International Politics Related to Immigration

Paper Outline
Student Full Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Full Title
Instructor Full Name
Due Date
Paper Outline
Introduction:
Immigration is an integral part of world politics since it is inherently political and international. The interests and power of states are influenced by their location in migration systems: the ability of nations to apply diplomacy or pursue state interests is impacted by the extent to which they are migration-receiving, transit states, or migration-sending (Mitchell, 1989). Migration is a central component of state functions and interests in Turkey, Jordan, Lebanon, Italy, and Greece as migration-receiving and transit states. For instance, Jordan and Turkey have managed to use their position in migration systems as migration-receiving states and transit states to negotiate with the European Union for more aid if they are to continue accommodating refugees from Syria. Increased migratory flows across migration-receiving, transit states, and migration-sending states affect diplomatic interactions between nations in the international system and focus on interstate diplomacy (Weiner, 1985).
As a result of the international organization of states, migration is inevitable. Since the state is central to many of these discussions, it is no surprise that many of these topics revolve around state sovereignty. With the result that government activities play a significant influence in shaping and determining international migration, they believe that migrants have agency and autonomy, not merely as a result of state policy or practice but as a result of their ability to influence events. One of the most fundamental issues in world politics is the inability to agree on who has power and how that power is to be perceived. Because of international migration, consideration must also be given to forming cross-border contacts and bilateral and multilateral collaboration. It is known as institutionalization when large international organizations such as the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the International Organization for Migration are founded (IOM). Organizations such as the International Labor Organization (ILO) operate together with the International Labor Organization (ILO) (ILO). Migrant studies exist at the intersection of many academic areas and specialties.
International relations have been influenced by critical work in geography, sociology, anthropology, political and social theory, economics, and cultural studies, among other subjects. Global governance, international migration, and the security-migration nexus are the most pressing international relations issues. Research on refugees and concerns about asylum is particularly well-represented in the burgeoning topic of alternative voices in migration studies. Migration is a valuable negotiation tool in international relations and furthering state interests. Migration is a helpful instrument in international relations because it promotes diplomatic methods to accomplish migration-related goals. Separately, a country can use migratory diplomacy as an element of its foreign policy, but this has no impact on international relations (Adamson & Tsourapas, 2018). To preserve their territorial dominance, governments have a vested interest in enforcing border security and controlling immigration. Migrants are an important international issue because of the 258 million new arrivals in 2017. As part of his efforts to secure funding for a wall along the country's southern border, US President Donald Trump offered the Mexican government a combination of carrots and sticks (Tasente, 2021). Concerns over immigration and border security have dogged negotiations between the UK and the EU since the Brexit vote in 2016.
Migration diplomacy will continue for some years after the UK leaves the EU, with India asking that visas for workers be included in any future trade agreement with the UK. Political leaders in Europe are still arguing whether to include migration as a foreign policy issue for Turkey. Six billion euros have been paid to President Recep Tayyip Erdogan by the EU as a prize for tightening border controls for Syrian refugees trying to enter EU territory in 2016 (Beaujouan & Rasheed, 2019). Under the terms of the agreement, refugees who attempt to cross the Mediterranean Sea would be sent back to Turkey. This employment agreement was created because of Ethiopia's more flexible approach. More than $500 million in international support has been provided to Ethiopia's government to help employ some of Ethiopia's 900,000 refugees (Beaujouan & Rasheed, 2019). Countries increasingly rely on diplomatic means and processes to limit cross-border migration as part of their foreign policy goals. Global Compact on Migration, signed in late 2018, is a notable example of an intergovernmental agreement.
As another example of bilateral cooperation, Canada's long-standing seasonal agricultural laborers program with Mexico and other Caribbean countries allows for the temporary migration of farmworkers. Migrants' countries of origin can expel their citizens for no other reason than to send money back home if they want to gain political control over the nations of destination. Governments may choose to use migration policy as both an argumentative tool and a way of achieving other objectives, such as enhancing their security or advancing their economic interests. Concerning migratory diplomacy, states frequently deploy zero-sum and positive-sum negotiations as tools (Tsakloglou, 2019). A state's principal purpose in a zero-sum competition is to outperform its rivals. In 2015, Greece's defense minister, for example, frequently used this argument to secure a deal on the country's debt. According to Panos Kammenos, Greece was to be inundated by millions of economic migrants if the EU does not have a realistic solution (Tsakloglou, 2019). Muammar Gaddafi, Libya's former leader, used migratory diplomacy to obtain concessions from the European Union. He promised to turn Europe black by sending in African migrants and asylum seekers from other nations whenever he requested European money at various stages.
Global migration systems can be used as political bargaining chips by states that receive and transmit migrants, particularly in their power to restrict and negotiate migrant flows to and from other nations. The ability of a country to effectively regulate migration flows through diplomatic means and processes is influenced by other factors, such as global influence and available resources (Messina & Gallya Lahav, 2006). For example, strategic control of migrant flows can achieve many international relations objectives, including managing cross-border population movement for migration diplomacy. However, researchers' efforts do not imply that they have overlooked the importance of immigration and refugee policies in international relations. Even inside the OECD or EU frameworks, many academics investigate how countries of the destination link their immigration, asylum, and refugee policies to their foreign policy objectives. In foreign policy, the term 'diaspora politics' was coined to describe a new area of study in which the concept of 'constructivism' is central (Lyons, 2014). According to Lyon, despite the presence of many countries from the Global South, this research style tends to be more concerned with diasporic players than interstate interactions. As early as the 1990s, several researchers began focusing their attention on sending countries and domestic politics.
Interstate diplomacy is not as important as state–diaspora relations. With this plan, it is possible to demonstrate further the previously established analytical distinction between policies implemented by countries of immigration and policies implemented by governments of emigration. More than one sort of cross-border movement is difficult for developing countries, particularly those in the Global South, to analyze correctly. There are multiple levels of immigration policies in effect in Jordan, Egypt, and Turkey, and diaspora and refugee issues that cannot be examined from a unitary perspective regarding these countries' intended beneficiaries of the programs.
For instance, interdependence scientists think that connectedness, whether through international migration or other ways, enhances collaboration and stability in a democratic society, to name just two examples. The European Coal and Steel Community formation is one of the most notable. After the Second World War, the Treaty of Paris (1951) established a right to free movement of workers among the signatory countries to increase interstate cooperation. In the Global South, similar arguments have led to a lack of war and interstate collaboration; however, their impact on the United States has yet to be determined. Experts are concerned that migration could lead to more autocratic interstate relations than cooperative ones in insecurity studies. The ability of countries to generate crises of migration and refugee migration to exert influence on the host country's decision-making processes is examined by Greenhill in interstate relations.
Society is divided into the capitalists and the working class: a person's position is primarily the result of their production means. Exploitative power dynamics between capitalists and working-class people almost always lead to class conflict. As a result of class antagonism, capitalists are motivated to maximize their profits from the working class. To make as much money as possible, capitalists constantly seek to cut costs and exploit their workers. A frequent misconception is that social scientists do not share a consistent understanding of the primary socioeconomic strata in modern society. Classification is broken down into the upper, middle, and lower tiers in sociology. In today's capitalist culture, it is common for the wealthy to be descended from previous generations somehow.
As a result of their wealth and income, upper-class members enjoy a wide range of advantages. They can distinguish their way of life from the rest of society by engaging in culturally-related pastimes and having political influence. As historical precedent has shown, mining and manufacturing workers have historically functioned as a critical counterweight to society's higher strata in industrial civilization. Foodservice and retail sales workers are increasingly classed as working-class members. It is becoming increasingly essential to widen this definition to include these low-wage, non-unionized sectors. The working class can be divided into three groups based on their level of education and training. The three categories represent the various income levels in the United States of America. The working class is characterized by a lack of ownership and a reliance on salaries. Poor living conditions, limited access to higher education, and isolation from crucial decision-making processes are hallmarks of this syndrome. The most significant impact on working-class people has been felt since the middle of the twentieth century, even though living standards improved significantly during World War II due to a broad shift in the economy from manufacturing to service industries.
Traditional manufacturing industries have disappeared in the United States and the United Kingdom, leaving behind a core of chronically unemployed people isolated from the rest of society in decaying urban areas. There is a growing urban underclass of people who are either unemployed or working at lo...