100% (1)
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
1
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 7.2
Topic:

Leadership, Governance, and Collaboration in the Film Twelve Angry Men

Essay Instructions:

Please refer to the 12 Angry Men movie or book, you can find summary of it online. It is pretty short. Or if you know the 12 angry men already that is great.

The paper must incorporate one of the course concepts (theories) from week 7-12 and explored in detail using terminology from the slides.

Essay Sample Content Preview:
Student Name
Instructor’s Name
Course Section
Date
Title
The film “Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose scrutinizes twelve jurors who are brought together to deliberate on a murder trial case. A nineteen-year-old man is on trial for murdering his father; besides that, this man has a prior criminal record. If the man is found guilty, the man will be executed. Before any formal discussion, the jury deliberated and voted. Surprisingly, eleven jurors vote “guilty,” while only one, Juror number eight, votes “not guilty.” Juror number eight stands out because he is the protagonist of the film. Moreover, the jurors’ personalities and attitudes emerge as they deliberate and debate. The film teaches many important lessons about leadership, governing, and collaboration. It also tells the people not to succumb to popular opinion. Almost every aspect of group communication is depicted in the film, from the conflicts up to the rewarding success of an effective leader (Twelve Angry Men)
Throughout the film, juror number eight has used interpersonal influence tactics. To illustrate, the juror has established his credibility by being truthful and upfront in his interactions and dealings with others. The juror is very truthful and honest about his views in the film. He is the only one with a different vote, but he remains firm on his decision. He frequently expresses his reservations about allowing the young man to die without proper discussion. When the other jurors attempt to persuade him that he is incorrect, he empathizes and accepts their position, but he openly reveals his view again. Unlike the other jurors, he av...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Sign In
Not register? Register Now!