Should the US Use Military Force to Protect Freedom Around the World?

Unit 10 Assessment Paper
Student Name
Department, University
Course Code: Course Name
Professor
Date
Unit 10 Assessment Paper
Source A
Greece needs help to become a self-supporting and self-respecting democratic country. On the other hand, Turkey needs assistance to preserve its territorial integrity, an increasingly essential construct in maintaining sustainable peace and order in the Middle East. The United States’ (U.S.) foreign policy is to create a world where all territories can exist without coercion to embrace specific regimes.
The U.S. should get involved in Greece and Turkey to protect their territorial and national integrity. In this way, the U.S. would ensure Greece’s survival and integrity as a democratic state. Greece’s instability would also spill over to its neighboring countries, including Turkey, culminating in a regional disorder and confusion within the Middle East. Accordingly, U.S involvement in Greece and Turkey would ensure the sustainability of democracy globally, mainly by preventing a loss of territorial integrity and independence of these nations. The fall of Turkey and Greece as democratic states would have vast implications for the West and East. Therefore, such involvement would help police the world and thus promote and protect democracy.
Source B
Although Eisenhower recognized the U.S. military establishment as a crucial ingredient in peace-keeping, he did not advocate for its use. He recognized the need to use the military to keep peace within the confines of constitutional rights to preserve democracy and liberties. Increased investment in the military industry could potentially undermine the democratic principles and constitutional rights that guide peaceful coexistence and humanity.
President Eisenhower discouraged the use of military intervention by advocating for a community of mutual respect and trust. This is because unchecked investment in the military industry creates a community of hate and fear and downplays the contribution of the marginalized groups to the sustainable development of the world. Eisenhower discouraged military involvement in other countries by recognizing that its use undermines equality and diversity. The President promoted diplomacy by promoting a society where different countries could negotiate on the same level irrespective of their military, economic, or moral strengths. He advocated for an atmosphere where people could discuss issues based on purpose and intellect while embracing the differences that exist among themselves. In addition, he recognized that military intervention or war could destroy the sustainability of the current and future generations. He discouraged military use by emphasizing the need for people to recognize that freedom comes with greater responsibilities, including supporting a world based on mutual understanding and respect for humanity.
Source C
Potter discusses the conflict between U.S. foreign policy to promote democracy and morality and the realities witnessed in Vietnam, where the country’s military involvement undermined such ideas. Accordingly, Potter argues that U.S. military involvement in other countries in disguise of protecting American freedoms constitutes a significant threat to global peace today.
I think Potter is against U.S. involvement in Vietnam because it undermined Vietnamese sovereign integrity and principles guiding the functioning of sound democracies. Potter argues that it is increasingly absurd for the President to claim that the U.S. is defending its freedom by committing human rights atrocities in Vietnam. He notes that the destruction and repression perpetrated and justified by Americans in the Vietnam War were so enormous that it could only be described as cultural genocide. American involvement in Vietnam destroyed and dismantled the country’s cultural identity, including traditions and customs that drive the Vietnamese very purpose and dignity as a community. According ...