Philosophy Argumentative Paper Only on (Friedrich Nietzsche)

Hi, I must see the outline by March 8th just like the last order. Anyways, from now I will explain how this professional argumentative essay needs to be written down in order to fulfill the best mark from the Proff/T.A ; So in order to write this paper, I'll provide you my lecture notes of ONLY [friedrich nietzsche] [1-2] on PDF and Also I will upload the book and the chapters you need to read before you write the paper. You're Only supposed to do the topic on friedrich nietzsche, Because that's the only book i could upload for you on PDF. so AVOID the other topics about Kant Groundwork. MUST READ THESE CHAPTERS THAT I WILL UPLOADThe Lessons of History Read: Nietzsche, The Genealogy of Morality, first and second treatises- and Value as a Social Phenomenon Read: Nietzsche, The Genealogy of Morality, third treatise. I want the same writer who wrote the other essays {Consolation Of Philosophy and Hobbes : Keeping Covenants} To write this paper. I will also upload the last essay that he/she wrote To see what they have wrote wrong in it. So you can fix it this time. The mark for the last ESSAY I submit is C which was a big improvement from the 1st paper which was D- the 2nd paper was a C- The 3rd Paper is C which is a big improvement Even though , the class average is C+ So you need to definatly follow up with the T.A Reviews and comments on the last essay you wrote { Hobbes- Keeping Covenants} . I want you to read what you have written wrong and not have the same mistake on this paper PLEASE. Use as the citation and needs to cite the paper preferably using the standard Book-chapter-sentence numbering for Friedrich Nietzsche- On the Genealogy of Morality Translated with introduction and Notes by: Maudemarie Clark and Alan J. Swensen . The writer has to only use the same BOOK THAT everyone else is using. So Please don't bring any outside source to cite. Cite the Book that I WILL UPLOAD as PDF Which is [ Friedrich Nietzche -1844-1900- Translated, with Introduction and Notes, by Maudemarie Clark and Alan J. Swensen] So please do the best to not get C or anything, I'm expecting better then that, since you have wrote 3 of them so far and i have told you what to write in the paper and what to not write. Avoid Making the paper to be mysterious, Get Directly to the Question. Avoid giving any outside source. Use the ONLY ONLY book, Be as CONCISE as you can, Briefly explain the case with answers, If you argue something, Then Say why you argue it. NO FLUFF STUFF. Please, This is the 4th paper you writing. Remember the last Comments by the T.A? I told you; Follow that up. Dont write extra or less. Show the premises cover everything. YOU need to READ ALL THE BOOK THAT I UPLOAD ON Friedrich Nietzsche Also Don't forget to upload the Outline by March 8th, So again, I really want you to read the book first then start finding the arguments and specially write counter arguments so it proves that you understood the instructions well. Make sure that you're writing this to another educated person, who is seeking for only the information that has been asked for, therefore no extra HISTORY DRAMA STUFF, don't be broad about anything... ONLY ONLY and DIRECTLY Get in into the argument set up objections and set up counter arguments in regards to the book and the lecture notes that I will provide you. Make sure that you understand the whole chapters-book, there is about 3 treaties to read, so don't just focus in one sort of thing, ANSWER THE question that has asked on the essay topics. You have about 6 topic choices, read the topic choices and choose whatever you are capable to argue about, bring in STRONG STRONG THESIS. Please don't write anything extra on the paper, Be simple and straight forward. Cite anything that you use, for example: "According to critics every human being has to follow rules and norms of the society. " That's right, but cite it, where did you get that from? Also, be cautious on the grammar, This is a CANADIAN University. So for example, Favor is american, but Favour is canadian. Use the canadian version. DEADLINE IS pretty simple, i want this argumentative essay to be done by March 11th until midnight which is 9 days. But i really recommend the writer to give me an outline by March 8th so i can go show it to my T.A and make sure if we are on the right track then come back to you and tell you what you need to cover and what you don't. So please Provide me an Outline/Draft of what your Thesis will be and Your arguments and counter arguments regarding whatever topic you choose out of 2 and then you will have until March 11th to complete the whole essay. Again, i don't need any extra wording to fill up the page, I want you to be as concise as you can, and if you think you can't do this job for me please tell me. expectation level for grading will be really high since i have got a D- And C- and C So far on the other papers are getting a lot better. Let me know what ever you need so i can provide you. ease put time and effort, because it's not a simple one night thing.. this takes days to read the book, days to analyze the arguments, and days to write it.. Goodluck!!! Hey. Hope you're doing ok. and you know this paper is due in less then a week from now. Here i got some tips for you writing the paper; [3] Nietzsche holds that the key event in the evolution of moral concepts is the “slave revolt in morality,” in which ressentiment brought about an inversion of the knightly/aristocratic values. What does he mean? How did this happen? Is he correct? This essay topic deals with Book I of the Genealogy. The prompt is divided into three parts. The first two questions “what does he mean” and “How did this happen” just ask you to explicate Nietzsche's account of the slave revolt. You want to explicate the process by which the slave revolt occured, not the particular series of historical events that constitute the slave revolt. The history just serves as an example of the process - it is not the main point. In the explication you also want to be able to explain how and why Nietzsche is talking about these things in a historical way. “Is he correct” is just the prompt for you to give some analysis. You do not want to talk about the historical veracity of his claims. Instead you want to focus on the reasoning underlying the process he describes and consider whether or not it is any good. My remarks: Key terms to focus on in the essay are the distinciton between good/bad and good/evil- how are they related? What role do these, and other terms (like ressentiment) play in the account? [4] Nietzsche argues that “if one disregards the ascetic ideal” then human lives have no meaning (§28). State and assess his argument. First you have to understand what Nietzsche means by “ascetic ideal” and “meaning”. What is it for a human life to not have meaning (according to Nietzsche)? Explicate his argument for the ascetic ideal being essential to having a meaningful life. The critical analysis portion just asks you to consider whether or not his argument is any good. Can our lives have meaning if we disregard the ascetic ideal? Make sure you are working with Nietzsche's understanding of “meaning” here. This is the message by T.A. So it will help for sure.