Experimental Analysis: IISCA (Interview-Informed Synthesized Contingency Analysis)
The highest level of scientific investigation demonstrated in the FBA is the experimental analysis. The experimental analysis exemplifies the rigor of control as the practitioner manipulates environmental variables to evoke and abate the problem behavior. The consistent control of evoking and abating the target behavior demonstrates the functional relationship between environmental variable(s) and the target behavior(s).
For this assignment, select an experimental analysis of problem behaviors such as the Iwata’s full functional analysis (FA), brief FA, latency-based FA, trial-based FA, precursor FA, or the IISCA. Provide the benefits and limitations of the selected experimental analysis. Describe the conditions of your experiment to test the hypothesized function(s) or contingencies influencing the behaviors of concern. Provide hypothetical data and a visual display (graph). Be sure to incorporate values of compassion and cultural humility when selecting and conducting the experimental analysis. You can refer to the Capella Compassion Code [DOCX] for more details.
Part 1: Select the Experimental Analysis
Select the experimental analysis to be conducted for your functional behavior assessment. Provide the benefits and limitations of the selected experimental analysis. Provide a rationale for why you have chosen this method for the person or character you chose in your first assignment. Please include in your rationale how you considered compassionate approaches when selecting your experimental analysis.
Part 2: Describe the Experimental Analysis
Describe the conditions and procedures of your experimental analysis. Be sure to program for the appropriate establishing operations as suspected from the descriptive assessment. Please include in your rationale how you considered compassionate approaches when conducting your experimental analysis.
Part 3: Display Hypothetical Data and Interpret Results
For ethical reasons, DO NOT conduct an actual experimental analysis of behavior for this assignment. Instead, generate hypothetical data to show outcomes you might expect if you were to conduct the experimental analysis. Present the hypothetical data and result of the experimental analysis in a visual display. Be sure to use an appropriate graph to display the data, demonstrating experimental control. Interpret the results.
Part 4: Conclude the Experimental Analysis
Conclude the results of the experimental analysis by providing a confirmation of the functional control between environmental variables and problem behaviors. In other words, confirm the function(s) influencing problem behaviors. For the IISCA, confirm the functional control between the synthesized contingencies and problem behaviors.
Additional Requirements
Your assignment should meet the following requirements:
-APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style guidelines. Review Evidence and APA for more information on how to cite your sources.
-Resources:3
-Length: 4
-Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point.
Experimental Analysis
Your Name
University
Behavior Analytic Assessments
Professor
Month Date, 2021
Experimental Analysis
When conducting an experimental analysis, it is essential to use the most appropriate tools to gather the required data. The proposed hypothetical study is an examination of procrastination as a problem behavior in an 8-year-old child with ADHD. IISCA will be the tool that shall be used to collect the data required to formulate a hypothesis and develop the experimental conditions.
Selection of Experimental Analysis
The ideal experimental analysis that can be conducted to address procrastination in an 8-year-old with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is the IISCA (Interview-Informed Synthesized Contingency Analysis). The IISCA is a functional assessment approach that involves conducting interviews with individuals familiar with the target behavior to develop a hypothesis about the function or reasons behind the behavior (Coffey et al., 2020). The information gathered from the interviews guides the development of experimental conditions to test the hypothesis, and the results of the experiment are used to refine the hypothesis and guide the development of effective behavior change strategies. It is based on the idea that behavior is shaped by its consequences, and that understanding the contingencies that maintain the behavior is essential for developing effective interventions.
Benefits of the Selected Experimental Analysis
Four main benefits are associated with the application of IISCA for functional behavior assessments. First, the tool allows for the development of tailored hypotheses. That is, the tool collects information from people who are conversant with the target behavior facilitating the development of hypotheses specific to the behavior in question. Second, the IISCA approach allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the target behavior by considering multiple sources of information, including the antecedents, and consequences, and maintaining contingencies of the behavior (Jessel et al., 2019). Third, IISCA facilitates data-driven decision-making in that it involves the use of experimental methods to collect data on the target behavior. Fourth, the IISCA facilitates a collaborative approach between the researcher and individuals who are familiar with the target behavior, allowing for a more collaborative and holistic approach to functional behavior assessment (Jessel et al., 2019). Therefore, IISCA has its benefits in the process of functional behavioral assessment.
Limitations of the Selected Experimental Analysis
On the other hand, it is essential to consider several limitations that one should consider when using IISCA for functional behavioral assessment. First, the IISCA approach heavily relies upon self-report and interviews with individuals who are familiar with the target behavior. The approach is limited by potential subjective bias, which is likely to have a significant effect on the overall accuracy or completeness of the assessment (Coffey et al., 2020). Second, IISCA may not be practical in all settings as it is time-consuming and costly. To this end, one must collect information, develop a hypothesis, conduct experimental analysis, and use specialized equipment that is highly likely to be cos...