System of Grievance Arbitration in Canada: Continue or Replace?
In a short 550 words response, provide three arguments why we should continue with the existing system of grievance arbitration in Canada AND three arguments why we should replace it with a different system.
The System of Grievance Arbitration in Canada
Student's Name
University, Department
Professor's Name
Course Number
Date
The System of Grievance Arbitration in Canada
Grievance arbitration has played a significant role in resolving labor disputes in Canada, thereby enhancing labor relations. This established process ensures fairness and impartiality in addressing employee concerns, fostering a harmonious work environment. Nevertheless, the system has drawbacks, prompting discussions about potential alternatives.
The existing grievances arbitration system keeps the employee-to-employer power relations even. Labor unions advocate for workers in arbitration, where both parties have an equal opportunity to bargain collectively. This setup enables employees to communicate on issues that bother them at work without fearing reprisal, promoting labor harmony (Hayes, 2020). The procedure involves negotiation, mediation, and arbitration, which is crucial and ensures no single-sided employer decision that may result in exploitative working conditions. Through the maintenance of the system, the welfare of the workers is preserved.
Moreover, the current