E unbius reading response

Title Your name Subject and Section Professor’s Name Date 1 Summarize Wallace's central argument in your own words. Do you agree with his argument? Why or why not? Wallace's (1993) critique of postmodern irony has seeped into all channels, which is what TV finds irony in TV. Although most fiction writers about TV expose its superficiality, instead of that, they mimic ironic detachment, which stops in the air. Wallace writes of irony as well as becoming passive consumption. This is because irony is the most potent force of media. Otherwise, sincerity is unable to be maintained. Sarcasm is in vogue today, which is doubly rare emotionally. 2 The essay is dated and published in 1990, but do any of his criticisms apply to art today? Cultural trends? What, if anything, in today's society fills the role TV filled in 1990? Wallace's ...