Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
3
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 12.96
Topic:
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Nadroparin in Preventing Deep-Vein Thrombosis
Essay Instructions:
Please see attachment , use article that are 5 years old or less and must be peer reviewed. This is capstone project is a continuation putting all together regard the total knee replacement use of heparin in prevention of deep venous thrombosis vs mechanical devices. Thank you very much.
Using 800-1,000 words, discuss methods to evaluate the effectiveness of your proposed solution and variables to be assessed when evaluating project outcomes.
Example: If you are proposing a new staffing matrix that is intended to reduce nurse turnover, improve nursing staff satisfaction, and positively impact overall delivery of care, you may decide the following methods and variables are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of your proposed solution:
Methods:
- Survey of staff attitudes and contributors to job satisfaction and dissatisfaction before and after initiating change.
- Obtain turnover rates before and after initiating change.
- Compare patient discharge surveys before change and after initiation of change.
Variables:
1.Staff attitudes and perceptions.
2.Patient attitudes and perceptions.
3.Rate of nursing staff turnover.
Develop the tools necessary to educate project participants and to evaluate project outcomes (surveys, questionnaires, teaching materials, PowerPoint slides, etc.).
Essay Sample Content Preview:
Evaluation Plan
Student:
Professor:
Course title:
Date:
Evaluation Plan
This paper provides a discussion on the methods that would be utilized in evaluating the effectiveness of my proposed solution, as well as the variables that would be assessed when evaluating the project outcomes. In this project, the problem that has been identified is adults who have undergone total knee replacement (TKR) developing deep-vein thrombosis after the TKR surgery. The proposed solution is the use of low-molecular-weight heparin, also known as nadroparin, in preventing deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) after TKR surgery. The outcomes include a reduction in the likelihood of getting DVT following TKR surgery, patient satisfaction, healthcare worker satisfaction, and improved quality of life of the patient who underwent total-knee replacement surgery.
Methods to evaluate effectiveness of the proposed change
To measure the effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparins, patients who have undergone total knee replacement would be administered a single subcutaneous injection of LMWH per day and it will be in the form of nadroparin calcium, and the dose shall be adapted to the patient’s body-weight. The medication would be administered 6 hours after the TKR surgery for a period of 10 days. It would be started 6 hours after the surgery since if commenced too soon, it could lead to a risk of bleeding. The risk of developing DVT is usually about two weeks after TKR surgery (Blanchard et al., 2010).
Measurements as to whether the patients have developed DVT or not would be performed on Days 7, 11, 17 and 21, and they would be monitored for a period of 3 weeks. The wound area would be assessed using a subjective visual analog scale. With the use of this method, if the incidence of venographically proven DVT is above 1% on any of these days following the TKR surgery, then the proposed solution would be considered as to have been ineffective. Conversely, the proposed solution would be regarded as a success and effective if incidences of venographically proven DVT are at 1% or lower (Bounameaux, 2011). This will connote that LMWH has been effective in the prevention and reduction of DVT incidence following TKR. It is of note that LMWH is well-known to lower the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis by 87 percent in uncontrolled groups and by 99% in control groups (Argun et al., 2013).
The other method that would be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed solution is by comparing with mechanical prophylaxes. This would be done by splitting the patient population into 2 groups comprising an equal number of subjects – each comprising 20 patients. Mechanical prophylaxes would then be administered in appropriate dosages 6 hours following TRK surgery to 20 patients for a period of 10 days. The other group of 20 patients would be administered one dosage of LMWH per day for 10 days. Monitoring would be done for a period of 3 weeks on Days 5, 12, 16 and 21. If the LMWH group exhibits lower rates of DVT relative to the mechanical prophylaxes group, then LMWH would be considered as more effective, otherwise, it will not.
Variables to be assessed when evaluating project outcomes
Staff perceptions and attitudes: this is a key variable due to the fact that the success and efficacy of the proposed change to a great extent is dependent on how the hospital’s healthcare workers will perceive it. In essence, the proposed change would be successful and effective if these workers are receptive to it and have a positive attitude towards it. By having an affirmative attitude and assenting perception toward the proposed change, they will easily accept it without any resistance and they will not try to thwart its implementation. On the other hand, if they have pessimistic perception and negative attitudes toward the proposed change, then they would tend to be resistant to the change and thwart its implementation, something that would make the proposed change be ineffective and unsuccessful (Bounameaux, 2011).
The other variable that would be assessed wh...
Student:
Professor:
Course title:
Date:
Evaluation Plan
This paper provides a discussion on the methods that would be utilized in evaluating the effectiveness of my proposed solution, as well as the variables that would be assessed when evaluating the project outcomes. In this project, the problem that has been identified is adults who have undergone total knee replacement (TKR) developing deep-vein thrombosis after the TKR surgery. The proposed solution is the use of low-molecular-weight heparin, also known as nadroparin, in preventing deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) after TKR surgery. The outcomes include a reduction in the likelihood of getting DVT following TKR surgery, patient satisfaction, healthcare worker satisfaction, and improved quality of life of the patient who underwent total-knee replacement surgery.
Methods to evaluate effectiveness of the proposed change
To measure the effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparins, patients who have undergone total knee replacement would be administered a single subcutaneous injection of LMWH per day and it will be in the form of nadroparin calcium, and the dose shall be adapted to the patient’s body-weight. The medication would be administered 6 hours after the TKR surgery for a period of 10 days. It would be started 6 hours after the surgery since if commenced too soon, it could lead to a risk of bleeding. The risk of developing DVT is usually about two weeks after TKR surgery (Blanchard et al., 2010).
Measurements as to whether the patients have developed DVT or not would be performed on Days 7, 11, 17 and 21, and they would be monitored for a period of 3 weeks. The wound area would be assessed using a subjective visual analog scale. With the use of this method, if the incidence of venographically proven DVT is above 1% on any of these days following the TKR surgery, then the proposed solution would be considered as to have been ineffective. Conversely, the proposed solution would be regarded as a success and effective if incidences of venographically proven DVT are at 1% or lower (Bounameaux, 2011). This will connote that LMWH has been effective in the prevention and reduction of DVT incidence following TKR. It is of note that LMWH is well-known to lower the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis by 87 percent in uncontrolled groups and by 99% in control groups (Argun et al., 2013).
The other method that would be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed solution is by comparing with mechanical prophylaxes. This would be done by splitting the patient population into 2 groups comprising an equal number of subjects – each comprising 20 patients. Mechanical prophylaxes would then be administered in appropriate dosages 6 hours following TRK surgery to 20 patients for a period of 10 days. The other group of 20 patients would be administered one dosage of LMWH per day for 10 days. Monitoring would be done for a period of 3 weeks on Days 5, 12, 16 and 21. If the LMWH group exhibits lower rates of DVT relative to the mechanical prophylaxes group, then LMWH would be considered as more effective, otherwise, it will not.
Variables to be assessed when evaluating project outcomes
Staff perceptions and attitudes: this is a key variable due to the fact that the success and efficacy of the proposed change to a great extent is dependent on how the hospital’s healthcare workers will perceive it. In essence, the proposed change would be successful and effective if these workers are receptive to it and have a positive attitude towards it. By having an affirmative attitude and assenting perception toward the proposed change, they will easily accept it without any resistance and they will not try to thwart its implementation. On the other hand, if they have pessimistic perception and negative attitudes toward the proposed change, then they would tend to be resistant to the change and thwart its implementation, something that would make the proposed change be ineffective and unsuccessful (Bounameaux, 2011).
The other variable that would be assessed wh...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now: