Workplace Political Battles: A Personal Experience
For this assignment you will be continuing to write about your own workplace experiences as they relate to power and politics. Think of one of the largest political battles you witnessed or were apart of during your career, and think carefully about how the concepts from the background materials apply to what you experienced.
In preparation for the SLP, make sure you have a thorough grasp of the terminology from the background materials including the main individual and organizational factors that lead to political behavior and the types of political behavior. Once you are comfortable with the terminology and concepts from the background materials, write a 2- to 3-page paper addressing the following issues:
1. Briefly describe a political battle that took place in your workplace. Explain who the main players were and what issues were at stake.
2. What individual and organizational factors led to this political battle? Refer to the background readings in your answer, and in particular pages 877-883 of Robbins (1997).
3. What types of political behaviors did the participants in this political battle exhibit? Be specific and use the types of political behaviors discussed in pages 297-301 of Luthans et al. (2015).
4. Do you think any of the participants behaved unethically during this political battle? Use the ethical framework discussed on pages 896-898 of Robbins (1997) to guide your answer.
Name
Institution
Workplace Political Battles: A Personal Experience
Political battles are a common phenomenon in organizations since organizations provide individuals with power bases. Also, there are scarce resources within organizations, and competition for these resources contributes to political battles. One of the largest political battles I have ever experienced was between a new C.E.O and senior management. The new C.E.O. challenged the status quo after he discovered that nepotism was common within the organization. The senior management sometimes gave jobs to people they knew personally without considering their qualifications for the job. Also, promotions were given based on the senior management’s preferences, and as a result, more suitable candidates were sometimes left out. The senior management felt threatened by the C.E.O. because they thought he would take away their power if nepotism as practice came to an end. The C.E.O., however, wanted to improve the organization’s performance, and he felt that employing qualified individuals was the first step towards achieving this goal.
Several individual and organizational factors contributed to this political battle. On the one hand, the C.E.O., at an individual level, had a high expectation of success. According to Robbins (1997), individuals with a high expectation of success are likely to engage in political behavior. The C.E.O. wanted his tenure in the organization to be successful and was willing to engage in political behavior to advance his agenda. On the other hand, senior management had a high Machiavellian as an individual factor. Individuals with a Machiavellian personality are manipulative and are greedy for power (Robbins, 1997). Most of the senior managers were greedy for power and used it to manipulate others into doing what they wanted. Picking their preferred employees for certain positions allowed them to do so comfort...
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
-
MGT407 S-2 Social Sciences Essay Research Paper Coursework
3 pages/≈825 words | No Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |
-
Effective Servant leadership
1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |
-
MGT 420 D-2. Synopsis. Social Sciences Discussion.
1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |