make sure that you follow the rules and that you are consistent. Purdue OWLLinks to an external site. is a good website [from Purdue University] that explains in clear detail how to do citations in the different formats. Kingdon, J. W. (2011). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, updated second edition. New York: Longman. Do NOT use Wikipedia as a source and do not cite it or include it in your Works Cited.
Essay Sample Content Preview:
To From Subject: Policy on Housing Affordability and Supply Shortage The U.S. currently has a severe and prolonged crisis of housing affordability. The crisis has advanced to policy challenge status and is now foundationally threatening to macroeconomic stability and nationwide social equality (Sümer, 109). The housing issue, caused by decades of underbuilding, restrictive local land-use regulation, and high land, labor, and material costs, is receiving unprecedented attention from governments and media. For years now, wage growth has consistently lagged behind median home prices and rents. Costs have gone up a lot when people have to spend more than thirty percent of their income on shelter only. The basic stability of the American home and the national economy's long-term health are at risk, requiring immediate and comprehensive policy intervention. History of the Problem In the 1930s and 1960s modern American housing policy began to take shape as a result of the new deal and post-war periods. The 1937 creation of the Public Works Administration (PWA) and the PWA’s Public Housing program was aimed at directly building housing for the neediest (Sümer, 137). At the same time, creating the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and Fannie Mae subsidized and insured mortgages, making it possible for the middle class to own homes. From the 1970s and 1980s, the focus of policy changed. Federal government steered away from building homes toward helping owners (Sümer, 136). In the year 1974, the Housing and Community Development Act established a new program, the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program. The program provided payments to landlords, as per the local market rent, and not for the new units. This cut down the overall supply of publicly subsidized housing and enhanced competition for affordable private units available. The 1986 Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program was created. It is now the main federal vehicle for financing new affordable rental housing production and it encourages private investment of the tax credit. Current Status Programs and policies in place currently provide important safety nets and create some affordable housing, but do not conclusively address the systemic shortage and overall crisis. Despite the problems, LIHTC continues to be essential, financing billions in private capital towards the funding of the construction of hundreds of thousands of new affordable rental units over the years (Bipartisan Policy Center, 1). Also, rent subsidies offered by the Housing Choice Voucher Program remain an important resource for millions of poor families and keep them out of possible homelessness. It is encouraging that some states, such as California, Oregon, and Washington, have accepted that local hyper-local control has failed and are now passing state legislation that requires Accessory Dwelling Units be legalized and single-family zoning eliminated near transit corridors to preempt restrictive local zoning. Addressing the supply root of this problem, these actions constitute a critical, necessary step. But, the size of the failure is overwhelming the core policies themselves. There are millions of units under-supplied in the U.S. that cannot be constructed because of federal programs Centre’s which mostly focus on demand-side subsidy or niche production (LIHTC). Restrictive zoning represents the main impediment (Bipartisan Policy Center, 1). Restrictions on minimum lot sizes, height restrictions and costly parking requirements raise the costs of building and make it illegal to add the density needed to meet growth. A local policy paralysis materially constrains the market from building the housing stock at any price. Additionally, the funding gap is enormous for even deeply subsidized housing (Sümer, 109). That is because the complicated LIHTC system rarely provides the total cost of construction and substantial, often elusive local or state gap financing. Possible Policy Alternative...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Sign In
Not register? Register Now!