Mistrust in East Germany
If you are submitting a paper, answer ONE of these three questions on Anna Funder's book Stasiland:
1) At one point in Stasiland, 'Miriam' says: "Everyone [in the GDR] suspected everyone else, and the mistrust this bred was the foundation of social existence." (Page 28). Describe how this mistrust and suspicion manifested itself in ordinary life for East Germans.
2) How did East Germans who sincerely believed in the communist system like Karl-Eduard von Schnitzler justify to themselves the repression and lying that was a constant feature of the GDR's governing regime?
3) At another point in Stasiland, 'Miriam' says: "It is amazing what a revolution can do to people’s memories." (Page 46). How did former citizens of the GDR choose to remember the pre-1989 past in the years following the fall of the Berlin Wall and East Germany's unification with the West? To what extend did their memories alter or distort what had actually happened?
Your papers should be approximately 4-5 pages in length (papers significantly shorter than this will be penalized). Papers should be double-spaced, Times New Roman 12 point, 1" margins all round. No cover sheet or separate bibliography is necessary. Any standard citation format is fine so long as you use it consistently (but you should cite all uses of text, either when paraphrasing, summarizing, or directly quoting). Please make sure you include page numbers throughout and your name and the name of your TA on the first page.
Mistrust in East Germany
Student’s Name
Institution
Course Number and Name
Instructor’s Name
Date
Mistrust in East Germany
In the early 1960s, the communist government of East Germany, or the German Democratic Republic (GDR), resolved to build a wall separating it from West Germany. One of the fundamental reasons it gave for constructing the wall was to keep West Germans, derogatorily referred to as "' Fascists," from entering East Germany. It was supposedly an "Anti-Fascist" protective measure (Funder, 2003.). However, the principal function of the wall was to stop East Germans from defecting to the West. This is because numerous challenges in East Germany resulted in a mass exodus to the other side of Germany, where conditions were much more tolerable. One significant challenge in East Germany was political persecution, which, in turn, bred profound mistrust among citizens. The mistrust manifested itself in various dimensions, including massive suspicion and trickery.
Suspicion
The restrictive conditions in East Germany had conditioned citizens to never believe or trust any information without evaluating it critically, especially when interacting with strangers. One factor that considerably enhanced suspicion was the existence of the dreaded secret service known as the Stasi. The government relied extensively on this unit to maintain its grip on power and gave it autonomy to employ all means at its disposal to create as much fear as possible fear among East Germans. In her book, Ann Fundler explores the situation in depth by highlighting the escapades of Miriam, a sixteen-year-old girl who had unsuccessfully tried to flee East Germany. During interrogation after being arrested by the Stasi, Miriam gives a ridiculous story of how he met strangers in a hotel who offered to help her make good her escape (Funder, 2003). She is pleasantly surprised that the officers do not see through the gaping holes in the story. According to her, it is inconceivable in the GDR that one would ask a total stranger whether they lived near the border. In the same vein, it was improbable that one would ask a stranger whether they were planning to escape and offer a helping hand. In essence, interpersonal relationships among citizens dipped drastically since people could seldom believe anyone or anything. The possibility that one could unknowingly disclose secrets to undercover Stasi agents propagated intense suspicion and secrecy among people. Additionally, citizens viciously despised Stasi officers and never believed anything they said to them. Most probably, they took it as a ploy to squeeze information out of them. For example, when the officers informed Miriam that her parents no longer wanted anything to do with her following her arrest, she intimated that she did not believe the assertion (Funder, 2003). The officers could have been trying to make her desperate in order to solicit a dossier regarding her attempted escape.
Equally noteworthy, suspicion among East Germans seemed to supersede such demographic factors as age and gender. In short, so long as you were from the Eastern side of the German divide, the communist law applied to you accordingly. This is made clear in the experience that Miriam had to endure despite being only sixteen years old. Apparently, S...