100% (1)
page:
7 pages/≈1925 words
Sources:
1
Style:
APA
Subject:
Communications & Media
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 27.72
Topic:

Friends with Benefits Relationships and their Attractiveness

Essay Instructions:

The assimilation paper assignment combines and examines the information from three theories discussed in class to explain a phenomenon common in identity formation or close relationships. For this paper, you will choose any phenomenon that you all have witnessed or experienced in the context of personal identity or personal relationships. Some examples of topics include, but are not limited to, self-esteem, body image, narcissism, shyness, jealousy, sexual intimacy, conflict, relational abuse, aggressiveness, humor, “cold feet,” stalking, long-distance relationships, power, emotion, infidelity, “hooking up,” “friends with benefits,” sexting, online dating, speed dating, and divorce, to name a few. You should pick a topic that you consider to be a fascinating aspect of relationships and human interaction.



Because I can't upload videos, I need writers to log in to my canvas to find three theories



canvas rutgers

https://canvas(dot)rutgers(dot)edu/

logins - Ask support



Found 04:192:355:B1 INTERPERSONAL COMM

Materials are in the media gallery



Essay Sample Content Preview:

Friends with Benefits Relationships and their Attractiveness Introduction
The conventional aspects of developing intimate relationships have changed in recent times. Trust and communication develop meanwhile make such contacts possible. More than ever, intimacy is achieved through direct contact with others. Traditionally, intimacy is achieved after building a good relationship and a deep bond. However, in the cultural context, intimacy is achieved from the beginning of the relationship. This relationship leads to the development of a new phenomenon known as Friends with Benefits or FWB. It allows the partners to follow intimate relationships without being emotionally involved.
FWB relationships consist of a combination of friendship and sexual intimacy, often characterized by an intimate romantic relationship without direct commitment. Many of these relationships did not develop into romance, and questions arose about what would become of the relationship after the FWB ended. The positive value of this relationship can be explained by the number of young people communicating in the context of FWB
FWB relationship analysts define the phenomenon as the sexual activity between strangers or acquaintances, usually once and without waiting for a future sexual experience with the partners. This phenomenon can be viewed from different angles. In this assimilation paper, FWB is deliberately explored and discussed in the light of three communication theories, including Relational Dialectics Theory, Affection Exchange Theory, and Predicted Outcome Value Theory.
Friends with Benefits Relationships and their Attractiveness
Intimacy has been conventionally regarded as a stable romantic relationship, marriage, and romance. Indeed, sex has been explored in recent decades in the framework of commitment, seriousness, or formal relationship that define obligation, love, and uniqueness (Guerrero et al., 2017). There are two types of secondary ties in current sexuality studies, depending on the type of relationship. On the one hand, long-term relationships involve commitment and love, while a short-term relationship is also called an irregular and normal relationship, so it defines open sex. Although it is a subset of normal sexual intercourse, the category of FWB has integrally romantic features, namely sexual interest and intimacy. Therefore, it is called the hybrid connection, which does not express true friendship or love but shows both qualities.
It is crucial to consider the aspects of FWB's origin to understand this phenomenon's increasing ratio. The predicted outcome value theory develops a greater understanding of the FWB relationship among the current generation. Guerrero et al. (2017) mentioned that the predicted outcome value theory emphasizes the notion that individuals are more interested in maximizing the rewards and minimizing the costs.
It is the basis of the philosophy of the FWB relationship. In this case, the reward will soon reach close contact. Again, the cost of reaching this point is usually the time and effort invested in the relationship. To gain sexual advantage from a relationship, couples often agree to take up the position without fully considering the trust or communication required. To choose the right partner for this way of communicating, it is crucial to ask the right questions to see if the goals are shared.
A growing body of evidence reveals that as uncertainty decreases through learning positive information, attractiveness increases; negative information becomes known through the attractiveness of uncertainty (Guerrero et al., 2017). In the context of the FWB, this is the most common site for positive news links.
People looking for traditional relationships express what is considered harmful in this context. It is only seen negatively, as it contradicts the goals of partners wishing to become FWBs. Unlike traditional relationships, which initially focus on getting to know each other and the depth and breadth of the conversation, the FWB jumps straight to the question of where the sex drive is.
Endorsement of Friends with Benefits associated with Traditional Relationships Disadvantages
A closer look at the subject revealed that the mistakes were more than the effort required to maintain the relationship. Obstacles are also sought when a person formally enters into a romantic relationship. These unavoidable growth pains are classified as relational dialectic tensions (Guerrero et al., 2017). Such aspects may be indicated in the relational dialectic theory that highlights the potential problems partners face in trying to join.
Indeed, the transition from goals and objectives to formal relations is essential. Personal perspectives have changed and are now part of an integrated whole. Guerrero et al. (2018) explained that the dialectical view proposes that relationships do not always grow smoothly and linearly and that partners do not always move in a similar place and direction.
In addition, FWB brings together cognitive, highly coherent assessment components, emotionally related responses, and intermediate components (Guerrero et al., 2017). The two, vulnerability and cognition, are certainly linked. In the context of sexual health, the question arose as to whether caring friends expressed a positive emotional response that would contribute to or negatively affect the participants' mental health.
It is a controversial and unresolved issue among experts as, as mentioned above, it does not create a clean relationship with the friends involved and seems to be little explored. Researchers have traditionally associated friendships and romantic relationships with mental health.
It is difficult to follow a different lifestyle after the change. The beginning of a romantic relationship is no exception (Guerrero et al., 2017). The individuals’ values, life goals, and lifestyles must be integrated with others. It can cause friction in the relationship as it has to be sacrificed. Research indicated that traditional relations create problems that couples face when creating a romantic relationship.
These problems ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Sign In
Not register? Register Now!