Critical Assessment of TV Brands
INSTRUCTIONS:
PLease write a critical assessment of each using the following guidelines
* Identify the strengths of the discussion post.
* What did the author do well?
* What novel insights did the post provide?
* Identify the shortcomings of the discussion post.
* What could the author have done to improve the post?
*What did you learn from the discussion post?
PLEASE USE THIS POST BELOW TO WRITE THE CRITICAL ASSESSMENT.
If I am a consumer and had to buy a TV, there are several factors to consider how a consumer chooses or eliminates a product. While eliminating the brands of TV sets that are too risky to buy, an individual might eliminate the brands in the following order:
Company Samsung is low in all the performance criteria. The technology is not the latest compared to the price charged. In addition, performance in displaying clear colors, 3D angle, and not flickering is also low as per the information given.
Company Sony gives products at lower prices than that of the company Samsung. The performance in different spectrums is not satisfactory, the performance is even worse in displaying clear colors, not flickering screen and 3D angle, which is the main requirement of the customer.
The technology used by the Panasonic is latest and the price is less compared to the other two brands. However, the display showing different colors does not show clear colors. The glasses provided are not attractive but rather uncomfortable.
LG brand has proved to be satisfactory in all spectrums such as price, which is the lowest of all companies, and performance which is good. LG company's TV sets show clearer colors as compared to the TV sets of the other three brands. The 3d glasses, which come along with the TV sets, are also rechargeable by USB, which satisfies the main criterion of a consumer.
A consumer might eliminate Television (TV) brands, based on the risks that they carry, in the following order:
SAMSUNG
SONY
PANASONIC
LG
Professor
Course
Date
Critical Assessment
When comparing different brands, one should examine a similar product with a common checklist so that each brand can be examined according to its baseline. The author of this post tried to make a comparison for different television brands. He provided short descriptions for some products, but he failed to create an objective criterion. He also did not examine the type of consumers and merely judged the product from his perspective. This makes his argument weak, as he argues which brands are likely to be eliminated by a consumer based on the risks they carry.
The strength of this discussion post is in how it provides details to different brands in terms of the quality of their television set. It compares 4 various brands that are the most popular in the market. These brands are Samsung, Sony, Panasonic, and LG.
These 4 brands are among the top competitors in the television market because they offer good quality of their products. However, the technology and manufacturing techniques of each company are different from each other. The author did a good job in giving descriptions about some of these company’s products, and he offers his own opinions and insights about the performance of the gadgets that he examined.
However, the shortcoming of the author is that he did not specify the model of the products he compared. He should have mentioned the model so that the reader may be able to examin...