100% (1)
page:
8 pages/≈2200 words
Sources:
-1
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Term Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 34.56
Topic:

Infidelity in Romantic Relationships

Term Paper Instructions:
Your final paper should be submitted by the end of week 7, should be MLA format compliant, and is 7-10 pages (not including a cover page and references page). The paper should have the usual research paper structure: • Cover Page • Introduction – give a background of the topic and define the problem. • Identify the hypothesis – the specific question you plan to research and explore through the paper • Literature Review – conduct a literature review of at least 3 peer reviewed journal articles, that have addressed your hypothesis, and analyze what they have found (remember these need to be articles from peer reviewed journals). The literature review should provide a description of the research in these articles, a summary of their findings and an evaluation of how it relates to your hypothesis • Conclusion – reflect on your original research intention (the hypothesis), and tie together key topics from your literature review that support or reject your hypothesis. • Given the brevity of the paper, not all areas of research on your hypothesis can be covered in your paper. Identify what areas you would include if you had more time and resources. Also identify limitations of the research that you have reviewed and suggest future research opportunities that you might be interested in. • References
Term Paper Sample Content Preview:
Research Paper: Infidelity in Romantic Relationships Name Institution Course Code and Title Instructor Date Predicting Infidelity in Romantic Relationships: Attachment Styles, Relationship Satisfaction, and Contextual Factors Introduction Romantic relationships are often built on trust, commitment, and mutual understanding. However, infidelity remains a prevalent and destructive force that can shatter these foundations, leaving lasting emotional scars and broken bonds in its wake. Defined as a breach of trust through emotional or physical intimacy with someone outside the primary relationship, infidelity affects a significant portion of couples worldwide (Warach and Josephs 69). The impact of infidelity extends far beyond the immediate emotional trauma. It can lead to depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress symptoms in the betrayed partner. For the relationship itself, infidelity often results in decreased relationship satisfaction, increased conflict, and in many cases, dissolution of the partnership. Despite its prevalence and devastating consequences, the underlying factors that contribute to infidelity remain complex. Understanding the causes and predictors of infidelity is crucial for developing effective prevention strategies and interventions in couple therapy (Belu and O’Sullivan 270). This research paper aims to explore the various factors that contribute to infidelity in romantic relationships, focusing particularly on the role of attachment styles, relationship satisfaction, and opportunity as potential predictors of unfaithful behavior. Hypothesis This study hypothesizes that insecure attachment styles (anxious or avoidant), lower levels of relationship satisfaction, and increased opportunities for extra-dyadic encounters are positively correlated with a higher likelihood of engaging in infidelity within romantic relationships. Literature Review Article 1 A meta-analysis conducted by Candel and Turliuc, “Insecure attachment and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis of actor and partner associations” provides valuable insights into the relationship between adult insecure attachment and relationship satisfaction. The study examined both anxious and avoidant attachment styles and their impact on relationship satisfaction at both the individual (actor) and partner levels. Key Findings There are several key findings. One of these is that a significant negative relationship exists between attachment insecurity (both anxiety and avoidance) and relationship satisfaction (Candel and Turliuc pp 190-199). Secondly, the authors found that the actor effect (how one's attachment style affects one's satisfaction) is stronger than the partner effect (how one's partner's attachment style affects the individual's satisfaction) (Candel and Turliuc pp 190-199). Thirdly, the relationship that prevails between attachment insecurity and relationship satisfaction is influenced by factors such as publication type, age, relationship status, relationship length, and geographical region (Candel and Turliuc pp. 190-199). These findings support the hypothesis, implying that insecure attachment styles are negatively correlated with relationship satisfaction, which may, in turn, increase the likelihood of infidelity. The stronger actor effect suggests that an individual's attachment insecurity plays a more significant role in their relationship satisfaction than their partner's attachment style. The study's comprehensive approach, analyzing 132 eligible studies, lends considerable weight to its conclusions. The identification of moderating factors such as age, relationship status, and relationship length provides a significant understanding of how attachment insecurity impacts relationship satisfaction across different contexts and life stages. One particularly interesting aspect of this meta-analysis is the examination of both actor and partner effects. The finding that an individual's attachment insecurity has a stronger impact on their relationship satisfaction than their partner's attachment style has important implications for both research and clinical practice. The study suggests that the various interventions employed to solve individual attachment issues may be significantly effective in improving overall relationship satisfaction. Article 2 The research by Fincham and May, "Infidelity in romantic relationships," provides a critical overview of the empirical state of knowledge related to infidelity, delivering valuable information regarding its prevalence, impact, and predictors. Key Findings According to the study, every year, the frequency of sexual infidelity is estimated to range between 2-4% of the spouse population (Fincham and May pp. 70-74). Secondly, the authors saw that infidelity showcases seasonal variation, peaking during summer months (Fincham and May pp. 70-74). Thirdly, the gap between genders regarding infidelity rates appears to be bridging, as males and females now engage in it at an equal rate (Fincham and May pp. 70-74). In addition, infidelity is said to be the most common cause of divorce in 160 societies, and infidelity can be predicted by individual, relational, and contextual factors (Fincham and May pp. 70-74). The author's discussion of the prevalence of infidelity provides critical context for understanding the extent of this problem. The study shows that only a small proportion of spouses; 2-4%, are involved in sexual infidelity per annum. However, when thinking about long-term relationships, the risk is substantial. This is a reaffirmation of the fact that efforts should constantly focus on the strengthening of relationships to prevent infidelity. Seasonal variation in rates of infidelity which peak in the summer, points to the idea that contextual forces have a causal role in infidelity. The authors speculate that extra-dyadic encounters are facilitated by increased open transportation during the warm summer months, an activity that reduces the chance of detection. This aligns with the hypothesis, postulating opportunity as relevant for infidelity. It points out that couples may particularly benefit from being clearly aware of relation...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Sign In
Not register? Register Now!