UPDATED 13. The process of human communication

The Process of Human Communication Name Institution Course and Code Professor Date The Process of Human Communication Topic 8: Social Attitudes of the Personality Aronson et al. (1999) depicts that the social attributions theory significantly affects individuals’ identities, meaning that they influence how people think, act, and feel during their social interactions. Notably, social attitudes affect how people behave and react to specific things they encounter, which is influenced by their opinions, beliefs, and experiences. Such attitudes represent the individual's preparedness and tend to reveal themselves depending on people’s reactions to and evaluation of social stimuli, forming the basis for interpersonal encounters. Self-perception and social comparison are highlighted directions by Barden and Horowcz (2008), stressing the intricate interconnections between the social context and self-concept. The interaction between personality and social prospects is interminable, and it shows the intricacy of the different personality traits and people's attitudes within social settings. In addition to the social influences theory proposed by Baron and Byrne (1991), external factors such as socializing will affect the attitude of consumers, which is another thing developed in depth. Sociologists have the sole right to give brilliant descriptions of the social and psychological effects that society exerts on the formation of social beliefs and their changes (Snyder & Ickes, 1985). Consequently, this approach gives room to provision and understanding of the constantly changing attitudes that are supported by external issues. Through these concepts, all the various cognitive aspects of social aspects of an individual’s personality are captured. Bootzin et al. (1991) give us an idea about the mental phenomena that bring social attitudes and personality to life, thus clarifying many stages of the complicated processes of people's perception. Such investigation exposes the cognitive intricacies of individuals as they attempt to make sense of and react to social cues. Specifically, social attitudes shape individuals’ interpersonal relationships, promotes trust, and cooperation. For instance, a reactive attitude enables people to respond to various situations proactively, particularly addressing the arising issues. Kenrick et al. (2003) argue that cognitive perspectives lead to the comprehension of the varied dynamics that form social values and the way cognition draws together individual reactions within the frameworks of society. Moreover, the social psychology of Miller (2004) has complex morals, which include morality. Therefore, it sounds natural to consider the ethical rating of social attitudes, demonstrating the inner voice that we all have when we are in public. In addition, the coordination of cognitive processes with the decision-making part puts the whole picture of social attitude in an integrated form to make it more holistic and involve the cognitive details and ethical perspective. The result of the crossroads of mind is the coalescence of infl...