Week 1 Exercise

Mrs. Doubtfire divorce argumentLinks to an external site. After watching the video clip, please respond to the following: In approximately 1-2 pages, consider the following elements and how they impact this conflict. Make sure to reference the resource materials used to respond to this prompt with APA-compliant in-text citations and references. (1) Start with a brief description of the conflict (limit this to one sentence). Tell the reader whether this conflict is interpersonal or intrapersonal. THEN: (2) Then, analyze the conflict in terms of the following categories, providing details to describe how each element affects the subject conflict. Your discussion of these elements should include references to the textbook, as it is the primary resource for this assignment. You also have a number of other resources you may use to respond to these questions; however, remember that your goal is to demonstrate you learned the material and can correctly apply it in a practical way. Consider the history of this conflict, to which the parties make reference throughout this argument, and how it impacts the conflict we are watching today. Make sure to apply these considerations to BOTH parties in the conflict. Elements: Communication Emotion Values Structural Forces The needs of the parties Survival Needs Interest Needs Identity Needs Considering what you learned from the materials this week, and your observations about conflict styles and the power dynamics of this conflict, what could the parties do to better address this conflict? It is important that you address every element above. NOTE: When you watch this week's mini-lecture video, I refer to a "worksheet" for this assignment. This is because the assignment was originally presented as a worksheet. However, during recent updates, the content was embedded above, rather than supplied as an attachment. The references to a worksheet relate to the above questions. Resources: Textbook The Dynamics of Conflict - Chapter 1 The Dynamics of Conflict - Chapter 2 Articles: Power in Interpersonal Conflict explains the dynamic of power in conflict. Conflict Competency: What Does it Take?Links to an external site. briefly outlines foundations and reactions in conflict. Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Conflict Links to an external site.outlines the foundations of interpersonal vs. intrapersonal conflict. What is the Difference Between Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Conflict?Links to an external site. outlines the foundations of interpersonal vs. intrapersonal conflict. Structural InequalitiesLinks to an external site. explains the role of structural (social) inequalities in interpersonal conflict. Conflict StylesLinks to an external site. Power_In_Interpersonal_Conflict.pptDownload Power_In_Interpersonal_Conflict.ppt The Five Conflict StylesLinks to an external site. Rubric Journal Rubric (PSY/ORG) Journal Rubric (PSY/ORG) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent & Analysis 45 pts EXEMPLARY Offers a lucid and logical argument or observation (dependent upon assignment). Points are supported by unit materials, learnings and resources. The content of the work is well developed and the ideas are explained and accurate. ALL elements of the instructions are addressed. 41 pts GOOD Argument or observations are present, but are not fully developed. Ideas are explained and accurate. ALL elements of the instructions are addressed. 37 pts SATISFACTORY Argument or observations are attempted, but lack clarity and/or ideas are not developed and explained. ALL elements of the instructions are addressed. 33 pts MARGINAL Summary and description are present, but analysis and logical argument or observations are not. Not all elements of the instructions were addressed. 28 pts UNSATISFACTORY No logical argument or observations present. Not all elements of the instructions were addressed. 45 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Evidence 35 pts Used and clearly identified sources from the unit materials or independent research that effectively supported and enhanced ideas. Sources are clearly cited in-text and in a properly APA-formatted resource page. 32 pts Used and clearly identified sources and some/ most sources used clearly enhanced and supported ideas. Sources are cited in-text and in a properly APA-formatted resource page. 29 pts Ideas and conclusions are in line with the week’s learning materials and resources, and resources are incorrectly cited (e.g. no in-text citation and improperly formatted resource page) 26 pts Ideas and conclusions are partially supported by the week’s learning materials and resources, and resources are incorrectly cited (e.g. no in-text citation and improperly formatted resource page) 22 pts Ideas and conclusions are not in line with the week’s learning materials and resources. No sources were used or the ones used do not support/enhance ideas. 35 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Structure 5 pts Organization is sequential and appropriate. Paragraphs are well developed and divided. Ideas are linked and smooth transitions are present. 4.5 pts Organization is competent. Paragraphs are appropriately used, but some transitions are not smooth. 4 pts Organization is attempted but is not sequential and/or appropriate. Paragraphs are used, but some are not appropriate and/or transitions are not smooth. 3.5 pts Organization, if evident at all, is weak and disjointed. Paragraphs, if used, are weak and transitions are lacking. 3 pts No organization and structure present. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics & Style 10 pts Virtually free of punctuation, spelling, and capitalization errors. 9 pts Occasional (1-2) independent punctuation, spelling, and capitalization errors. 8 pts Several (3-5) independent punctuation, spelling, and capitalization errors. 7 pts Numerous (6-8) independent punctuation, spelling, and capitalization errors. 6 pts An overabundance (9+) of independent punctuation, spelling, and capitalization errors. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar 5 pts Sentences are structured effectively and vary in length and style. 4.5 pts Most sentences are structure effectively and vary in length and style. Occasional (1-2 sentences) contain independent structural deficiencies. For example, simple sentences, run-ons, and poor sentence flow. 4 pts Sentences contain several (3-5 sentences) independent structural deficiencies. For example, simple sentences, run-ons, and poor sentence flow. 3.5 pts Sentences contain numerous (6-8) independent structural deficiencies. For example, simple sentences, run-ons, and poor sentence flow. 3 pts Sentence structure throughout paper made it difficult and/or impossible to read. There were an overabundance (9 or more sentences) of independent structural deficiencies. For example, simple sentences, run-ons, and poor sentence flow. 5 pts Total Points: 100 link https://www(dot)youtube(dot)com/watch?v=yKiAJWc2ouU articles https://wilmu(dot)instructure(dot)com/courses/66762/files/10756144/preview https://www(dot)ccl(dot)org/multimedia/podcast/conflict-competency-what-does-it-take/ https://open(dot)lib(dot)umn(dot)edu/organizationalbehavior/chapter/10-2-understanding-conflict/ https://open(dot)lib(dot)umn(dot)edu/organizationalbehavior/chapter/10-2-understanding-conflict/ http://www(dot)beyondintractability(dot)org/audiodisplay/kolb-d-1-struc-ineq http://web(dot)mit(dot)edu/collaboration/mainsite/modules/module1/1.11.5.html https://wilmu(dot)instructure(dot)com/courses/66762/files/10756134/download?wrap=1 http://web(dot)mit(dot)edu/collaboration/mainsite/modules/module1/1.11.5.html