Compare and Contrast Leadership Styles of Servant Leaders, Interviews

Identify three nursing leaders you would like to interview for this paper. The nursing leaders may have a variety of leadership styles, but they must all currently hold positions of leadership.Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that describes the results of the interviews and addresses the following:1. Ask the leaders what they believe is their preferred leadership style and ask them to describe how that style has helped them achieve success.2. Explain why you chose each individual leader.3. Identify, compare, and contrast their styles and note any examples of servant or transformational leadership.4. Identify missed opportunities or questions you wish you had asked during the interviews.Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

RUBRIC

1

No submission

0.00%

2

Unsatisfactory

75.00%

3

Less than Satisfactory

80.00%

4

Satisfactory

88.00%

5

Good

92.00%

6

Excellent

100.00%

70.0 %

Content

20.0 %

Identify Leader's Preferred Leadership Style(s) and How it Has Benefited Them

None

Content neglects to address some or all areas of leadership style identification, preferred leadership styles, and how chosen leadership style has benefited leader as addressed by assignment criteria.

Content minimally addresses some or all areas of leadership style identification, preferred leadership styles, and how chosen leadership style has benefited leader as addressed by assignment criteria.

Content covers all areas of leadership style identification, preferred leadership styles, and how chosen leadership style has benefited leader as addressed by assignment criteria.

Content is accurate in covering all areas of leadership style identification, preferred leadership styles, and how chosen leadership style has benefited leader as addressed by assignment criteria.

Content is comprehensive and accurate in covering all areas of leadership style identification, preferred leadership styles, and how chosen style leadership has benefited leader as addressed by assignment criteria, along with thoughtful reflection.

20.0 %

Interviewer Explains Why He She Chose Each Leader Interviewed

None

Interviewer neglects to explain why he or she chose each leader interviewed.

Interviewer does not adequately explain why he or she chose each leader interviewed.

Interviewer adequately explains why he or she chose each leader interviewed.

Interviewer offers detailed reasons about why he or she chose each leader interviewed.

Interviewer offers detailed reasons about why he or she chose each leader interviewed, while demonstrating reflective thought.

20.0 %

Compare and Contrast Leadership Styles of Servant Leaders

None

Interviewer neglects to compare and contrast leadership styles of servant leaders.

Interviewer neglects to adequately compare and contrast leadership styles of servant leaders.

Interviewer adequately compares and contrasts leadership styles of servant leaders.

Interviewer compares and contrasts leadership styles of servant leaders in a detailed manner.

Interviewer compares and contrasts leadership styles of servant leaders in a detailed manner, while offering thoughtful reflection.

10.0 %

Interviewer Notes Examples of Servant Leadership or Missed Opportunities During the Interview

None

Content neglects to cover examples of servant leadership and or missed opportunities during the interview.

Content is minimal in its coverage of examples of servant leadership and or missed opportunities during the interview.

Content accurately covers examples of servant leadership and missed opportunities during the interview.

Content accurately covers examples of servant leadership and missed opportunities during the interview while providing detail.

Content accurately covers examples of servant leadership and missed opportunities during the interview while providing detail along with thoughtful reflection.

20.0 %

Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %

Thesis Development and Purpose

None

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and or main claim are insufficiently developed and or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

20.0 %

Organization and Effectiveness

8.0 %

Argument Logic and Construction

None

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

20.0 %

Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %

Mechanics of Writing (Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.)

None

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %

Format

5.0 %

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

None

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %

Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style.)

None

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

100 %

Total Weightage