100% (1)
page:
1 pages/≈275 words
Sources:
2
Style:
Other
Subject:
Accounting, Finance, SPSS
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 6.32
Topic:

Night Club Price Analysis in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)

Coursework Instructions:
    Caucasian individuals go more frequently to the nightclub by 176 than another ethnic group—Hispania's followed by a frequency of 47, then African Americans by a frequency of 12. Pacific Islanders go less frequently of 2 than any other ethnic group. Asians, Native Americans, and other ethnic groups have a close frequency of 4, 4, and 5Part 1 – Descriptives - 50 points Create descriptive statistics for all demographic variables. Report means or frequencies depending on the type of variable and include graphs when applicable
    Gender
    Age
    Ethnicity
    Income
    employment status
    education
    Compute new variables:
    Perceived_Fairness - Average of Fair 1, 2 and 3
    Word_of_mouth - Average of WOM 1, 2 and 3
    Return_Intention - Average of RI 1, 2 and 3
    Familiarity - Average of FAM 1 and 2
    Create descriptive statistics for newly computed variables and report means and standard deviations. 
    Conduct Principal component analysis with Oblimin rotation on 9 variables (Fair1, Fair2, Fair3, WOM1, WOM2, WOM3, RI1, RI2, RI3)
    Use absolute value bellow 0.4
    Recognize and name extracted factors. 
    Save Factor sores as variables using Regression
    Calculate Cronbach’s alpha for each new factor
    Report results
    Use appropriate tests to test out following hypotheses:
    H1: The average age is higher than 25 years.
    H2: Frequent customers have higher word-of-mouth (use variable that you calculated for part 1) than first time customers.
    H3: Familiarity with the type of pricing strategy (FAM1) has a median lower than 4 on a scale from 1-7
    H4: Familiarity with the type of pricing strategy (FAM1) has a higher median for frequent customers compared to first-time customer.
    H5: Female customers are more likely to be first-time customers compared to male customers that are more likely to be frequent customers
    Use 7-step approach and report results for each hypothesis Part 2 - Factor analysis - 50 points Part 3 – Hypothesis testing 1- 50 points Part 4 – Hypothesis testing 2 – Analysis of Variance - 50 points
    Conduct 5x2 full-factorial ANOVA
    Test following hypotheses:
    H6: First time customers have higher overall perceived price fairness compared to frequent customers.  
    H7: Customer type (Frequent customer vs. First time customer) moderates the relationship between type of pricing strategy and perceived price fairness (calculated in part1).
    Use 7-step approach and report results for each hypothesis.
    Conduct 5x2 full-factorial MANCOVA
    Test following hypothesis:
    H7: Customer type (Frequent customer vs. First time customer) moderates the relationship between type of pricing strategy and combination of variables (perceived price fairness, Word-of-mouth and return intention – all calculated in part 1) when controlling for familiarity (calculated in part1)
    Use 7-step approach and report results.
    Conduct regression analysis
    Build a model that would include following predictors of word-of-mouth
    Age
    Gender
    Familiarity
    Customer type
    Perceived fairness
    Propose hypotheses for each potential relationship between independent and dependent variables
    Use 7-step approach and report results.
    Conduct k-means clustering analysis with 2 clusters
    Use following clustering variables
    Perceived_Fairness - Average of Fair 1, 2 and 3
    Word_of_mouth - Average of WOM 1, 2 and 3
    Return_Intention - Average of RI 1, 2 and 3
    Familiarity - Average of FAM 1 and 2
    Run the analysis even if assumptions have not been met
    Use 7-step approach and report results
    Interpret clustering solution
    Name clusters
    Report differences in means between clusters
    Report demographic differences between clusters  
    Part 5 – Hypothesis testing 3 – Regression - 50 pointsPart 6 – Clustering - 50 points
Coursework Sample Content Preview:

Night Club Price Analysis in SPSS
Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Course Code
Institutional Affiliation
Date
Night Club Price Analysis in SPSS
Part One
Gender
Females lead as frequent goers to the nightclub than males. They show a frequency of 134 while males had 116.
Gender


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Male

116

46.4

46.4

46.4


Female

134

53.6

53.6

100.0


Total

250

100.0

100.0


Ethnicity
Caucasian individuals go more frequently to the nightclub by 176 than another ethnic group—Hispania's followed by a frequency of 47, then African Americans by a frequency of 12. Pacific Islanders go less frequently of 2 than any other ethnic group. Asians, Native Americans, and other ethnic groups have a close frequency of 4, 4, and 5.
Ethnicity


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Caucasian

176

70.4

70.4

70.4


native American

4

1.6

1.6

72.0


Hispanic

47

18.8

18.8

90.8


African American

12

4.8

4.8

95.6


Asian

4

1.6

1.6

97.2


pacific islander

2

.8

.8

98.0


other

5

2.0

2.0

100.0


Total

250

100.0

100.0


Employment status
The result shows that Students are leading as the nightclub goers in the group by 112. They are closely followed by Full time employed individuals by a frequency of 90. Unemployed people go less frequently to the nightclub, as evident in the results. They were found to have a frequency of 9, which is very low. Part-time employees and retired individuals have a relative frequency of 23 and 16.
Employment status


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Unemployed

9

3.6

3.6

3.6


Student

112

44.8

44.8

48.4


Part-time employed

23

9.2

9.2

57.6


Full time employed

90

36.0

36.0

93.6


Retired

16

6.4

6.4

100.0


Total

250

100.0

100.0


Education
The results show that some college individuals went to nightclubs more than the others, by a frequency of 158. Some graduate school individuals were the tiniest goers with a frequency of 3, followed closely by Doctoral degree individuals and some high school individuals, both having a frequency of 4.
Education


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Some high school

4

1.6

1.6

1.6


High school diploma

31

12.4

12.4

14.0


Some college

158

63.2

63.2

77.2


Bachelor’s degree

41

16.4

16.4

93.6


Some graduate school

3

1.2

1.2

94.8


Master’s degree

9

3.6

3.6

98.4


Doctoral degree

4

1.6

1.6

100.0


Total

250

100.0

100.0


Income
The results show that those individuals earning income under $20 go to nightclubs more frequently than others. They lead by a frequency of 81. They are closely followed by those who make between $20 and $49.99 by a frequency of 71. Those who earn an income between$80 and $79.99 have the lowest frequency of 23. They are followed closely by those who earn between $50 and $79.99, having a frequency of 26. Those who make $100 and above had a frequency of 49.
Income


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

under $20.000

81

32.4

32.4

32.4


$20.000 - $49.999

71

28.4

28.4

60.8


$50.000 - $79.999

26

10.4

10.4

71.2


$80.000 - $99.999

23

9.2

9.2

80.4


$100.000 or over

49

19.6

19.6

100.0


Total

250

100.0

100.0


Age
The research shows that 21 year-olds are the leading group that goes to the nightclub. And they lead by a frequency of 49 and are followed by 22 year-olds with a frequency of 24. The data shows that as age increases, the frequency to go to the nightclub reduces.
Mean and standard deviation
The number of people examined was 250. They were asked different questions regarding the nightclub, and the following means and standard deviations were attained. The means of all the questions were between 4.41 and 4.83, and the standard deviation was between 1.462 and 1.663.
Descriptive Statistics


N

Mean

Std. Deviation

How fair is this nightclub's new pricing policy?

250

4.75

1.663

How ethical is this nightclub's new pricing policy?

250

4.76

1.632

How acceptable is this nightclub's new pricing policy?

250

4.83

1.574

I would spread positive word-of-mouth about this nightclub.

250

4.54

1.478

I would recommend this nightclub to my friends.

250

4.66

1.462

If my friends want to go to a nightclub, I would tell them to visit this one.

250

4.59

1.535

In the future, I intend to revisit this nightclub.

250

4.78

1.599

If I plan to visit a nightclub, I would most likely go to this one.

250

4.41

1.508

I would revisit this venue in the future.

250

4.74

1.571

Valid N (listwise)

250



Part 2
KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy.

.905

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity

Approx. Chi-Square

2618.419


df

36


Sig.

.000

It has a significant level of 0.000 lower than 0.05, which means our data is statistically significant.
Component Matrix


Component


1

2

In the future, I intend to revisit this nightclub.

.902

-.196

I would recommend this nightclub to my friends.

.898

-.203

If my friends want to go to a nightclub, I would tell them to visit this one.

.897

-.246

I would revisit this venue in the future.

.894

-.197

I would ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Sign In
Not register? Register Now!