Research Ethics And Evaluation

CASP Checklist: 10 questions to help you make sense of a Qualitative research How to use this appraisal tool: Three broad issues need to be considered when appraising a qualitative study: 1371600-35987Are the results of the study valid? (Section A) What are the results?(Section B) Will the results help locally?(Section C) The 10 questions on the following pages are designed to help you think about these issues systematically. The first two questions are screening questions and can be answered quickly. If the answer to both is “yes”, it is worth proceeding with the remaining questions. There is some degree of overlap between the questions, you are asked to record a “yes”, “no” or “can’t tell” to most of the questions. A number of italicized prompts are given after each question. These are designed to remind you why the question is important. Record your reasons for your answers in the spaces provided. About: These checklists were designed to be used as educational pedagogic tools, as part of a workshop setting, therefore we do not suggest a scoring system. The core CASP checklists (randomized controlled trial & systematic review) were based on JAMA 'Users’ guides to the medical literature 1994 (adapted from Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, and Cook DJ), and piloted with health care practitioners. For each new checklist, a group of experts were assembled to develop and pilot the checklist and the workshop format with which it would be used. Over the years overall adjustments have been made to the format, but a recent survey of checklist users reiterated that the basic format continues to be useful and appropriate. Referencing: we recommend using the Harvard style citation, i.e.: Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2018). CASP (insert name of checklist i.e. Qualitative) Checklist. [online] Available at: URL. Accessed: Date Accessed. ©CASP this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial- Share A like. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- sa/3.0/ www.casp-uk.net Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) part of Oxford Centre for Triple Value Healthcare www.casp-uk.net 09943782 Paper for appraisal and reference: Adibelli, S. & Korkmaz, F. (2022). Pressure injury prevention practices of intensive care unit nurses in Turkey: A descriptive multiple-methods qualitative study. Journal of Tissue Viability. 31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358395400_Pressure_injury_prevention_practices_of_intensive_care_unit_nurses_in_Turkey_A_descriptive_multiple-methods_qualitative_study Section A: Are the results valid? 1. Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research? 9155431472Yes ✔ HINT: Consider * what was the goal of the research? ...