100% (1)
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
2
Style:
APA
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 8.64
Topic:

RM-U9A

Essay Instructions:
Assignment Directions Using the Unit 9 Assignment Template, please respond to the following: Identify the source of error/bias in each scenario and the best way to work around it, and then respond to the associated question for each scenario. A common error that people make is interpreting causation from correlation. For example, when X and Y are correlated, people might assume that X causes Y, when there are actually three possibilities. Identify the three different ways that a correlation between X and Y could be interpreted. Define a confounding variable. What are the three different ways that a correlation between time spent outdoors and happiness could be interpreted? What is a possible confounding variable affecting the relationship between time spent outdoors and happiness? A researcher finds a correlation between smoking cigarettes and stress. What are three different ways that this could be interpreted? What is a possible confounding variable affecting the relationship between cigarettes and stress?
Essay Sample Content Preview:
Unit 9 Assignment Name: 1 Ways that a correlation between X and Y could be interpreted. Links between two variables X and Y can be fascinating but by no means demonstrate a causal relationship without more analysis. There are primarily three ways such a correlation can be interpreted:Causal Direction from X to Y: This way of thinking says that X is the cause of Y. In this case, the relationship is meant to be direct with Y being a result of changes in X. For example, more hours for studying (X) could improve exam scores (Y) (James & Irvine, 2020).Causal Direction from Y to X: However, the situation could be that Y is the cause of X. For instance, a student could get better exam scores (Y) and then study harder (X) either to boost their confidence or for a feedback loop.Presence of Confounding Variables: In most cases, a correlation between two variables is due to third variable, or a confounder. These moderators can affect both X and Y, which leads to the occurrence of spurious correlation that is the consequence of a cause-and-effect relationship between X and Y. Links between two variables X and Y can be fascinating but by no means demonstrate a causal relationship without more analysis. There are primarily three ways such a correlation can be interpreted:Causal Direction from X to Y: This way of thinking says that X is the cause of Y. In this case, the relationship is meant to be direct with Y being a result of changes in X. For example, more hours for studying (X) could improve exam scores (Y) (James & Irvine, 2020).Causal Direction from Y to X: However, the situation could be that Y is the cause of X. For instance, a student could get better exam scores (Y) and then study harder (X) either to boost their confidence or for a feedback loop.Presence of Confounding Variables: In most cases, a correlation between two variables is due to third variable, or a confounder. These moderators can affect both X and Y, which leads to the occurrence of spurious correlation that is the consequence of a cause-and-effect relationship between X and Y. 2 Confounding variable. Confounding variables are external factors that both X (independent variable) and Y (dependent variable) in a study are affected by, thus, resulting in a spurious influence between them. The confounder will make it difficult to see the actual effect that X has on Y or it may even create an untrue correlation in a situation where none exists. Determining and managing for confounders is critical to make sure one has valid and precise causal associations in research.Confounding variables are external factors that both X (independent variable) and Y (dependent variable) in a study are affected by, thus, resulting in a spurious influence between them. The confounder will make it difficult to see the actual effect that X has on Y or it may even create an untrue correlation in a situation where none exists. Determining and managing for confounders is critical to make sure one has valid and precise causal associations in research. 3 Ways that a correlation between time spent outdoors and happiness could be interpreted The relationship between spending time outdoors and experiencing happiness can be explored from several angles...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Sign In
Not register? Register Now!