Find a Qualitative Field Research Article

Find one scholarly article related to your research question that conducts qualitative field research. Read the article, and then write a one paragraph response to each of the following three questions. A good paragraph is a minimum of 3 sentences, preferably 5-7 sentences. Your submission should include an APA style cover page, and a reference page that references the article you read. Note: These are short answer questions, not an essay! You do not need to write an introduction and conclusion. You do need to cite as needed. Summarize the research project. Your summary should clearly identify the project’s research question. Describe the observation and sample observed and present the results of the project. What were the strengths of this research project? Consider both the methodology and the sample selection. For the methodology, think about the strengths of qualitative field research, and whether this project took advantage of those strengths. For sample selection, think about whether the project selected a truly representative sample. What were the weaknesses of this research project? Consider both the methodology and the sample selection. For the methodology, think about the weaknesses of qualitative field research, and whether this project fell prey to those weaknesses. For sample selection, think about whether the project selected a biased sample. For information on how to format your submission, as well as for APA style sample papers and templates, see the Writing Resources website Links to an external site.and APA Resources in Start here section. Rubric SOC 340 Written Communication Rubric (100 points) SOC 340 Written Communication Rubric (100 points) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 20 pts Distinguished Reveals a solid understanding of the proposed topic as evidenced by preliminary research and knowledge. 18.4 pts Proficient Identifies significant details of the proposed topic. Reveals an adequate understanding of the topic as evidenced by the amount of preliminary research. 16.6 pts Satisfactory Reveals a restricted understanding of the proposed topic. 14.8 pts Emerging Adds little detail to describe the proposed topic. 13 pts Unsatisfactory Does not identify the proposed topic. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization 20 pts Distinguished Well developed paragraphs. Sequencing enhances ideas and meaning. Ideas focused on central theme. 18.4 pts Proficient Smooth transition between paragraph with adequate structure and sequencing of ideas. 16.6 pts Satisfactory Transition between most paragraphs with limited paragraph structure. Sequence is not logical. 14.8 pts Emerging Some transition with poor paragraph structure and some evidence of planning. 13 pts Unsatisfactory No transition between paragraphs, ideas not in logical order. No structure to paragraphs. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelopment 20 pts Distinguished Ideas focus on the central theme. All ideas are clearly presented and unified. 18.4 pts Proficient Central theme is matched to the topic, most ideas explore the central theme, clear and unified. 16.6 pts Satisfactory Ideas are clear. Some ideas address the central theme. Central theme is linked to the topic. 14.8 pts Emerging Few idea address central theme. Ideas ramble and are difficult to identify. 13 pts Unsatisfactory Does not follow the theme with muddles unclear ideas. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConventions 20 pts Distinguished No errors noted. 18.4 pts Proficient 1 error -sentence structure -capitalization -grammar -presentation -general structure 16.6 pts Satisfactory 2-3 errors -sentence structure -capitalization -grammar -presentation -general structure 14.8 pts Emerging 4-5 errors -sentence structure -capitalization -grammar -presentation -general structure 13 pts Unsatisfactory Multiple errors -sentence structure -capitalization -grammar -presentation -general structure 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style 20 pts Distinguished No errors noted. 18.4 pts Proficient 1 error -cover page -in text citations -reference page -general format 16.6 pts Satisfactory 2-3 errors -cover page -in text citations -reference page -general format 14.8 pts Emerging 4-5 errors -cover page -in text citations -reference page -general format 13 pts Unsatisfactory Six (6) or more errors in: -cover page -in text citations -reference page -general format 20 pts Total Points: 100