Destructive and Restorative Conflict Behaviors: Olympic Athlete's Drug Scandal
Prior to beginning work on this assignment,
Review Chapter 5: Negotiation Skills and Resolving Conflicts With Others from Week 3
Review Chapter 6: Dealing With Anger, Aggression, and Bullying from Week 4
Read Chapter 9: Apologies, Forgiveness, and Reconciliation
In your study on conflict management and conflict resolution, the literature has revealed three behaviors that could be helpful in managing a business or organizational-based conflict and three behaviors that could prove detrimental to a business-based conflict. In the short run, each behavior could lead to at least a win-lose situation for participants to the conflict. In the long run, some of the behaviors could produce a lasting win-win situation, while other behaviors could produce either a winner and a loser or even a lose-lose outcome where both parties could be declared losers.
In your paper,
Describe a drug-related scandal involving an athlete that occurred either at one of the Winter Olympics or one that occurred at one of the summer Olympics.
Supporting documentation is required.
Describe how conflict management using win-win negotiation could be useful in the situation (as described in the “Win-Win Negotiation” section of Chapter 5).
Describe how conflict management using distributive strategies could be useful in the situation (as described in the section “Negotiation Strategies” of Chapter 5).
Describe how conflict management using integrative strategies could be useful in the situation (as described in the section “Negotiation Strategies” of Chapter 5).
Argue whether the parties should use win-win, distributive, or integrative strategies to produce the best available outcome if the athlete is believed to be guilty (as listed in Chapter 5).
Examine which strategies or tactics should and should not be used by the athletes, the coaches of the athletes, the national governments of the athletes, and the International Olympic Committee.
Argue which behaviors should and should not be used by the athletes, the coaches of the athletes, the national governments of the athletes and the International Olympic Committee in order to gain the upper hand in the conflict (as listed in Chapter 6 [anger, aggression or bullying] and Chapter 9 [apologies, forgiveness and reconciliation]).
Determine whether the approaches that you selected also maintain the integrity of the Olympic games.
The Destructive and Restorative Conflict Behaviors paper
Must be four to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages and formatted according to APA Style. as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Formatting for Microsoft Word.
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper in bold font
Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.
Student’s name
Name of institution
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Due date
Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice. resource for additional guidance.
Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions. and Writing a Thesis Statement, refer to the Writing Center resources.
Must use, in addition to the required course textbook, at least three credible sources, including at least two Forbes.com articles. This means that the paper must include a minimum of four credible sources.
The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources. table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source.
To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view Quick and Easy Library Research, tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.
Must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your Paper.
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center. See the APA: Formatting Your References List resource in the Writing Center for specifications.
Text
Jandt, F. E. (2016). Conflict and communication. Sage.
Chapter 8: Online Dispute Resolution
Chapter 9: Apologies, Forgiveness, and Reconciliation
The full-text version of this ebook is available in your classroom through the RedShelf platform. Chapter 8 discusses the use of the internet and online communication technologies or online dispute resolution as a form of alternative dispute resolution. Chapter 9 discusses the impact the use of sincere apologies, forgiveness and/or reconciliation can have on two parties involved in a conflict. Chapter 8 will assist you with your Ethical Principles for Online Dispute Resolution discussion forum this week. Chapter 9 will assist you in your Destructive and Restorative Conflict Behaviors assignment this week.
Destructive and Restorative Conflict Behaviors
Student's Name
College/University
Course
Professor's Name
Due Date
Olympic Athlete's Drug Scandal
The 2022 Winter Olympics bore witness to a significant drug-related controversy surrounding Russian figure skater Kamila Valieva, who faced allegations of doping after her positive test for the prohibited substance trimetazidine. Despite the World Anti-Doping Agency's strict regulations to ensure fair competition and maintain the Games' integrity, Valieva's case ignited a contentious debate. Rather than accepting her provisional ban, Valieva and her legal team embarked on an appeal process, drawing significant attention to the issue (PBS News Hour, 2022). This decision thrust the matter into the international spotlight, dividing opinions within the sports community. Some vehemently supported her right to compete, emphasizing the complexities of her age and potential exposure to the substance through her grandfather's medication. In contrast, others, including athletes and proponents of stringent anti-doping measures, argued for her disqualification. Valieva's case has raised profound ethical questions surrounding the principles of fairness, integrity, and the role of anti-doping regulations in preserving equitable competition at the Olympic level.
Win-Win Negotiation in Olympic Drug Scandal
In light of Kamila Valieva's doping case at the Beijing Olympics, adopting win-win negotiation strategies is viable to resolve this complex matter. The chosen method should prioritize pursuing mutually beneficial solutions, engaging essential stakeholders like the International Olympic Committee (IOC), the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), and Kamila Valieva's legal counsel. These transparent dialogues should cultivate a profound comprehension of the interests and apprehensions held by all involved parties, with the primary objective of identifying areas of consensus (Jandt, 2016). This middle ground could entail carefully examining the circumstances surrounding Valieva's positive test for trimetazidine, including her legal defense's argument regarding contamination from her grandfather's medication. It allows Valieva to acknowledge unintended substance consumption while pursuing personal development and an adjusted anti-doping strategy. By emphasizing shared interests, such as upholding fair play, preserving the Olympics' integrity, and ensuring equitable competition, this negotiation approach can yield a resolution that addresses both anti-doping organizations' commitment to fairness and Valieva's quest for redemption and a just athletic opportunity.
Distributive Strategies for the Olympic Drug Scandal
In the context of Valieva's doping scandal, the involved entities may contemplate applying distributive conflict management strategies, also known as competitive or win-lose tactics. Under this approach, organizations like WADA and the IOC might insist on Valieva's complete exclusion from the Olympics as a punitive measure. Conversely, Valieva's legal representatives could argue for leniency or a reduced penalty, which could directly impact her eligibility to compete in the games (AP News, 2022). Distributive strategies are characterized by their assertiveness and a tendency to prioritize one party's interests over the other's, potentially resulting in a contentious resolution that may not comprehensively address the underlying ethical and fairness concerns associated with the doping scandal.
Integrative Strategies in the Olympic Drug Scandal
In the context of Kamila Valieva's doping scandal, integrative conflict management strategies offer a promising approach to resolving the situation. In order to tackle the underlying causes of doping violations effectively, the key stakeholders should be ready to engage in collaborative problem-solving. Implementing initiatives to increase athletes' awareness of prohibited substances, educate them about the associated risks, and foster an environment of fair and clean competition will also be more accessible. A more sustainable win-win solution can be achieved by collectively addressing these underlying issues and promoting athlete education (Jandt, 2016). This approach would allow Valieva to face appropriate penalties for her violation while enabling her to contribute to anti-doping efforts and be an agent for positive change in the sport. Integrative strategies prioritize long-term solutions that benefit all parties involved and have the potential to enhance the integrity of Olympic sports by addressing doping-related challenges at their source.
Choosing Conflict Resolution Strategies in Athlete's Guilt
When an athlete faces doping allegations, selecting an appropriate conflict management strategy becomes pivotal, given its substantial influence on the outcome and the overall integrity of the resolution process. Among the available approaches, int...