Concept Paper on Peak Performance in Production

Concept Paper Final
Student’s Name
Institution affiliation
Course Name
Instructor’s Name
Date
Concept Paper Final
Statement of the Problem
Peak performance in production, ability to work under pressure with no supervision, vibrancy, and tenacity are among the many considerations of a good employee. Underperformance in any field and sector can be regarded as a loophole to any company’s failure. Availability of human resource unit is to ensure that only peak and replenished production is attained at any moment. The prime core and vision of any sector can be attained through the incorporation and close monitoring of the production level of its workers. The actual cost of failing to manage poor and unscrupulous performance can be staggering. Its worst result can be a great stagnation and underdevelopment and a predicted closure of the company. A single employee’s underperformance can negatively affect a company, leading to massive loss of motivation, effectiveness, and service quality (Aguinis, 2019). This could cause a production imbalance through the output and input mismatch.
Assessing the effect of lousy job performance and addressing it as soon as possible is critical and very core in gauging the production level and guaranteeing the company’s security from bankruptcy. Employee performance vetting can significantly help reduce the negative aspect in the corporation by conducting frequent appraisals and evaluations, which could help reduce and castigate underperformance (Goodhew et al., 2008). The article, therefore, aims at determining the effect, causal and possible result of underperformance within the employees and the measures to curb and mitigate its adverseness. Employees’ spirit, vibrant, tenacity, and ferociousness are critical to the organization’s success in improving productivity and effectiveness.
Need for the Research
Poor performance should concern both management and staff. Failure to consider employees’ performance can land any company to ditch. It is essential and should be considered the main aim of senior executives to perform serious appraisals periodically since it is an indicator of the performance of the organization’s leaders. Having a program that controls the workers’ productivity level can be of vital importance’s heart and the basis of the company’s stand and guarantee that the firm is solely merged in its employees prefinance. On the other side, corporations may not always consider reacting positively to poor performance - a tricky nut to crack. Addressing poor performance can be a challenge and critical role that many firms mainly overlook. As a backdrop, it is no surprise that many businesses decline to respond to it since it is either not in the program or the heads and the senior’s production level is questionable (Goodhew et al., 2008). Poor performance adversely influences its reputation, which significantly affects its production trust to its customers and the potential customers. Also, individual reputation can befall victim by a track record of underperformance.
Poor performance must not be ignored since it might escalate to unrepairable situations, prompting the customers to lose faith and use the legal system. The worse of it is a downfall of the firm due to the capital imbalance on output overtaking the input. Poor work performance besmirches the organization’s reputation, makes the environment chaotic, and demotivates hardworking employees (Aguinis, 2019). It will also result in an upsurge in crime. Over and beyond, individuals are ashamed to be connected with an underperforming program or institution. As a result, the station’s productivity should be assessed on the performance chart and then contrasted to other programs, putting the facility’s administration and members on notice as the lowest ranking station. Embracing departmental evaluation through close relations and monitoring its workers should be considered a prime duty towards this menace.
Productivity is one of the most critical aspects of an organization’s corporate promotion, development, vision, mission embracement, and future security guarantee. The most crucial level of performance is growing extremely hard to achieve due to the ongoing growth of enterprises and the steady growth in company standards (Goodhew et al., 2008). Not only does it necessitate high-quality products and services, but it also necessitates high-performing staff through appreciation of the vibrant and production-minded ones. The more significant the company’s competitive advantage, the more employees go above and beyond. Having a frequent appreciation of the worker’s interest and passion can trigger and encourage them to improve their productivity and output replenishment. A great organization will consistently recruit and retain top talent (Aguinis, 2019). Performance is critical in the corporation’s operations and success in new markets, given the low homogeneity and persistent improvement expectations.
Objectives of the Research
The research paper seeks to find the causal, effect, and solution on handling the situation of poor performance in an organization. The success of any firm can be traced closely by the tenacity of its workers, and this remains to be a factor that can be overlooked. The many objectives the paper aims to consider include:
1 To determine the influence of skills, expertise, and know-how on employee output in an organization.
2 To determine the impacts of leadership vibrancy, elegance, and positivity on employees’ production in an organization.
3 To establish the effects and the prime part of motivation on employees’ productivity.
4 To determine how performance appraisal and consistent valuation influences workers’ productivity. 
5 To set better strategies, ways, and modes of managing performance in an organization. 
6 To determine remedies and possible solutions for poor performance.
A Preliminary Review of Literature
Production management and frequent appraisal should be such a core sector in any firm. The security of any company is always tied to the vibrancy of its appraisal and production management team (Buthina, 2020). Performance management is now viewed as a future-oriented structure, participatory, and continual in developing markets, with a constant loop of criterion formulation, monitoring, assessments, analysis and adjustments, policy initiatives, and resources and effort. Creating a high-performance culture is the top manager’s job; nonetheless, performance management is crucial for organizational effectiveness (Goodhew et al., 2008). Productivity management is the technique to task allocation and anticipation, ongoing performance monitoring, frequent performance evaluations, performance capacity building, and excellent performance reimbursement (Aguinis, 2019). In terms of personnel, high-tech companies are cutting staff in developed countries to focus their resources on emerging regions.
The opportunity cost of retaining unscrupulous, underperforming, and unskilled employees will eventually lead to low or stagnation in performance production (Buthina, 2020). As a result, the higher the bargaining cost, the greater the performance uncertainty inside the employer-worker transaction. Value addition can only be done over time when the transfer object is sophisticated, raising performance uncertainty (Aguinis, 2019). As a result, the degree of requirements and perceptions must be conveyed as directly as feasible (Ejsmont,2021). Communication is also crucial, and one should pay great attention to how it is carried out as effectively as possible. It is worth mentioning that three communication properties must be addressed for this to work: regularity, bidirectionality, and reliability. According to Goodhew et al. (2008), due to successful communication, co...