Essay Available:
page:
1 pages/≈275 words
Sources:
1
Style:
APA
Subject:
Law
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 5.18
Topic:
The Case of Riley v. California (2014)
Coursework Instructions:
Criminal Justice Class
Topic: The Case of Riley v. California (2014)
Step #1: Read the PDF attachment titled “Chapter 10.1 Lecture Notes Digital Evidence and Significant Court Cases”.
Step #2: Read the PowerPoint attachment titled “Chapter 10.1 PowerPoint Digital Evidence and Significant Court Cases”.
Step #3: Go to the Federalist Society website which is https://fedsoc(dot)org/commentary/videos/big-win-for-internet-privacy and watch the video titled "No More Warrantless Cell Searches, Unless You Consent" by The Federalist Society.
You can also watch the video on YouTube in the link provided below...
https://www(dot)youtube(dot)com/watch?v=0xN6JYBaXVA
Step #4: After reviewing the PDF, the PowerPoint, and after viewing the Federalist Society video linked above, now discuss the Riley v. California by answering the following questions below:
In Riley v. California (2014), the Supreme Court held that law enforcement must obtain a warrant before searching a suspect's cell phone during an arrest.
Question: Why do you think the Court made this decision, and how did the unique nature of cell phones influence their reasoning? Also, do you agree with their conclusion? Why or why not?
===-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Coursework Assignment Guidelines
* Must be at least 1 full page.
*Must be in Times New Roman Font Size 12 with 1-inch margins all around.
*Must be in APA format 7
* Please answer the questions in your own words, and do not just copy information from the notes, PowerPoint, websites, or YouTube videos.
* Must have at least 1 source. In this case, the Federalist Society website and or YouTube video can be your sources, but cite them properly.
* Must have at least 1 reference. In this case, the Federalist Society website or YouTube video can be your references, but make sure to add them properly to your reference page.
== = = = = == = = = == = = =
Notes
* In the order form, I included the PDF attachment titled "Chapter 10.1 Lecture Notes Digital Evidence and Significant Court Cases”.
* In the order form, I included the PowerPoint attachment titled “Chapter 10.1 PowerPoint Digital Evidence and Significant Court Cases”.
==========================
Thank you for your time
Coursework Sample Content Preview:
The Case of Riley v. California
Your Name
Subject and Section
Professor’s Name
April 29, 2025
In Riley vs. California (2014), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police must acquire warrants before inspecting arrested individuals' mobile phones. The Court implemented this decision to demonstrate that modern smartphone digital data surpassed simple procedural boundaries since it represents such intensely private and broad digital information. The Court acknowledged how cell phones differ from prior physical items due to their massive capability to store personal information without limitations. To transmit personal details about an individual's home life, a smartphone gathers all life content, including photographs, videos, emails, health records, financial records, and GPS tracking data.
The Supreme Court established its verdict by examining distincti...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
-
Motivation
1 page/≈275 words | 2 Sources | APA | Law | Coursework |
-
Week 1 Assignment
4 pages/≈1100 words | 6 Sources | APA | Law | Coursework |
-
Week 2 Discussion Post
2 pages/≈550 words | 2 Sources | APA | Law | Coursework |