Differences Traditional and Accelerated Bridge Construction Summary

Accelerated Bridge Construction
Student's Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Title
Due Date
Differences Traditional and Accelerated Bridge Construction
One of the fundamental disparities between Traditional and Accelerated Bridge construction is that the former has been utilizing the same or outdated approaches without any substantial changes in the designs' concepts. On the other hand, accelerated bridge construction uses innovative strategies, techniques, and planning to enhance bridges' construction without conceding safety. This approach also aims at minimizing traffic commotion to the maximum degree. It is mainly applied in new projects or to replace existing bridges. Sobala & Rybak (2017) have even mentioned that the significant difference between the two techniques is their construction management system's nature. They have further elucidated that the traditional bridge construction's construction management system usually ends up as a burden since they lead to gasoline wastage, significant traffic issues, and wastage of labor hours. They also require vast amounts of finance to maintain them. On the flip side, the construction management system of the accelerated bridge construction establishes ground-breaking planning that leads to the creation of durable and studier bridges that serve for more extended periods than those built by Traditional Methods.
Methods of Accelerated Bridge Construction
There are three particular methods of Accelerated Bridge construction, namely Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil-Integrated Bridge System (GRS-IBS), Slide-In Bridge Construction (SIBC), and Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems (Center for Accelerating Innovation, 2018). The GRS-IBS is a construction approach that closely combines granular soils and spaced geosynthetic fortification into new amalgamated material. This method is usually utilized to construct abutments that have a less likelihood of creating bumps at the end of any bridge. They are easy to build and uphold and are sixty percent more effective than most traditional constructi...