Philosophy: Nietzsches Distinction, Daly's Term Gyn / Ecology

Name
Course
Instructor
Date
Philosophy
1] Explain Nietzsche’s distinction between the master/slave morality. Explain the significance of death of god?” What does Nietzsche mean by the “transformation of all values”? To whom is he speaking?
Nietzsche focused on the history of decay in morality among Europeans and specifically Germans to distinguish master/slave morality where the notion of good is associated with nobility while bad is associated with the common. The master/ slave morality distinguishes the duality, where good signifies the people of noble minds as compared to cowardly and petty people. The idea master nobility highlights the hierarchy in people and the noble think of themselves highly compared to the common person. On the contrary, slave morality is the opposite of noble morality, where there is rejection of hierarchy and morality is viewed as being equally applied to all regardless of class. People who are weak in will exhibit herd/ slave mentality that rejects life–affirming behaviors while denying basic instincts (Nietzsche 114).
The idea of “God is dead” signifies that the Christian worldview and sense of morality no longer applied. Questions surrounding the role of Christianity morality in the society showed that people no longer attached meaning to this form of morality. Christian morality had become less prominent as the people had” killed God” and rejected him in the process by abandoning Christian ideals. The idea forms the basis is for questioning rationality and how people apply theories. Additionally, by rejecting Christian morality, Nietzsche seems to support nihilism with the view that laws of morality are abstract as mankind no longer drew inspiration from God (114). This extends to the belief that there was no longer guarantee that God’s existence offered security to Europeans as the Western culture had abandoned the religious culture. Hence, the death of God provides an opportunity to move away from illusions and rely on freedom to develop new values (114).
Nietzsche calls into question Christian values in the face of decadence and dwindling influence of morality in Germany grounded in Christianity. The case for re-evaluating the values is that decadence had not spared moralism, while other philosophers had failed to address the place of values in the modern German society. The question of morality had long been associated with ancient philosophy, while contemporary ideas did not necessarily question the association of values and morality. Revaluation values u is then the basis for liberating human life, with people being urged to look more deeply into humanity through self-examination. Philosophies, beliefs, and religions that emerged from weaknesses represented decay. By adopting new and true values, people would move beyond traditional values, which has perverted the will to power.
Nietzsche mainly speaks to the religious authorities who supported traditional moralities by clearly designating the approved behavior and what was to be expected. The people were expected to follow a hierarchy of values, which defined the society. Just like Christian values had replaced Ancient values, and there was a need to reevaluate values that no longer applied to people. Hence, Nietzsche also sought to engage with like-minded individuals who also wanted make changes in the society. Nietzsche was preoccupied with the declining role of objective values of religion, which had been standards of lives, but the moral code was no longer useful (114). This was not an individual project, but rather an attempt to engage with the public and academia to address the questions of morality in the modern society, the face of the declining role of the Church in people’s lives.
2] What is the meaning of Daly’s term “gyn/ecology”? What is moral significance? What does Daly give to the terms metaethics” and metapatriarchal”? How do they relate to Daly’s critique of ethics and metaethics
Daly argues that gyn/ ecology signifies the interrelationships of women and the society, highlighting how patriarchy has largely ignored the concerns of women. This is apparent in the field of gynecology where there are more male practitioners than women, despite reproductive being a woman’s issue. This highlights that the male control over women, their bodies and language use has perpetuated patriarchal myths (321). This extends to indifference to women issues by the society, as men hold power. Daly argued that gyn/ ecology enabled women top challenge the prevailing male stronghold on “sciences of woman kind” and chart their own way through rediscovering themselves without the input of men (319). In other words, the experiences of women could only be explained by them who have lived through them. The experiences and the lives of women were interconnected and Gyn/ Ecology was not fixated and disempowered as gynecology (321).
The moral significance of gyn/ecology is that it provides a basis for which to analyze the impact of patriarchy on women and the society. Daly does not shy away from calling for men to acknowledge their responsibility for oppressing women, while wome...