Google’s Monopoly of Knowledge According to Technological Determinism Theory

Final Project
Name of the Student
Institutional Affiliation
Course ID
Instructor’s Name
Due Date
Google’s Monopoly of Knowledge According to Technological Determinism Theory
Introduction
Many global tech companies are known for obstructing competition in the software industry. Tech companies are responsible for variations in some cultural phenomena. Google is a tech company that enjoys the advantages of being a monopoly power. Google has a monopoly of knowledge. This essay will explore Google’s knowledge monopoly. It will also explore how technological determinism leads to monopoly.
Google controls significant human interactions and activities. It gives direct access to most social media soft wares such as Amazon and Facebook. According to Lipsky (2021), productive technology influences organizational structure and human social relations. Cultural practices and social relations circle around the economic and technological baseline of a community. Rapid-changing technological factors alter human actions.
Discussion
Technological determinism assumes that society's technology influences its cultural values and social structure. It was founded by Thorstein Veblen, who believed in the proposition that technology defines nature in any given society (Pokrovskaia et al., 2021). It means that technology determines the outcome, and it is a driving force of culture. It also defines the course of history in a given society. It's a reductionist theory in communication that gives a link between society's nature and technology. It provides a perspective as to who controls human affairs. Technological determinism is related to the struggle between ceremonial culture and technology. As a tech company, Google is a primary and essential source of information and hence, leads to change in society. It influences the choices people make. Technological determinism is manifested with the introduction of new technologies that affect various times and changes, leading to the loss of existing knowledge.
Google has market shares, which dictate its supply of products, services, and information dissemination. It gives them access to information all over the world. They influence their services because their services are almost free and use advertisement segments to promote specific ideologies. This tech giant has enormous power over the population.
Technology has influenced the consumer's behaviors, attitudes, and opinions. Google has been accused of accessing people's data and copyright claims. These data acquired are used to influence the family cultures and dynamics. Technological determinism has influenced the consumption of information. Excessive use of technological devices causes isolation and poor social constructions, expanding and influencing poor communication and low responsibilities. The company can discriminate on free speech and, therefore, impact ideology development among political issues. There are no checks and balances in its activities because it is purely based on shareholders' contributions and powers. The question of global acceptance of information and knowledge being determined by selected companies is often raised, and it calls for regulation of the intensive influence they wield.
Google is concentrated in possession of the ability to specialize in products and internet-related services such as cloud computing, online advertisement technologies, and software. Google's other monopoly of knowledge is reflected in its illegal monopoly over search-based advertising. It controls over 88% of general searches. Google claims its competitive advantage is derived from its superior product delivery (Pokrovskaia et al., 2021). Google makes the majority of its revenue by selling advertisements based on search keywords. The niche is targeting the ad campaigns by geographical and interests.
Their monopoly of knowledge gives them product ambiguity and dominance. Google has found a way to integrate into the activities and daily lives of a vast population. Also, Google has invested massively in other ventures that are meant to bring success to the company. For example, some of its successful ventures are Android, Chrome, Gmail, and YouTube (Lingel 2021). These ventures have helped them access user retention and engagement. Google's search engine is the main cash cow for the company and helps it pursue broader strategic goals.
Google has barely any competitors, and they benefit from the customer's propositions. Small search startups are prevented from entry despite their consumer data protection policies. These other startups offer their tools to enterprise customers to improve Google and their branded sites' performance. Therefore, it is hard to envision anyone as a rival. Google has a monopoly in general search as per their settings in their search engines. This aspect of the general search engine may program the consumers to a specific type of culture.
Google offers most of its services for free, and it doesn't provide essential services for the economy. Hence, the corporation claims that anti-competitive practices such as rising cost of services and prices do not apply with the monopoly claim. They argue that the concept of social networking is not defined and that the problem lies in the lack of regulation and capitalist systems. With Google's limited competition, there is a difference in their significant influence on the cognitive practices, standards, and conclusion. Therefore, it may cause moral conflict. The merger and takeover of competitive social networks have proven detrimental to innovation and have caused economic problems.
Google can influence the communication of information on the internet. Google can close to 70% of referral earnings in the world's economy (Patterson, 2017). Internet searching can be controlled by Google's algorithm, which translates to its influence on people. The company's algorithm can determine incendiary and violent speech and what they can see on their news feed. It means that a person can adopt, believe or practice what the company project on their algorithm. It makes the issue of competition an epistemic and moral issue. In line with this, the social epistemology study suggests that information transfer and social media's influence on individuals are affected by evidence, beliefs, and testimonies. These factors impact what an epistemic community will conclude.
Technological Determin...