100% (1)
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
2
Style:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 7.2
Topic:

English composition 2 Touchstone 2.1: Evaluate a Source

Essay Instructions:
Touchstone 2.1: Evaluate a Source ASSIGNMENT: For this essay, you will select one of the sources that you intend to support your argument. Which source you choose is up to you; however, it should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length, and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested. The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source: After you recap your research paper’s central argument argument, provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.) You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels: Credibility (at least one full paragraph): Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author’s (or sponsor’s) trustworthiness. Usefulness (at least one full paragraph): Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)? Finally, you will include a conclusion which shows your final assessments on both counts. Sample Touchstone In order to foster learning and growth, all work you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any plagiarized or recycled work will result in a Plagiarism Detected alert. Review Touchstones: Academic Integrity Guidelines for more about plagiarism and the Plagiarism Detected alert. For guidance on the use of generative AI technology, review Ethical Standards and Appropriate Use of AI. A. Assignment Guidelines DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines. Refer to the Sample Touchstone for additional guidance on structure, formatting, and citation. 1. Source Identification The introduction of this paper will be introducing the source: ❒ Have you recapped your research paper’s central argument? ❒ Have you provided the author's name? ❒ Have you provided the source title? ❒ Have you provided the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)? ❒ Have you ended the introduction with a thesis statement that sums up your evaluation of the source’s credibility and usefulness? 2. Source Evaluation ❒ Have you provided an evaluation on the source's credibility in at least one full paragraph? ❒ Have you used specific, accurate page/paragraph-numbered examples from the source to illustrate your evaluation on credibility? ❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source's usefulness in at least one full paragraph? ❒ Have you used at least two specific quotations (cited with accurate page/paragraph-numbers) from the source to illustrate your evaluation of its usefulness? ❒ Did you include a reference list with complete source data such as author(s)’ name(s), date of publication, title, publication outlet or journal, an URL address (if available)? 3. Reflection ❒ Have you answered all reflection questions including specific and concrete examples that provide thoughtful insight in all responses? ❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment? B. Reflection Questions DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions. What types of questions did you ask yourself when evaluating the credibility and usefulness of your source? (2-3 sentences) How do you feel this evaluation practice will help you as you continue to move through the research process? (2-3 sentences) D. Requirements The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded: Composition must be 2 pages (approximately 500 to 550 words). Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins. Use a readable 12-point font. All writing must be appropriate for an academic context. Composition must be original and written for this assignment. Use of generative chatbot artificial intelligence tools (ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Bard) in place of original writing is strictly prohibited for this assignment. Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited. Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition. Include all of the assignment components in a single file. Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx. *****update from the client about the topic/source "No really is up to the writer,is fine whatever topic he chose.'
Essay Sample Content Preview:
Title Your Name Subject and Section Professor’s Name Date Source Identification In my research paper focusing on early intervention for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), I will be utilizing the protocol for a scoping review titled “Early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorder: protocol for a scoping review of economic evaluations” authored by Katherine Pye, Hannah Jackson, Teresa Iacono, and Alan Shiell. This protocol is a peer-reviewed paper published in BMC, which is one of the platforms of Springer Nature, a renowned scientific publication body. The guidelines create a process for a systematic review of the economic evaluations that were conducted regarding early intervention for children with ASD of this age group. Therefore, as a reliable source, it is an essential component of my research paper as it serves as a crucial premise for examining economic evaluations in the context of early intervention for individuals with the autism spectrum disorder. Source Evaluation The credibility of this source is supported by the fact that the article was written by authors who have expert knowledge and have the authoritative qualifications. Katherine Pye, Hannah Jackson, Teresa Iacono and Alan Shiell are known for their explorations in the healthcare economics and the field of Autism intervention. Their being members of highly respected academic institutions serve to confirm their reliability. Moreover, the protocol was disseminated via ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Sign In
Not register? Register Now!