Quality Improvement Proposal to Healthcare Organizations
Statistical Analysis: Identify a quality improvement opportunity in your organization or practice. In a 1,250-1,500 word paper, describe the problem or issue and propose a quality improvement initiative based on evidence-based practice. Apply "The Road to Evidence-Based Practice" process, illustrated in Chapter 4 of your textbook, to create your proposal.
Include the following:
Provide an overview of the problem and the setting in which the problem or issue occurs.
Explain why a quality improvement initiative is needed in this area and the expected outcome.
Discuss how the results of previous research demonstrate support for the quality improvement initiative and its projected outcomes. Include a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years, not included in the Class Resources or textbook, that establish evidence in support of the quality improvement proposed.
Discuss steps necessary to implement the quality improvement initiative. Provide evidence and rationale to support your answer.
Explain how the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated to determine whether there was improvement.
Support your explanation by identifying the variables, hypothesis test, and statistical test that you would need to prove that the quality improvement initiative succeeded.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Quality Improvement Proposal
Institutional Affiliation
Course Full Title
Instructor Full Name
Due Date
Quality Improvement Proposal
Health care is an essential part of everyone's life as human beings. Quality healthcare must always be provided to ensure that patient's health needs are met amicably. As a result, if a society does not have adequate and effective healthcare, it is vulnerable to harmful vices like destitution, high death rates, poor nutrition, and deaths resulting from terrible living conditions. Securing top-notch care in all healthcare facilities is a federal and state obligation. A high-quality healthcare system necessitates a variety of inputs from the facilities to ensure consistent and high-quality care. Other aspects that impact healthcare quality is institution administration, monetary and non-resources; the number of healthcare professionals; level of medical qualifications and experience; technology; staff well-being, and regulatory and legal issues. In order to deliver the best healthcare possible, healthcare institutions will implement numerous quality improvement programs based on evidence-based practices.
Emergency Department
Emergency department wait times have been a quality improvement opportunity in my organization. It is the job of a medical facility Emergency Unit (EU) to treat patients with a wide range of life-threatening or more minor life-threatening conditions, whether they are self-referred or brought in by doctors or other healthcare professionals. It also offers to accept and care for catastrophe casualties as part of its responsibilities concerning a specific geographic area. Additionally, Emergency unit high mortality rates can be significantly reduced if quick accessibility to emergency facilities is appropriately planned and managed. On the other side, unexpected deaths and health complications that may have been avoided can occur when the emergency does not meet the required standards. Hospitals that do not provide emergency services are required by evidence-based practice to show a prominent external sign or notice at the main entrance declaring this and offering the location of the nearest facility that does. The establishment of international criteria for access to emergency units serves as a guide for the goal of universal health care by 2030. When a hospital receives many unanticipated patient emergencies that require immediate attention at a specific time, the issue of prolonged emergency waiting times emerges. These occurrences take place at the exact moment. Patients who have been involved in accidents, natural disasters, disease outbreaks, or just a routine hospital visit may be considered emergency cases simultaneously. Hospitals should have adequate procedures to guarantee that emergencies are handled quickly and appropriately.
The Need and The Expected Outcome
The facility's Emergency Department requires a quality improvement project. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, emergency room visits in hospitals have increased by 20% in the last decade. In the same period, the number of facilities with an ER has dropped by 15%. The overpopulation of Emergency Departments has been primarily due to these two issues. This issue necessitates creative solutions from facilities. Emergency rooms must have enough staff to care for new patients as quickly as possible and discharge them to another level of care. There must be enough medical personnel (doctors, surgeons, medical officers, and ambulances.) on standby to receive emergency cases. A second way to shorten wait times at the emergency department is to have advanced medical equipment with the newest technology. The initiatives will aid in establishing quick diagnoses, allowing for rapid healthcare service. The program's goal is to improve the quality of treatment, reduce death rates, and improve the hospital's management.
Research and Its Projected Outcomes
ED overcrowding has been shown to affect patient outcomes and the ability of personnel to follow guidelines. According to Morley and other researchers, they realized a discrepancy between the sources of the problem and the proposed solutions. Most of the reasons for ED overcrowding and delays in the patient release were attributed to patient flow efficiency inside the ED (Morley et al.,2018). The adoption of whole-of-system measures to fulfill timely patient discharge criteria and longer primary care hours showed encouraging results.
After conducting a study, Yarmohammadian and other researchers concluded that reducing the number of people increases the effectiveness of their operations. Patients should be grouped and cared for in separate locations with resources tailored to their requirements. A team's indirect responsibilities cannot be adequately described without accounting for the amount of time spent on each patient (Yarmohammadian et al.,2017). Because of the lack of resources, team triage cannot be implemented if sick patients are forced to wait for 24 hours at the expense of minor injuries. Over the past few years, the Emergency Department (ED) has been under scrutiny and considerable public pressure. The situation has resulted in a demoralized staff that was no longer interested in quality improvement (Bannon & Greenwood, 2017). QI projects had devolved into a data-gathering exercise, with little thought given to how they may ...